Prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal

Prevalence, self-efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self-management: effects of a breastfeeding journal. Aim. This paper repoprts an assessment of the effects of a breastfeeding journal on breastfeeding prevalence and perceptions of conflicting advice, self-management and self-effica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hauck, Yvonne, Hall, W., Jones, C.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/14776
_version_ 1848748713622634496
author Hauck, Yvonne
Hall, W.
Jones, C.
author_facet Hauck, Yvonne
Hall, W.
Jones, C.
author_sort Hauck, Yvonne
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Prevalence, self-efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self-management: effects of a breastfeeding journal. Aim. This paper repoprts an assessment of the effects of a breastfeeding journal on breastfeeding prevalence and perceptions of conflicting advice, self-management and self-efficacy. Background. Breastfeeding prevalence rates in most developed countries are not meeting recommendations. Women's concerns about inconsistent advice, limited involvement in decision-making accessibility of information and inappropriate follow - up have been recognised. Research on evaluation of interventions addressing these concerns and including antenatal and early postnatal periods is required. Method. An intervention study was conducted from July 2003 to April 2004, with control and intervention groups recruited sequentially. The intervention group received a breastfeeding journal at 36 weeks antenatally in breastfeeding classes that were attended at different times by intervention and control group members. The intervention and control groups were compared during postpartum hospitalization and 12 weeks for breastfeeding prevalence and perceptions of self-efficacy, conflicting advice and self - management. Findings. No statistically significant differences were noted between the intervention and control groups in breastfeeding prevalence at 12 weeks of self-efficacy during hospitalization. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in conflicting advice at both times. Although conflicting advice continues to present a dilemma for women, levels of conflicting advice did not explain breastfeeding self-efficacy. Breastfeeding self - management was a statistically significant contributor to breastfeeding prevalence prior to the addition of breastfeeding self-efficacy. Conclusions. Womens perceptions of their ability to manage and be actively involved in decision - making explained breastfeeding prevalence at 12 - week postpartum. Efforts to encourage women's involvement in decision - making about breastfeeding are a useful strategy to promote breastfeeding.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:09:25Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-14776
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:09:25Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-147762017-09-13T15:59:27Z Prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal Hauck, Yvonne Hall, W. Jones, C. Breastfeeding self-efficacy conflicting advice midwifery breastfeeding prevalence intervention study self-management Prevalence, self-efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self-management: effects of a breastfeeding journal. Aim. This paper repoprts an assessment of the effects of a breastfeeding journal on breastfeeding prevalence and perceptions of conflicting advice, self-management and self-efficacy. Background. Breastfeeding prevalence rates in most developed countries are not meeting recommendations. Women's concerns about inconsistent advice, limited involvement in decision-making accessibility of information and inappropriate follow - up have been recognised. Research on evaluation of interventions addressing these concerns and including antenatal and early postnatal periods is required. Method. An intervention study was conducted from July 2003 to April 2004, with control and intervention groups recruited sequentially. The intervention group received a breastfeeding journal at 36 weeks antenatally in breastfeeding classes that were attended at different times by intervention and control group members. The intervention and control groups were compared during postpartum hospitalization and 12 weeks for breastfeeding prevalence and perceptions of self-efficacy, conflicting advice and self - management. Findings. No statistically significant differences were noted between the intervention and control groups in breastfeeding prevalence at 12 weeks of self-efficacy during hospitalization. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in conflicting advice at both times. Although conflicting advice continues to present a dilemma for women, levels of conflicting advice did not explain breastfeeding self-efficacy. Breastfeeding self - management was a statistically significant contributor to breastfeeding prevalence prior to the addition of breastfeeding self-efficacy. Conclusions. Womens perceptions of their ability to manage and be actively involved in decision - making explained breastfeeding prevalence at 12 - week postpartum. Efforts to encourage women's involvement in decision - making about breastfeeding are a useful strategy to promote breastfeeding. 2007 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/14776 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04136.x Blackwell Publishing Ltd restricted
spellingShingle Breastfeeding
self-efficacy
conflicting advice
midwifery
breastfeeding prevalence
intervention study
self-management
Hauck, Yvonne
Hall, W.
Jones, C.
Prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal
title Prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal
title_full Prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal
title_fullStr Prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal
title_short Prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal
title_sort prevalence, self - efficacy and perceptions of conflicting advice and self - management: effects of a breastfeeding journal
topic Breastfeeding
self-efficacy
conflicting advice
midwifery
breastfeeding prevalence
intervention study
self-management
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/14776