Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students

© 2015. Background: Australian caesarean birth rates have exceeded 30% in most states and are approaching 45%, on average, in private hospitals. Australian midwifery practice occurs almost exclusively in hospitals; less than 3% of women deliver at home or in birthing centres. It is unclear whether t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stoll, K., Hauck, Yvonne, Hall, W.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21367
_version_ 1848750570442063872
author Stoll, K.
Hauck, Yvonne
Hall, W.
author_facet Stoll, K.
Hauck, Yvonne
Hall, W.
author_sort Stoll, K.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2015. Background: Australian caesarean birth rates have exceeded 30% in most states and are approaching 45%, on average, in private hospitals. Australian midwifery practice occurs almost exclusively in hospitals; less than 3% of women deliver at home or in birthing centres. It is unclear whether the trend towards hospital-based, high interventionist birth reflects preferences of the next generation of maternity care consumers. Aim and methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional online survey of 760 Western Australian (WA) university students in 2014, to examine their preferences for place of birth, type of maternity care, mode of birth and attitudes towards birth. Findings: More students who preferred midwives (35.8%) had vaginal birth intentions, contested statements that birth is unpredictable and risky, and valued patient-provider relationships. More students who preferred obstetricians (21.8%) expressed concerns about childbirth safety, feared birth, held favourable views towards obstetric technology, and expressed concerns about the impact of pregnancy and birth on the female body. One in 8 students preferred out-of-hospital birth settings, supporting consumer demand for midwife-attended births at home and in birthing centres. Stories and experiences of friends and family shaped students' care provider preferences, rather than the media or information learned at school. Conclusion: Students who express preferences for midwives have significantly different views about birth compared to students who prefer obstetricians. Increasing access to midwifery care in all settings (hospital, birthing centre and home) is a cost effective strategy to decrease obstetric interventions for low risk women and a desirable option for the next generation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:38:56Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-21367
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:38:56Z
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-213672017-09-13T13:53:06Z Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students Stoll, K. Hauck, Yvonne Hall, W. © 2015. Background: Australian caesarean birth rates have exceeded 30% in most states and are approaching 45%, on average, in private hospitals. Australian midwifery practice occurs almost exclusively in hospitals; less than 3% of women deliver at home or in birthing centres. It is unclear whether the trend towards hospital-based, high interventionist birth reflects preferences of the next generation of maternity care consumers. Aim and methods: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional online survey of 760 Western Australian (WA) university students in 2014, to examine their preferences for place of birth, type of maternity care, mode of birth and attitudes towards birth. Findings: More students who preferred midwives (35.8%) had vaginal birth intentions, contested statements that birth is unpredictable and risky, and valued patient-provider relationships. More students who preferred obstetricians (21.8%) expressed concerns about childbirth safety, feared birth, held favourable views towards obstetric technology, and expressed concerns about the impact of pregnancy and birth on the female body. One in 8 students preferred out-of-hospital birth settings, supporting consumer demand for midwife-attended births at home and in birthing centres. Stories and experiences of friends and family shaped students' care provider preferences, rather than the media or information learned at school. Conclusion: Students who express preferences for midwives have significantly different views about birth compared to students who prefer obstetricians. Increasing access to midwifery care in all settings (hospital, birthing centre and home) is a cost effective strategy to decrease obstetric interventions for low risk women and a desirable option for the next generation. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21367 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.07.187 Elsevier restricted
spellingShingle Stoll, K.
Hauck, Yvonne
Hall, W.
Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students
title Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students
title_full Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students
title_fullStr Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students
title_full_unstemmed Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students
title_short Home or hospital? Midwife or physician? Preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among Western Australian students
title_sort home or hospital? midwife or physician? preferences for maternity care provider and place of birth among western australian students
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21367