The recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms

The cornerstone of biological molecular techniques is the extraction of the intra- or extra-cellular component of interest. However, inefficiencies in the extraction method can lead to results that are not representative of the microbial population under investigation. It is particularly difficult t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zammit, Carla, Mutch, Lesley, Watling, Helen, Watkin, Elizabeth
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier Science BV 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15531
_version_ 1848748917919842304
author Zammit, Carla
Mutch, Lesley
Watling, Helen
Watkin, Elizabeth
author_facet Zammit, Carla
Mutch, Lesley
Watling, Helen
Watkin, Elizabeth
author_sort Zammit, Carla
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description The cornerstone of biological molecular techniques is the extraction of the intra- or extra-cellular component of interest. However, inefficiencies in the extraction method can lead to results that are not representative of the microbial population under investigation. It is particularly difficult to extract clean and pure samples of the cellular component of interest from the microbial inhabitants of low-pH, sulfidic environments, such as those found in biomining or acid mine drainage (AMD). A number of nucleic acid (NA) extraction methods were tested using microorganisms commonly found in biomining and AMD environments, including archaea and Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The different stages in the methods of NA extraction were investigated separately, including the: (i) removal of cells from pyrite, (ii) cell lysis and nucleic acid extraction, (iii) nucleic acid precipitation and (iv) RNA purification using, as appropriate, microscopy, spectrophotometry, agarose gel electrophoresis of NA, PCR, quantitative-PCR and quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR to assess the quality and quantity of the DNA and RNA.The relative percentage of NA recovered from each microorganism using the optimised method discussed in this paper returned the following percentage of NA per cell: At. ferrooxidans 91% ± 1.4%; At. caldus 91% ± 2.7%; L. ferriphilum 98% ± 1.2%; F. acidiphilum 83% ± 2.9%; and S. thermosulfidooxidans 79% ± 0.7%. Differences in lysis methods and NA precipitation greatly impacted the quality and quantity of the extracted NA. A method for the reliable, representative and reproducible extraction of NA from five strains of biomining and AMD microorganisms from pyrite and from liquid culture is described.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:12:40Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-15531
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:12:40Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Elsevier Science BV
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-155312019-02-19T04:25:52Z The recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms Zammit, Carla Mutch, Lesley Watling, Helen Watkin, Elizabeth RNA extraction Acid mine drainage Bioleaching DNA extraction Microorganisms Biomining The cornerstone of biological molecular techniques is the extraction of the intra- or extra-cellular component of interest. However, inefficiencies in the extraction method can lead to results that are not representative of the microbial population under investigation. It is particularly difficult to extract clean and pure samples of the cellular component of interest from the microbial inhabitants of low-pH, sulfidic environments, such as those found in biomining or acid mine drainage (AMD). A number of nucleic acid (NA) extraction methods were tested using microorganisms commonly found in biomining and AMD environments, including archaea and Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The different stages in the methods of NA extraction were investigated separately, including the: (i) removal of cells from pyrite, (ii) cell lysis and nucleic acid extraction, (iii) nucleic acid precipitation and (iv) RNA purification using, as appropriate, microscopy, spectrophotometry, agarose gel electrophoresis of NA, PCR, quantitative-PCR and quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR to assess the quality and quantity of the DNA and RNA.The relative percentage of NA recovered from each microorganism using the optimised method discussed in this paper returned the following percentage of NA per cell: At. ferrooxidans 91% ± 1.4%; At. caldus 91% ± 2.7%; L. ferriphilum 98% ± 1.2%; F. acidiphilum 83% ± 2.9%; and S. thermosulfidooxidans 79% ± 0.7%. Differences in lysis methods and NA precipitation greatly impacted the quality and quantity of the extracted NA. A method for the reliable, representative and reproducible extraction of NA from five strains of biomining and AMD microorganisms from pyrite and from liquid culture is described. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15531 10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.03.002 Elsevier Science BV fulltext
spellingShingle RNA extraction
Acid mine drainage
Bioleaching
DNA extraction
Microorganisms
Biomining
Zammit, Carla
Mutch, Lesley
Watling, Helen
Watkin, Elizabeth
The recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms
title The recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms
title_full The recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms
title_fullStr The recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms
title_full_unstemmed The recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms
title_short The recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms
title_sort recovery of nucleic acid from biomining and acid mine drainage microorganisms
topic RNA extraction
Acid mine drainage
Bioleaching
DNA extraction
Microorganisms
Biomining
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15531