The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins

This study uses a sample of young Australian twins to examine whether the findings reported in Ashenfelter and Krueger (1994) and Miller, Mulvey, and Martin (1994) are robust to choice of sample and dependent variable. The economic return to schooling in Australia is between 5 and 7 percent when acc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miller, Paul, Mulvey, C., Martin, N.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier BV * North-Holland 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15697
_version_ 1848748964457742336
author Miller, Paul
Mulvey, C.
Martin, N.
author_facet Miller, Paul
Mulvey, C.
Martin, N.
author_sort Miller, Paul
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study uses a sample of young Australian twins to examine whether the findings reported in Ashenfelter and Krueger (1994) and Miller, Mulvey, and Martin (1994) are robust to choice of sample and dependent variable. The economic return to schooling in Australia is between 5 and 7 percent when account is taken of genetic and family effects using either fixed-effects models or the selection effects model of Ashenfelter and Krueger. Given the similarity of the findings in this and in related studies, it would appear that the models applied by Ashenfelter and Krueger are robust. Moreover, viewing the OLS and IV estimators as lower and upper bounds in the manner of Black, Berger and Scott (2000), it is shown that the bounds on the return to schooling in Australia are much tighter than in Ashenfelter and Krueger, and the return is bounded at a much lower level than in the US.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:13:24Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-15697
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:13:24Z
publishDate 2006
publisher Elsevier BV * North-Holland
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-156972017-09-13T16:05:29Z The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins Miller, Paul Mulvey, C. Martin, N. Twins Ability Wages This study uses a sample of young Australian twins to examine whether the findings reported in Ashenfelter and Krueger (1994) and Miller, Mulvey, and Martin (1994) are robust to choice of sample and dependent variable. The economic return to schooling in Australia is between 5 and 7 percent when account is taken of genetic and family effects using either fixed-effects models or the selection effects model of Ashenfelter and Krueger. Given the similarity of the findings in this and in related studies, it would appear that the models applied by Ashenfelter and Krueger are robust. Moreover, viewing the OLS and IV estimators as lower and upper bounds in the manner of Black, Berger and Scott (2000), it is shown that the bounds on the return to schooling in Australia are much tighter than in Ashenfelter and Krueger, and the return is bounded at a much lower level than in the US. 2006 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15697 10.1016/j.labeco.2004.10.008 Elsevier BV * North-Holland restricted
spellingShingle Twins
Ability
Wages
Miller, Paul
Mulvey, C.
Martin, N.
The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins
title The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins
title_full The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins
title_fullStr The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins
title_full_unstemmed The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins
title_short The return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young Australian twins
title_sort return to schooling: estimates from a sample of young australian twins
topic Twins
Ability
Wages
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15697