Characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction.

Texture, i.e. preferred orientation, can cause large systematic errors in quantitative analysis of crystalline materials using x-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data. Various mathematical forms have been proposed for the application of preferred orientation corrections. The most promising of these app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sitepu, Husinsyah
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Curtin University 1991
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/1897
_version_ 1848743800075190272
author Sitepu, Husinsyah
author_facet Sitepu, Husinsyah
author_sort Sitepu, Husinsyah
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Texture, i.e. preferred orientation, can cause large systematic errors in quantitative analysis of crystalline materials using x-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data. Various mathematical forms have been proposed for the application of preferred orientation corrections. The most promising of these appears to be the single-parameter March (1932) model proposed by Dollase (1986).Li and O'Connor (1989) applied the March model to determine the level of preferred orientation in various gibbsites using two procedures. The first involved the Rietveld (1969) least squares pattern-fitting method. Each pattern was Rietveld-analysed in two ways, initially assuming random orientation of the crystallites and subsequently with the March model. The second procedure for preferred orientation analysis, described here as the line ratio method, determines preferred orientation factors according to the intensity ratios of carefully selected line pairs.In the thesis the procedures proposed by Li and O'Connor for texture analysis have been evaluated with XRPD data sets for molybdite, calcite and kaolinite. The results indicate that while the March formula improves agreement between the' calculated and measured patterns in Rietveld analysis, other forms of systematic error in the intensity data appear to limit the effectiveness of the March formula in general. It has been found also that the line ratio method improves agreement between the data sets, but less effectively than the Rietveld method. It is proposed that extinction is likely to be the most influential source of systematic error competing with texture.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T05:51:19Z
format Thesis
id curtin-20.500.11937-1897
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
language English
last_indexed 2025-11-14T05:51:19Z
publishDate 1991
publisher Curtin University
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-18972019-03-27T01:24:40Z Characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction. Sitepu, Husinsyah texture March model x-ray powder diffraction crystalline materials preferred orientation Texture, i.e. preferred orientation, can cause large systematic errors in quantitative analysis of crystalline materials using x-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data. Various mathematical forms have been proposed for the application of preferred orientation corrections. The most promising of these appears to be the single-parameter March (1932) model proposed by Dollase (1986).Li and O'Connor (1989) applied the March model to determine the level of preferred orientation in various gibbsites using two procedures. The first involved the Rietveld (1969) least squares pattern-fitting method. Each pattern was Rietveld-analysed in two ways, initially assuming random orientation of the crystallites and subsequently with the March model. The second procedure for preferred orientation analysis, described here as the line ratio method, determines preferred orientation factors according to the intensity ratios of carefully selected line pairs.In the thesis the procedures proposed by Li and O'Connor for texture analysis have been evaluated with XRPD data sets for molybdite, calcite and kaolinite. The results indicate that while the March formula improves agreement between the' calculated and measured patterns in Rietveld analysis, other forms of systematic error in the intensity data appear to limit the effectiveness of the March formula in general. It has been found also that the line ratio method improves agreement between the data sets, but less effectively than the Rietveld method. It is proposed that extinction is likely to be the most influential source of systematic error competing with texture. 1991 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/1897 en Curtin University fulltext
spellingShingle texture
March model
x-ray powder diffraction
crystalline materials
preferred orientation
Sitepu, Husinsyah
Characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction.
title Characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction.
title_full Characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction.
title_fullStr Characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction.
title_full_unstemmed Characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction.
title_short Characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction.
title_sort characterisation of preferred orientation in crystalline materials by x-ray powder diffraction.
topic texture
March model
x-ray powder diffraction
crystalline materials
preferred orientation
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/1897