The behaviour of dispute resolution methods in Malaysian construction industry

Every project is bound to have disagreement. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques do not require full legal process and become mainstream option to traditional dispute resolutions. Yet, the actual practice of ADR is very low in the construction industry. Therefore, a comprehensive study i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chong, Heap Yih, Rosli, M.
Format: Conference Paper
Published: 2009
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21127
_version_ 1848750503512506368
author Chong, Heap Yih
Rosli, M.
author_facet Chong, Heap Yih
Rosli, M.
author_sort Chong, Heap Yih
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Every project is bound to have disagreement. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques do not require full legal process and become mainstream option to traditional dispute resolutions. Yet, the actual practice of ADR is very low in the construction industry. Therefore, a comprehensive study is necessary to understand the behaviour of these dispute resolution methods. The research described in this paper discusses the philosophies and the selection factors of the dispute resolution methods. The factors are based on the attributes of the methods. Preliminary interview and questionnaire survey were conducted. The results from the data collected indicated that the contractors and developers are keen on ADR methods, however arbitration and litigation are somehow accepted and agreed by the respondents. It is concluded that selection on ADR or non-ADR is not a major issue, rather the increased efficiency and appreciation of the methods is more demanding towards the desired benefits at the end of the proceedings. ©2009 IEEE.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:37:52Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-21127
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:37:52Z
publishDate 2009
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-211272017-09-13T13:52:23Z The behaviour of dispute resolution methods in Malaysian construction industry Chong, Heap Yih Rosli, M. Every project is bound to have disagreement. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques do not require full legal process and become mainstream option to traditional dispute resolutions. Yet, the actual practice of ADR is very low in the construction industry. Therefore, a comprehensive study is necessary to understand the behaviour of these dispute resolution methods. The research described in this paper discusses the philosophies and the selection factors of the dispute resolution methods. The factors are based on the attributes of the methods. Preliminary interview and questionnaire survey were conducted. The results from the data collected indicated that the contractors and developers are keen on ADR methods, however arbitration and litigation are somehow accepted and agreed by the respondents. It is concluded that selection on ADR or non-ADR is not a major issue, rather the increased efficiency and appreciation of the methods is more demanding towards the desired benefits at the end of the proceedings. ©2009 IEEE. 2009 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21127 10.1109/IEEM.2009.5373253 restricted
spellingShingle Chong, Heap Yih
Rosli, M.
The behaviour of dispute resolution methods in Malaysian construction industry
title The behaviour of dispute resolution methods in Malaysian construction industry
title_full The behaviour of dispute resolution methods in Malaysian construction industry
title_fullStr The behaviour of dispute resolution methods in Malaysian construction industry
title_full_unstemmed The behaviour of dispute resolution methods in Malaysian construction industry
title_short The behaviour of dispute resolution methods in Malaysian construction industry
title_sort behaviour of dispute resolution methods in malaysian construction industry
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21127