A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?

This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-beh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schubert, E., Hargreaves, David, North, Adrian
Format: Journal Article
Published: Frontiers Research Foundation 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19952
_version_ 1848750174253350912
author Schubert, E.
Hargreaves, David
North, Adrian
author_facet Schubert, E.
Hargreaves, David
North, Adrian
author_sort Schubert, E.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-behavioral models of musical engagement are examined with the aim of identifying the underlying cognitive mechanisms and processes involved in musical experience. A “dynamical minimalism” approach (after Nowak, 2004) is applied to re-interpret musical engagement (listening, performing, composing, or imagining any of these) and to revise the latest version of the reciprocal-feedback model (RFM) of music processing. Specifically, a single cognitive mechanism of “spreading activation” through previously associated networks is proposed as a pleasurable outcome of musical engagement. This mechanism underlies the dynamic interaction of the various components of the RFM, and can thereby explain the generation of positive affects in the listener’s musical experience. This includes determinants of that experience stemming from the characteristics of the individual engaging in the musical activity (whether listener, composer, improviser, or performer), the situation and contexts (e.g., social factors), and the music (e.g., genre, structural features). The theory calls for new directions for future research, two being (1) further investigation of the components of the RFM to better understand musical experience and (2) more rigorous scrutiny of common findings about the salience of familiarity in musical experience and preference.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:32:38Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-19952
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:32:38Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-199522017-09-13T13:50:23Z A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything? Schubert, E. Hargreaves, David North, Adrian familiarity preference reciprocal-feedback model cognitive model neural networks spreading activation mind-body musical experience This paper examines the idea that attraction to music is generated at a cognitive level through the formation and activation of networks of interlinked “nodes.” Although the networks involved are vast, the basic mechanism for activating the links is relatively simple. Two comprehensive cognitive-behavioral models of musical engagement are examined with the aim of identifying the underlying cognitive mechanisms and processes involved in musical experience. A “dynamical minimalism” approach (after Nowak, 2004) is applied to re-interpret musical engagement (listening, performing, composing, or imagining any of these) and to revise the latest version of the reciprocal-feedback model (RFM) of music processing. Specifically, a single cognitive mechanism of “spreading activation” through previously associated networks is proposed as a pleasurable outcome of musical engagement. This mechanism underlies the dynamic interaction of the various components of the RFM, and can thereby explain the generation of positive affects in the listener’s musical experience. This includes determinants of that experience stemming from the characteristics of the individual engaging in the musical activity (whether listener, composer, improviser, or performer), the situation and contexts (e.g., social factors), and the music (e.g., genre, structural features). The theory calls for new directions for future research, two being (1) further investigation of the components of the RFM to better understand musical experience and (2) more rigorous scrutiny of common findings about the salience of familiarity in musical experience and preference. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19952 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00038 Frontiers Research Foundation fulltext
spellingShingle familiarity
preference
reciprocal-feedback model
cognitive model
neural networks
spreading activation
mind-body
musical experience
Schubert, E.
Hargreaves, David
North, Adrian
A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_full A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_fullStr A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_full_unstemmed A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_short A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
title_sort dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: is familiarity everything?
topic familiarity
preference
reciprocal-feedback model
cognitive model
neural networks
spreading activation
mind-body
musical experience
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19952