A commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: Redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P.

A meta-analytic review of the Triple P-Positive Parenting program by Wilson et al., recently published in BMC Medicine, claimed to demonstrate that although Triple P is widely disseminated and adopted, the evidence attesting to the effectiveness of the program is not as convincing as it may appear....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanders, M., Pickering, J., Kirby, J., Turner, K., Morawska, A., Mazzucchelli, Trevor, Ralph, A., Sofronoff, K.
Format: Journal Article
Published: BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19956
_version_ 1848750175329189888
author Sanders, M.
Pickering, J.
Kirby, J.
Turner, K.
Morawska, A.
Mazzucchelli, Trevor
Ralph, A.
Sofronoff, K.
author_facet Sanders, M.
Pickering, J.
Kirby, J.
Turner, K.
Morawska, A.
Mazzucchelli, Trevor
Ralph, A.
Sofronoff, K.
author_sort Sanders, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description A meta-analytic review of the Triple P-Positive Parenting program by Wilson et al., recently published in BMC Medicine, claimed to demonstrate that although Triple P is widely disseminated and adopted, the evidence attesting to the effectiveness of the program is not as convincing as it may appear. Although this review addresses the important issue of evaluation and reporting methods within evidence-based interventions, we contend that the Wilson et al. review contains a number of significant conceptual, methodological and interpretational inadequacies that render the key conclusions of their review problematic.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:32:39Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-19956
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:32:39Z
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central Ltd.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-199562017-09-13T15:58:24Z A commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: Redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P. Sanders, M. Pickering, J. Kirby, J. Turner, K. Morawska, A. Mazzucchelli, Trevor Ralph, A. Sofronoff, K. A meta-analytic review of the Triple P-Positive Parenting program by Wilson et al., recently published in BMC Medicine, claimed to demonstrate that although Triple P is widely disseminated and adopted, the evidence attesting to the effectiveness of the program is not as convincing as it may appear. Although this review addresses the important issue of evaluation and reporting methods within evidence-based interventions, we contend that the Wilson et al. review contains a number of significant conceptual, methodological and interpretational inadequacies that render the key conclusions of their review problematic. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19956 10.1186/1741-7015-10-145 BioMed Central Ltd. fulltext
spellingShingle Sanders, M.
Pickering, J.
Kirby, J.
Turner, K.
Morawska, A.
Mazzucchelli, Trevor
Ralph, A.
Sofronoff, K.
A commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: Redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P.
title A commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: Redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P.
title_full A commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: Redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P.
title_fullStr A commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: Redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P.
title_full_unstemmed A commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: Redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P.
title_short A commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: Redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for Triple P.
title_sort commentary on evidence-based parenting programs: redressing misconceptions of the empirical support for triple p.
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19956