Accuracy of activPAL Self-Attachment Methods

© 2016 Taylor & Francis.This study examined the accuracy of self-attachment of the activPAL activity monitor. A convenience sample of 50 participants self-attached the monitor after being presented with written material only (WMO) and then written and video (WV) instructions; and completed a que...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kringen, N., Healy, Genevieve, Winkler, E., Clark, B.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2016
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15393
_version_ 1848748880488824832
author Kringen, N.
Healy, Genevieve
Winkler, E.
Clark, B.
author_facet Kringen, N.
Healy, Genevieve
Winkler, E.
Clark, B.
author_sort Kringen, N.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description © 2016 Taylor & Francis.This study examined the accuracy of self-attachment of the activPAL activity monitor. A convenience sample of 50 participants self-attached the monitor after being presented with written material only (WMO) and then written and video (WV) instructions; and completed a questionnaire regarding the acceptability of the instructional methods. Participants positioned the monitor lower than the instructed position on the thigh (WMO -5.15 ± 2.75 cm, WV -4.16 ± 2.15 cm; p = .008 difference) and approximately 2 cm laterally from the thigh midline (WMO 1.90 ± 0.92 cm; WV 2.08 ± 1.24 cm). The orientation of the device was positioned correctly along the midline (within < 1° of vertical). Acceptability was high for both instructional methods although preference was shown for the WV instruction. In conclusion, participants consistently self-attached the activPAL close to the intended placement with either instructional method. The addition of video instruction produced a slightly more accurate attachment and was preferred by the participants.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:12:04Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-15393
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:12:04Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-153932017-09-13T13:40:19Z Accuracy of activPAL Self-Attachment Methods Kringen, N. Healy, Genevieve Winkler, E. Clark, B. © 2016 Taylor & Francis.This study examined the accuracy of self-attachment of the activPAL activity monitor. A convenience sample of 50 participants self-attached the monitor after being presented with written material only (WMO) and then written and video (WV) instructions; and completed a questionnaire regarding the acceptability of the instructional methods. Participants positioned the monitor lower than the instructed position on the thigh (WMO -5.15 ± 2.75 cm, WV -4.16 ± 2.15 cm; p = .008 difference) and approximately 2 cm laterally from the thigh midline (WMO 1.90 ± 0.92 cm; WV 2.08 ± 1.24 cm). The orientation of the device was positioned correctly along the midline (within < 1° of vertical). Acceptability was high for both instructional methods although preference was shown for the WV instruction. In conclusion, participants consistently self-attached the activPAL close to the intended placement with either instructional method. The addition of video instruction produced a slightly more accurate attachment and was preferred by the participants. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15393 10.1080/1091367X.2016.1189916 Routledge restricted
spellingShingle Kringen, N.
Healy, Genevieve
Winkler, E.
Clark, B.
Accuracy of activPAL Self-Attachment Methods
title Accuracy of activPAL Self-Attachment Methods
title_full Accuracy of activPAL Self-Attachment Methods
title_fullStr Accuracy of activPAL Self-Attachment Methods
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of activPAL Self-Attachment Methods
title_short Accuracy of activPAL Self-Attachment Methods
title_sort accuracy of activpal self-attachment methods
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15393