Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks

This study assessed the validity of a tri-axial accelerometer worn on the upper body to estimate peak forces during running and change-of-direction tasks. Seventeen participants completed four different running and change-of-direction tasks (0°, 45°, 90°, and 180°; five trials per condition). Peak c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wundersitz, D., Netto, Kevin, Aisbett, B., Gastin, P.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Routledge 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15039
_version_ 1848748786766053376
author Wundersitz, D.
Netto, Kevin
Aisbett, B.
Gastin, P.
author_facet Wundersitz, D.
Netto, Kevin
Aisbett, B.
Gastin, P.
author_sort Wundersitz, D.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study assessed the validity of a tri-axial accelerometer worn on the upper body to estimate peak forces during running and change-of-direction tasks. Seventeen participants completed four different running and change-of-direction tasks (0°, 45°, 90°, and 180°; five trials per condition). Peak crania-caudal and resultant acceleration was converted to force and compared against peak force plate ground reaction force (GRF) in two formats (raw and smoothed). The resultant smoothed (10 Hz) and crania-caudal raw (except 180°) accelerometer values were not significantly different to resultant and vertical GRF for all running and change-of-direction tasks, respectively. Resultant accelerometer measures showed no to strong significant correlations (r = 0.00–0.76) and moderate to large measurement errors (coefficient of variation [CV] = 11.7–23.9%). Crania-caudal accelerometer measures showed small to moderate correlations (r = − 0.26 to 0.39) and moderate to large measurement errors (CV = 15.0–20.6%). Accelerometers, within integrated micro-technology tracking devices and worn on the upper body, can provide a relative measure of peak impact force experienced during running and two change-of-direction tasks (45° and 90°) provided that resultant smoothed values are used.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:10:35Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-15039
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:10:35Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Routledge
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-150392017-09-13T15:01:40Z Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks Wundersitz, D. Netto, Kevin Aisbett, B. Gastin, P. uni-axial accelerometer and tri-axial accelerometer geographic information systems acceleration agreement Accuracy This study assessed the validity of a tri-axial accelerometer worn on the upper body to estimate peak forces during running and change-of-direction tasks. Seventeen participants completed four different running and change-of-direction tasks (0°, 45°, 90°, and 180°; five trials per condition). Peak crania-caudal and resultant acceleration was converted to force and compared against peak force plate ground reaction force (GRF) in two formats (raw and smoothed). The resultant smoothed (10 Hz) and crania-caudal raw (except 180°) accelerometer values were not significantly different to resultant and vertical GRF for all running and change-of-direction tasks, respectively. Resultant accelerometer measures showed no to strong significant correlations (r = 0.00–0.76) and moderate to large measurement errors (coefficient of variation [CV] = 11.7–23.9%). Crania-caudal accelerometer measures showed small to moderate correlations (r = − 0.26 to 0.39) and moderate to large measurement errors (CV = 15.0–20.6%). Accelerometers, within integrated micro-technology tracking devices and worn on the upper body, can provide a relative measure of peak impact force experienced during running and two change-of-direction tasks (45° and 90°) provided that resultant smoothed values are used. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15039 10.1080/14763141.2013.811284 Routledge restricted
spellingShingle uni-axial accelerometer and tri-axial accelerometer
geographic information systems
acceleration
agreement
Accuracy
Wundersitz, D.
Netto, Kevin
Aisbett, B.
Gastin, P.
Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks
title Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks
title_full Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks
title_fullStr Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks
title_full_unstemmed Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks
title_short Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks
title_sort validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks
topic uni-axial accelerometer and tri-axial accelerometer
geographic information systems
acceleration
agreement
Accuracy
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/15039