Commentary: Developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research

Reviewing colleagues’ work and providing a review, a commentary, or reflections is always a privilege because it enables the reader to be more aware of his or her own research contributions. The reader may provide critical and constructive comments as in the case of a journal manuscript submitted fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Treagust, David, Tsui, C.
Format: Book Chapter
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21028
_version_ 1848750475844780032
author Treagust, David
Tsui, C.
author_facet Treagust, David
Tsui, C.
author_sort Treagust, David
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Reviewing colleagues’ work and providing a review, a commentary, or reflections is always a privilege because it enables the reader to be more aware of his or her own research contributions. The reader may provide critical and constructive comments as in the case of a journal manuscript submitted for consideration or as in the case of this chapter to reflect how the reading relates to the reviewers’ knowledge and experiences and then comment. In this chapter, we comment on some aspects—it is not possible to comment on all—and reflect upon the chapter authors’ work from Mainland China, Lebanon, Macau, Malaysia, and Mongolia about science education research and practice in their countries/regions.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:37:26Z
format Book Chapter
id curtin-20.500.11937-21028
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:37:26Z
publishDate 2016
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-210282019-09-10T06:25:35Z Commentary: Developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research Treagust, David Tsui, C. Reviewing colleagues’ work and providing a review, a commentary, or reflections is always a privilege because it enables the reader to be more aware of his or her own research contributions. The reader may provide critical and constructive comments as in the case of a journal manuscript submitted for consideration or as in the case of this chapter to reflect how the reading relates to the reviewers’ knowledge and experiences and then comment. In this chapter, we comment on some aspects—it is not possible to comment on all—and reflect upon the chapter authors’ work from Mainland China, Lebanon, Macau, Malaysia, and Mongolia about science education research and practice in their countries/regions. 2016 Book Chapter http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21028 10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_7 restricted
spellingShingle Treagust, David
Tsui, C.
Commentary: Developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research
title Commentary: Developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research
title_full Commentary: Developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research
title_fullStr Commentary: Developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research
title_full_unstemmed Commentary: Developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research
title_short Commentary: Developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research
title_sort commentary: developments and reforms in science education for improving the quality of teaching and research
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/21028