Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Examinations in an Australian Tertiary Hospital

Introduction: The use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) has been recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) since 1996. However, the national DRLs normally focus on the most common radiological examinations. The purpose of this study was to conduct a patient do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ng, Curtise, Sun, Zhonghua, Parry, H., Burrage, J.
Format: Journal Article
Published: American Scientific Publishers 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21186
_version_ 1848750519992975360
author Ng, Curtise
Sun, Zhonghua
Parry, H.
Burrage, J.
author_facet Ng, Curtise
Sun, Zhonghua
Parry, H.
Burrage, J.
author_sort Ng, Curtise
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Introduction: The use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) has been recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) since 1996. However, the national DRLs normally focus on the most common radiological examinations. The purpose of this study was to conduct a patient dose survey within an Australian tertiary hospital for proposing local DRLs for a wider range of (common) X-ray examinations. Methods: This survey was conducted retrospectively in one of the Australian largest hospitals. A tailored computer system was used to retrieve digital radiography images of adult outpatients taken within a period of one year from the hospital's picture archiving and communication system and their dose-related digital imaging and communication in medicine data was extracted for automatic dose analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the kerma-area product (KAP) and exposure factor distributions for comparison with the literature. Results: A total of 27,311 KAP values were collected from 59 (common) general X-ray projections. Nearly all third quartile (Q3) values of KAP for the most common projections (82%) were up to 87.6% lower than the national DRLs from various countries and European Commission. However, most of the median kV (71%) and nearly half of the median source-to-image distances (46%) were in the ranges of 3–22% and 2–18% lower than the reference values respectively. Conclusion: The local DRLs for 59 (common) X-ray projections were proposed based on the Q3 values of KAP for patient dose optimisation.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:38:08Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-21186
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:38:08Z
publishDate 2014
publisher American Scientific Publishers
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-211862017-09-13T13:53:47Z Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Examinations in an Australian Tertiary Hospital Ng, Curtise Sun, Zhonghua Parry, H. Burrage, J. Diagnostic reference levels Pacs Dicom X-Ray examinations Dose survey Introduction: The use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) has been recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) since 1996. However, the national DRLs normally focus on the most common radiological examinations. The purpose of this study was to conduct a patient dose survey within an Australian tertiary hospital for proposing local DRLs for a wider range of (common) X-ray examinations. Methods: This survey was conducted retrospectively in one of the Australian largest hospitals. A tailored computer system was used to retrieve digital radiography images of adult outpatients taken within a period of one year from the hospital's picture archiving and communication system and their dose-related digital imaging and communication in medicine data was extracted for automatic dose analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the kerma-area product (KAP) and exposure factor distributions for comparison with the literature. Results: A total of 27,311 KAP values were collected from 59 (common) general X-ray projections. Nearly all third quartile (Q3) values of KAP for the most common projections (82%) were up to 87.6% lower than the national DRLs from various countries and European Commission. However, most of the median kV (71%) and nearly half of the median source-to-image distances (46%) were in the ranges of 3–22% and 2–18% lower than the reference values respectively. Conclusion: The local DRLs for 59 (common) X-ray projections were proposed based on the Q3 values of KAP for patient dose optimisation. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21186 10.1166/jmihi.2014.1250 American Scientific Publishers restricted
spellingShingle Diagnostic reference levels
Pacs
Dicom
X-Ray examinations
Dose survey
Ng, Curtise
Sun, Zhonghua
Parry, H.
Burrage, J.
Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Examinations in an Australian Tertiary Hospital
title Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Examinations in an Australian Tertiary Hospital
title_full Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Examinations in an Australian Tertiary Hospital
title_fullStr Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Examinations in an Australian Tertiary Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Examinations in an Australian Tertiary Hospital
title_short Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-Ray Examinations in an Australian Tertiary Hospital
title_sort local diagnostic reference levels for x-ray examinations in an australian tertiary hospital
topic Diagnostic reference levels
Pacs
Dicom
X-Ray examinations
Dose survey
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21186