The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes

Background and Aims: Diabetes Mellitus affects over 630 million people worldwide and is directly attributed to 1.5 mil- lion deaths annually. Few studies have been conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of gold-standard type 1 diabetes treatment resulting in low uptake among countries that do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barnett, N., Geelhoed, E., Davis, E., Jones, T., De Bock, M., Smith, G., Norman, Richard
Format: Journal Article
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21907
_version_ 1848750722198274048
author Barnett, N.
Geelhoed, E.
Davis, E.
Jones, T.
De Bock, M.
Smith, G.
Norman, Richard
author_facet Barnett, N.
Geelhoed, E.
Davis, E.
Jones, T.
De Bock, M.
Smith, G.
Norman, Richard
author_sort Barnett, N.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background and Aims: Diabetes Mellitus affects over 630 million people worldwide and is directly attributed to 1.5 mil- lion deaths annually. Few studies have been conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of gold-standard type 1 diabetes treatment resulting in low uptake among countries that do not provide subsidised access to patients. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are an innovative measurement tool applied in a number of fields, however their application in health treatment lags. DCEs can be used to explore preferences towards alter- native treatment options and to determine relative cost-effectiveness using a holistic measure of relative attributes in the decision-making process. Method: A literature review was undertaken to identify the application of discrete choice experiments to evaluate preferences in type 1 diabetes treatments. Search terms were restricted to studies on type 1 diabetes but were not limited on any other basis. Results: Three papers contained the terms ‘discrete choice experiment’ and ‘type 1 diabetes’ from relevant databases. At present there are no studies that analyse the cost-effectiveness of type 1 diabetes treatment using a discrete choice experiment methodology. Conclusion: A significant gap in the literature suggests there is scope for a discrete choice experiment to be conducted with patients and parents of children suffering from type 1 diabetes. An applied DCE would contribute valuable insights into the benefit measurement of gold-standard therapies and may improve access if cost-effectiveness is demonstrated
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:41:21Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-21907
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:41:21Z
publishDate 2016
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-219072017-01-30T12:28:09Z The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes Barnett, N. Geelhoed, E. Davis, E. Jones, T. De Bock, M. Smith, G. Norman, Richard Background and Aims: Diabetes Mellitus affects over 630 million people worldwide and is directly attributed to 1.5 mil- lion deaths annually. Few studies have been conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of gold-standard type 1 diabetes treatment resulting in low uptake among countries that do not provide subsidised access to patients. Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are an innovative measurement tool applied in a number of fields, however their application in health treatment lags. DCEs can be used to explore preferences towards alter- native treatment options and to determine relative cost-effectiveness using a holistic measure of relative attributes in the decision-making process. Method: A literature review was undertaken to identify the application of discrete choice experiments to evaluate preferences in type 1 diabetes treatments. Search terms were restricted to studies on type 1 diabetes but were not limited on any other basis. Results: Three papers contained the terms ‘discrete choice experiment’ and ‘type 1 diabetes’ from relevant databases. At present there are no studies that analyse the cost-effectiveness of type 1 diabetes treatment using a discrete choice experiment methodology. Conclusion: A significant gap in the literature suggests there is scope for a discrete choice experiment to be conducted with patients and parents of children suffering from type 1 diabetes. An applied DCE would contribute valuable insights into the benefit measurement of gold-standard therapies and may improve access if cost-effectiveness is demonstrated 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21907 restricted
spellingShingle Barnett, N.
Geelhoed, E.
Davis, E.
Jones, T.
De Bock, M.
Smith, G.
Norman, Richard
The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
title The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
title_full The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
title_fullStr The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
title_full_unstemmed The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
title_short The application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
title_sort application of discrete choice experiments in cost-effectiveness studies to assess the benefits of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21907