Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation

Objective: This research aimed to identify the most frequently occurring human factors contributing to maintenance-related failures within a petroleum industry organization. Commonality between failures will assist in understanding reliability in maintenance processes, thereby preventing accidents i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonovsky, Ari, Pollock, Clare, Straker, Leon
Format: Journal Article
Published: Sage Publications, Inc. 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/18625
_version_ 1848749798977437696
author Antonovsky, Ari
Pollock, Clare
Straker, Leon
author_facet Antonovsky, Ari
Pollock, Clare
Straker, Leon
author_sort Antonovsky, Ari
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: This research aimed to identify the most frequently occurring human factors contributing to maintenance-related failures within a petroleum industry organization. Commonality between failures will assist in understanding reliability in maintenance processes, thereby preventing accidents in high-hazard domains. Background: Methods exist for understanding the human factors contributing to accidents. Their application in a maintenance context mainly has been advanced in aviation and nuclear power. Maintenance in the petroleum industry provides a different context for investigating the role that human factors play in influencing outcomes. It is therefore worth investigating the contributing human factors to improve our understanding of both human factors in reliability and the factors specific to this domain. Method: Detailed analyses were conducted of maintenance- related failures (N = 38) in a petroleum company using structured interviews with maintenance technicians. The interview structure was based on the Human Factor Investigation Tool (HFIT), which in turn was based on Rasmussen’s model of human malfunction .Results: A mean of 9.5 factors per incident was identified across the cases investigated. The three most frequent human factors contributing to the maintenance failures were found to be assumption (79% of cases), design and maintenance (71%), and communication (66%).Conclusion: HFIT proved to be a useful instrument for identifying the pattern of human factors that recurred most frequently in maintenance-related failures. Application: The high frequency of failures attributed to assumptions and communication demonstrated the importance of problem-solving abilities and organizational communication in a domain where maintenance personnel have a high degree of autonomy and a wide geographical distribution.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:26:40Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-18625
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:26:40Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Sage Publications, Inc.
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-186252017-09-13T13:46:02Z Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation Antonovsky, Ari Pollock, Clare Straker, Leon equipment design reliability HFIT organizational communication Assumption Objective: This research aimed to identify the most frequently occurring human factors contributing to maintenance-related failures within a petroleum industry organization. Commonality between failures will assist in understanding reliability in maintenance processes, thereby preventing accidents in high-hazard domains. Background: Methods exist for understanding the human factors contributing to accidents. Their application in a maintenance context mainly has been advanced in aviation and nuclear power. Maintenance in the petroleum industry provides a different context for investigating the role that human factors play in influencing outcomes. It is therefore worth investigating the contributing human factors to improve our understanding of both human factors in reliability and the factors specific to this domain. Method: Detailed analyses were conducted of maintenance- related failures (N = 38) in a petroleum company using structured interviews with maintenance technicians. The interview structure was based on the Human Factor Investigation Tool (HFIT), which in turn was based on Rasmussen’s model of human malfunction .Results: A mean of 9.5 factors per incident was identified across the cases investigated. The three most frequent human factors contributing to the maintenance failures were found to be assumption (79% of cases), design and maintenance (71%), and communication (66%).Conclusion: HFIT proved to be a useful instrument for identifying the pattern of human factors that recurred most frequently in maintenance-related failures. Application: The high frequency of failures attributed to assumptions and communication demonstrated the importance of problem-solving abilities and organizational communication in a domain where maintenance personnel have a high degree of autonomy and a wide geographical distribution. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/18625 10.1177/0018720813491424 Sage Publications, Inc. fulltext
spellingShingle equipment design
reliability
HFIT
organizational communication
Assumption
Antonovsky, Ari
Pollock, Clare
Straker, Leon
Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation
title Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation
title_full Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation
title_fullStr Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation
title_short Identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation
title_sort identification of the human factors contributing to maintenance failures in a petroleum operation
topic equipment design
reliability
HFIT
organizational communication
Assumption
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/18625