Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data

Objective: To determine current contraceptive management by general practitioners in Australia. Design, setting and participants: Analysis of data from a random sample of 3910 Australian GPs who participated in the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) survey, a continuous cross-sectio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mazza, D., Harrison, C., Taft, A., Brijnath, Bianca, Britt, H., Hobbs, M., Stewart, K., Hussainy, S.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Australasian Medical Publishing 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15773
_version_ 1848748984310431744
author Mazza, D.
Harrison, C.
Taft, A.
Brijnath, Bianca
Britt, H.
Hobbs, M.
Stewart, K.
Hussainy, S.
author_facet Mazza, D.
Harrison, C.
Taft, A.
Brijnath, Bianca
Britt, H.
Hobbs, M.
Stewart, K.
Hussainy, S.
author_sort Mazza, D.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Objective: To determine current contraceptive management by general practitioners in Australia. Design, setting and participants: Analysis of data from a random sample of 3910 Australian GPs who participated in the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) survey, a continuous cross-sectional survey of GP activity, between April 2007 and March 2011. Consultations with female patients aged 12-54 years that involved all forms of contraception were analysed. Main outcome measures: GP and patient characteristics associated with the management of contraception; types of contraception used; rates of encounters involving emergency contraception. Results: Increased age, ethnicity, Indigenous status and holding a Commonwealth Health Care Card were significantly associated with low rates of encounters involving management of contraception. The combined oral contraceptive pill was the most frequently prescribed method of contraception, with moderate prescription of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), especially among women aged 34-54 years. Rates of consultations concerned with emergency contraception were low, but involved high rates of counselling, advice or education (48%) compared with encounters for general contraception (> 20%). Conclusion: A shift towards prescribing LARC, as recommended in clinical guidelines, has yet to occur in Australian general practice. Better understanding of patient and GP perspectives on contraceptive choices could lead to more effective contraceptive use.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:13:43Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-15773
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:13:43Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Australasian Medical Publishing
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-157732017-09-13T14:07:14Z Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data Mazza, D. Harrison, C. Taft, A. Brijnath, Bianca Britt, H. Hobbs, M. Stewart, K. Hussainy, S. Objective: To determine current contraceptive management by general practitioners in Australia. Design, setting and participants: Analysis of data from a random sample of 3910 Australian GPs who participated in the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) survey, a continuous cross-sectional survey of GP activity, between April 2007 and March 2011. Consultations with female patients aged 12-54 years that involved all forms of contraception were analysed. Main outcome measures: GP and patient characteristics associated with the management of contraception; types of contraception used; rates of encounters involving emergency contraception. Results: Increased age, ethnicity, Indigenous status and holding a Commonwealth Health Care Card were significantly associated with low rates of encounters involving management of contraception. The combined oral contraceptive pill was the most frequently prescribed method of contraception, with moderate prescription of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), especially among women aged 34-54 years. Rates of consultations concerned with emergency contraception were low, but involved high rates of counselling, advice or education (48%) compared with encounters for general contraception (> 20%). Conclusion: A shift towards prescribing LARC, as recommended in clinical guidelines, has yet to occur in Australian general practice. Better understanding of patient and GP perspectives on contraceptive choices could lead to more effective contraceptive use. 2012 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15773 10.5694/mja11.11599 Australasian Medical Publishing fulltext
spellingShingle Mazza, D.
Harrison, C.
Taft, A.
Brijnath, Bianca
Britt, H.
Hobbs, M.
Stewart, K.
Hussainy, S.
Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data
title Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data
title_full Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data
title_fullStr Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data
title_full_unstemmed Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data
title_short Current contraceptive management in Australian general practice: An analysis of BEACH data
title_sort current contraceptive management in australian general practice: an analysis of beach data
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15773