Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer

Background: Recent trials on rectal cancer have demonstrated significant improvements in local recurrence without improvements in overall survival. The aim of this paper was to define the influence of local recurrence on survival in a prospective series of patients who underwent R0 or R1 resections...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Platell, Cameron, Spilsbury, Katrina
Format: Journal Article
Published: John Wiley & Sons 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/16216
_version_ 1848749112204197888
author Platell, Cameron
Spilsbury, Katrina
author_facet Platell, Cameron
Spilsbury, Katrina
author_sort Platell, Cameron
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Background: Recent trials on rectal cancer have demonstrated significant improvements in local recurrence without improvements in overall survival. The aim of this paper was to define the influence of local recurrence on survival in a prospective series of patients who underwent R0 or R1 resections for rectal cancer. Methods: Patients presenting with rectal cancer from 1996 to 2012 were prospectively audited. The study included patients who underwent an R0 or R1 resection. Local recurrence was defined as cancer regrowth detected in the pelvis regardless of whether or not new metastases were found elsewhere. Kaplan–Meier curves, smoothed hazard functions and Cox models using both time since diagnosis and age as the time scale were used to define the influence of local recurrence on overall survival. Results: The study involved 483 patients, of mean age 66 years (standard deviation = 13) and a median follow-up of 5.2 years. The results at 5 years were overall survival 71% (95% confidence interval (CI) 66–75), local recurrence 7% (95% CI 5–10) and distant recurrence 18% (95% CI 14–22). Patients diagnosed with local recurrence died faster than patients diagnosed with either distant recurrence or no recurrence, and this was particularly obvious for younger patients (local hazard ratio (HR) 54, 95% CI 12–253 and distant HR19, 95% CI 4–80). Local recurrence that developed early following surgery also had worse survival outcomes. Conclusions: Within this cohort of rectal cancer patients, the early development of local recurrence was the single most important indicator of a reduced survival, and carried a worse prognosis than the development of distant metastases alone.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:15:45Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-16216
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:15:45Z
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-162162019-02-19T05:34:54Z Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer Platell, Cameron Spilsbury, Katrina overall survival survival rectal cancer local recurrence Background: Recent trials on rectal cancer have demonstrated significant improvements in local recurrence without improvements in overall survival. The aim of this paper was to define the influence of local recurrence on survival in a prospective series of patients who underwent R0 or R1 resections for rectal cancer. Methods: Patients presenting with rectal cancer from 1996 to 2012 were prospectively audited. The study included patients who underwent an R0 or R1 resection. Local recurrence was defined as cancer regrowth detected in the pelvis regardless of whether or not new metastases were found elsewhere. Kaplan–Meier curves, smoothed hazard functions and Cox models using both time since diagnosis and age as the time scale were used to define the influence of local recurrence on overall survival. Results: The study involved 483 patients, of mean age 66 years (standard deviation = 13) and a median follow-up of 5.2 years. The results at 5 years were overall survival 71% (95% confidence interval (CI) 66–75), local recurrence 7% (95% CI 5–10) and distant recurrence 18% (95% CI 14–22). Patients diagnosed with local recurrence died faster than patients diagnosed with either distant recurrence or no recurrence, and this was particularly obvious for younger patients (local hazard ratio (HR) 54, 95% CI 12–253 and distant HR19, 95% CI 4–80). Local recurrence that developed early following surgery also had worse survival outcomes. Conclusions: Within this cohort of rectal cancer patients, the early development of local recurrence was the single most important indicator of a reduced survival, and carried a worse prognosis than the development of distant metastases alone. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/16216 10.1111/ans.12214 John Wiley & Sons fulltext
spellingShingle overall survival
survival
rectal cancer
local recurrence
Platell, Cameron
Spilsbury, Katrina
Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer
title Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_full Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_fullStr Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_short Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer
title_sort influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer
topic overall survival
survival
rectal cancer
local recurrence
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/16216