Comparison of time-domain methods for two-end PD location in power cables

Accuracy comparison of various time domain methods for locating of partial discharge (PD) in power cables is presented in this paper. The PD location is based on the measurement from two-end of the cable. The defect in the cable is located from the arrival time interval between the initial waves of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Firdaus, A., Mardiana, R., Muyeen, S.M.
Format: Conference Paper
Published: 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19489
_version_ 1848750047611584512
author Firdaus, A.
Mardiana, R.
Muyeen, S.M.
author_facet Firdaus, A.
Mardiana, R.
Muyeen, S.M.
author_sort Firdaus, A.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Accuracy comparison of various time domain methods for locating of partial discharge (PD) in power cables is presented in this paper. The PD location is based on the measurement from two-end of the cable. The defect in the cable is located from the arrival time interval between the initial waves of a PD pulse. To estimate the time-of arrival, various methods such as peak detection, 50% pulse peak detection, threshold detection, Akaike Information Criterion, Energy Criterion, Gabor Centroid, and cross correlation are considered. The computer simulation has been carried out using a 20 kV, 1000-m underground cable. After comparison, it is found that peak detection has better performance than other methods.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:30:37Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-19489
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:30:37Z
publishDate 2012
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-194892017-09-13T13:47:28Z Comparison of time-domain methods for two-end PD location in power cables Firdaus, A. Mardiana, R. Muyeen, S.M. Accuracy comparison of various time domain methods for locating of partial discharge (PD) in power cables is presented in this paper. The PD location is based on the measurement from two-end of the cable. The defect in the cable is located from the arrival time interval between the initial waves of a PD pulse. To estimate the time-of arrival, various methods such as peak detection, 50% pulse peak detection, threshold detection, Akaike Information Criterion, Energy Criterion, Gabor Centroid, and cross correlation are considered. The computer simulation has been carried out using a 20 kV, 1000-m underground cable. After comparison, it is found that peak detection has better performance than other methods. 2012 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19489 10.1109/CCECE.2012.6335064 restricted
spellingShingle Firdaus, A.
Mardiana, R.
Muyeen, S.M.
Comparison of time-domain methods for two-end PD location in power cables
title Comparison of time-domain methods for two-end PD location in power cables
title_full Comparison of time-domain methods for two-end PD location in power cables
title_fullStr Comparison of time-domain methods for two-end PD location in power cables
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of time-domain methods for two-end PD location in power cables
title_short Comparison of time-domain methods for two-end PD location in power cables
title_sort comparison of time-domain methods for two-end pd location in power cables
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/19489