The murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology
We present the 21 cm power spectrum analysis approach of the Murchison Widefield Array Epoch of Reionization project. In this paper, we compare the outputs of multiple pipelines for the purpose of validating statistical limits cosmological hydrogen at redshifts between 6 and 12. Multiple independent...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Institute of Physics Publishing
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE140100316 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19602 |
| _version_ | 1848750078994415616 |
|---|---|
| author | Jacobs, D. Hazelton, B. Trott, C. Dillon, J. Pindor, B. Sullivan, I. Pober, J. Barry, N. Beardsley, A. Bernardi, G. Bowman, J. Briggs, F. Cappallo, R. Carroll, P. Corey, B. Oliveira-Costa, A. Emrich, D. Ewall-Wice, A. Feng, L. Gaensler, B. Goeke, R. Greenhill, L. Hewitt, J. Hurley-Walker, N. Johnston-Hollitt, M. Kaplan, D. Kasper, J. Kim, H. Kratzenberg, E. Lenc, E. Line, J. Loeb, A. Lonsdale, C. Lynch, M. McKinley, B. McWhirter, S. Mitchell, D. Morales, M. Morgan, E. Neben, A. Thyagarajan, N. Oberoi, D. Offringa, A. Ord, S. Paul, S. Prabu, T. Procopio, P. Riding, J. Rogers, A. Roshi, A. Shankar, N. Sethi, S. Srivani, K. Subrahmanyan, R. Tegmark, M. Tingay, Steven Waterson, M. Wayth, Randall Webster, R. Whitney, A. Williams, A. Williams, C. Wu, C. Wyithe, J. |
| author_facet | Jacobs, D. Hazelton, B. Trott, C. Dillon, J. Pindor, B. Sullivan, I. Pober, J. Barry, N. Beardsley, A. Bernardi, G. Bowman, J. Briggs, F. Cappallo, R. Carroll, P. Corey, B. Oliveira-Costa, A. Emrich, D. Ewall-Wice, A. Feng, L. Gaensler, B. Goeke, R. Greenhill, L. Hewitt, J. Hurley-Walker, N. Johnston-Hollitt, M. Kaplan, D. Kasper, J. Kim, H. Kratzenberg, E. Lenc, E. Line, J. Loeb, A. Lonsdale, C. Lynch, M. McKinley, B. McWhirter, S. Mitchell, D. Morales, M. Morgan, E. Neben, A. Thyagarajan, N. Oberoi, D. Offringa, A. Ord, S. Paul, S. Prabu, T. Procopio, P. Riding, J. Rogers, A. Roshi, A. Shankar, N. Sethi, S. Srivani, K. Subrahmanyan, R. Tegmark, M. Tingay, Steven Waterson, M. Wayth, Randall Webster, R. Whitney, A. Williams, A. Williams, C. Wu, C. Wyithe, J. |
| author_sort | Jacobs, D. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | We present the 21 cm power spectrum analysis approach of the Murchison Widefield Array Epoch of Reionization project. In this paper, we compare the outputs of multiple pipelines for the purpose of validating statistical limits cosmological hydrogen at redshifts between 6 and 12. Multiple independent data calibration and reduction pipelines are used to make power spectrum limits on a fiducial night of data. Comparing the outputs of imaging and power spectrum stages highlights differences in calibration, foreground subtraction, and power spectrum calculation. The power spectra found using these different methods span a space defined by the various tradeoffs between speed, accuracy, and systematic control. Lessons learned from comparing the pipelines range from the algorithmic to the prosaically mundane; all demonstrate the many pitfalls of neglecting reproducibility. We briefly discuss the way these different methods attempt to handle the question of evaluating a significant detection in the presence of foregrounds. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:31:07Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-19602 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:31:07Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Institute of Physics Publishing |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-196022022-09-06T04:20:29Z The murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology Jacobs, D. Hazelton, B. Trott, C. Dillon, J. Pindor, B. Sullivan, I. Pober, J. Barry, N. Beardsley, A. Bernardi, G. Bowman, J. Briggs, F. Cappallo, R. Carroll, P. Corey, B. Oliveira-Costa, A. Emrich, D. Ewall-Wice, A. Feng, L. Gaensler, B. Goeke, R. Greenhill, L. Hewitt, J. Hurley-Walker, N. Johnston-Hollitt, M. Kaplan, D. Kasper, J. Kim, H. Kratzenberg, E. Lenc, E. Line, J. Loeb, A. Lonsdale, C. Lynch, M. McKinley, B. McWhirter, S. Mitchell, D. Morales, M. Morgan, E. Neben, A. Thyagarajan, N. Oberoi, D. Offringa, A. Ord, S. Paul, S. Prabu, T. Procopio, P. Riding, J. Rogers, A. Roshi, A. Shankar, N. Sethi, S. Srivani, K. Subrahmanyan, R. Tegmark, M. Tingay, Steven Waterson, M. Wayth, Randall Webster, R. Whitney, A. Williams, A. Williams, C. Wu, C. Wyithe, J. We present the 21 cm power spectrum analysis approach of the Murchison Widefield Array Epoch of Reionization project. In this paper, we compare the outputs of multiple pipelines for the purpose of validating statistical limits cosmological hydrogen at redshifts between 6 and 12. Multiple independent data calibration and reduction pipelines are used to make power spectrum limits on a fiducial night of data. Comparing the outputs of imaging and power spectrum stages highlights differences in calibration, foreground subtraction, and power spectrum calculation. The power spectra found using these different methods span a space defined by the various tradeoffs between speed, accuracy, and systematic control. Lessons learned from comparing the pipelines range from the algorithmic to the prosaically mundane; all demonstrate the many pitfalls of neglecting reproducibility. We briefly discuss the way these different methods attempt to handle the question of evaluating a significant detection in the presence of foregrounds. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19602 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/114 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE140100316 Institute of Physics Publishing fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Jacobs, D. Hazelton, B. Trott, C. Dillon, J. Pindor, B. Sullivan, I. Pober, J. Barry, N. Beardsley, A. Bernardi, G. Bowman, J. Briggs, F. Cappallo, R. Carroll, P. Corey, B. Oliveira-Costa, A. Emrich, D. Ewall-Wice, A. Feng, L. Gaensler, B. Goeke, R. Greenhill, L. Hewitt, J. Hurley-Walker, N. Johnston-Hollitt, M. Kaplan, D. Kasper, J. Kim, H. Kratzenberg, E. Lenc, E. Line, J. Loeb, A. Lonsdale, C. Lynch, M. McKinley, B. McWhirter, S. Mitchell, D. Morales, M. Morgan, E. Neben, A. Thyagarajan, N. Oberoi, D. Offringa, A. Ord, S. Paul, S. Prabu, T. Procopio, P. Riding, J. Rogers, A. Roshi, A. Shankar, N. Sethi, S. Srivani, K. Subrahmanyan, R. Tegmark, M. Tingay, Steven Waterson, M. Wayth, Randall Webster, R. Whitney, A. Williams, A. Williams, C. Wu, C. Wyithe, J. The murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology |
| title | The murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology |
| title_full | The murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology |
| title_fullStr | The murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology |
| title_full_unstemmed | The murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology |
| title_short | The murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology |
| title_sort | murchison widefield array 21 cm power spectrum analysis methodology |
| url | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE140100316 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19602 |