Affective and evaluative responses to pop music

From reviews published in the “serious” pop music press, twenty recordings were selected which had received consistently favourable appraisals on affective and evaluative bases. A further twenty recordings were selected on the basis of high levels of chart performance but a lack of critical acclaim....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: North, Adrian, Hargreaves, David
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer New York LLC 1998
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22997
_version_ 1848751028934017024
author North, Adrian
Hargreaves, David
author_facet North, Adrian
Hargreaves, David
author_sort North, Adrian
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description From reviews published in the “serious” pop music press, twenty recordings were selected which had received consistently favourable appraisals on affective and evaluative bases. A further twenty recordings were selected on the basis of high levels of chart performance but a lack of critical acclaim. Sixty-four subjects rated representative excerpts of these recordings on 11-point scales of either liking or artistic merit. The results indicated significantly lower liking and artistic merit ratings of critically praised excerpts; a positive liking-artistic merit correlation; and some “fragmentation” between affective and evaluative responses. The apparent discrepancy between the attitudes of the music press and subjects' ratings is discussed in terms of the availability and sophistication of evaluation cues.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:46:13Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-22997
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:46:13Z
publishDate 1998
publisher Springer New York LLC
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-229972017-09-13T13:59:01Z Affective and evaluative responses to pop music North, Adrian Hargreaves, David From reviews published in the “serious” pop music press, twenty recordings were selected which had received consistently favourable appraisals on affective and evaluative bases. A further twenty recordings were selected on the basis of high levels of chart performance but a lack of critical acclaim. Sixty-four subjects rated representative excerpts of these recordings on 11-point scales of either liking or artistic merit. The results indicated significantly lower liking and artistic merit ratings of critically praised excerpts; a positive liking-artistic merit correlation; and some “fragmentation” between affective and evaluative responses. The apparent discrepancy between the attitudes of the music press and subjects' ratings is discussed in terms of the availability and sophistication of evaluation cues. 1998 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22997 10.1007/s12144-998-1024-5 Springer New York LLC fulltext
spellingShingle North, Adrian
Hargreaves, David
Affective and evaluative responses to pop music
title Affective and evaluative responses to pop music
title_full Affective and evaluative responses to pop music
title_fullStr Affective and evaluative responses to pop music
title_full_unstemmed Affective and evaluative responses to pop music
title_short Affective and evaluative responses to pop music
title_sort affective and evaluative responses to pop music
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22997