Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students
Despite its widespread support, the most effective simulation-based debriefing method has little evidence to support its efficacy. In this study, we compared the effect of peer-led and instructor-led debriefing among nursing students. The study was conducted with a non-equivalent control group using...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21527 |
| _version_ | 1848750614639542272 |
|---|---|
| author | Roh, Y. Kelly, Michelle Ha, E. |
| author_facet | Roh, Y. Kelly, Michelle Ha, E. |
| author_sort | Roh, Y. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Despite its widespread support, the most effective simulation-based debriefing method has little evidence to support its efficacy. In this study, we compared the effect of peer-led and instructor-led debriefing among nursing students. The study was conducted with a non-equivalent control group using a pretest-post-test design. A convenience sample of third-year nursing students was used for the study, where 65 students enrolled in a 2-week clinical placement rotation were randomly assigned to the instructor-led group or peer-led group. The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills, satisfaction with simulation, and quality of debriefing in the peer-led group were compared to those in the instructor-led group. Group differences at each testing interval were analyzed using independent t-test. Nursing students in the instructor-led debriefing group showed better subsequent cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance, more satisfaction with simulation experience, and higher debriefing scores compared to the peer-led group. From our study, instructor-led debriefing is an effective method in improving skills performance, inducing favorable satisfaction, and providing better quality of debriefing among nursing students. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:39:38Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-21527 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:39:38Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-215272019-02-19T05:35:00Z Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students Roh, Y. Kelly, Michelle Ha, E. Despite its widespread support, the most effective simulation-based debriefing method has little evidence to support its efficacy. In this study, we compared the effect of peer-led and instructor-led debriefing among nursing students. The study was conducted with a non-equivalent control group using a pretest-post-test design. A convenience sample of third-year nursing students was used for the study, where 65 students enrolled in a 2-week clinical placement rotation were randomly assigned to the instructor-led group or peer-led group. The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills, satisfaction with simulation, and quality of debriefing in the peer-led group were compared to those in the instructor-led group. Group differences at each testing interval were analyzed using independent t-test. Nursing students in the instructor-led debriefing group showed better subsequent cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance, more satisfaction with simulation experience, and higher debriefing scores compared to the peer-led group. From our study, instructor-led debriefing is an effective method in improving skills performance, inducing favorable satisfaction, and providing better quality of debriefing among nursing students. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21527 10.1111/nhs.12259 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Roh, Y. Kelly, Michelle Ha, E. Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students |
| title | Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students |
| title_full | Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students |
| title_short | Comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students |
| title_sort | comparison of instructor-led versus peer-led debriefing in nursing students |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21527 |