Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chau, Anson, Fung, K.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Mosby-Year Book, Inc 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22120
_version_ 1848750781782556672
author Chau, Anson
Fung, K.
author_facet Chau, Anson
Fung, K.
author_sort Chau, Anson
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:42:17Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-22120
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:42:17Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Mosby-Year Book, Inc
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-221202018-12-14T00:54:10Z Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography Chau, Anson Fung, K. 2009 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22120 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.009 Mosby-Year Book, Inc restricted
spellingShingle Chau, Anson
Fung, K.
Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
title Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
title_full Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
title_short Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
title_sort comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/22120