Radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls
Mountain biking (MB), unlike road cycling (RC) involves exposure to ground impact bone strain and requires upper-body muscle forces to maintain stability over uneven terrain and therefore may have differential effects on radial bone structure and strength. This study aimed to compare serum bone turn...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor and Francis Group
2014
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/14100 |
| _version_ | 1848748530599985152 |
|---|---|
| author | McVeigh, Joanne Meiring, R. Cimato, A. Micklesfield, L. Oosthuyse, T. |
| author_facet | McVeigh, Joanne Meiring, R. Cimato, A. Micklesfield, L. Oosthuyse, T. |
| author_sort | McVeigh, Joanne |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Mountain biking (MB), unlike road cycling (RC) involves exposure to ground impact bone strain and requires upper-body muscle forces to maintain stability over uneven terrain and therefore may have differential effects on radial bone structure and strength. This study aimed to compare serum bone turnover marker concentration, 1-repetition maximum muscle strength and the radial proximal (diaphysis) and distal (metaphysis) bone structure [bone mineral content, total and cortical area (CoA), density and thickness, diameter and circumference], strength strain indices and muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) between 30 male cyclists (18–34 years) MB (n = 10), RC (n = 10) and non-athletes controls (CON, n = 10). Differences were assessed by ANOVA and an ANCOVA (adjusting for body mass and height) where appropriate. MB radii were characterised by significantly stronger (14–16%), denser (9–27%) and larger (10%) metaphyses and stronger (22–23%) and larger (11–13%) diaphyses compared to RC and CON. RC had significantly 7% higher strength indices and 4% greater CoA and thickness than CON at the diaphysis, with no differences for other bone measurements. Serum C-terminal telopeptides of type-1 collagen concentration (bone resorption marker) was higher in RC than MB (p < 0.05) and above the age-reference range. MCSA and strength were greater in MB than RC (p < 0.05). Muscle forces generated during RC appear to produce an osteogenic stimulus to increase radial bone strength indices with minimal improvement in bone structure. However greater resorptive activity in RC suggests inadequate loading to support bone maintenance. In conclusion, bone loading, muscle size and strength of MB are superior to RC. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:06:31Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-14100 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:06:31Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-141002017-09-13T14:04:52Z Radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls McVeigh, Joanne Meiring, R. Cimato, A. Micklesfield, L. Oosthuyse, T. Mountain biking (MB), unlike road cycling (RC) involves exposure to ground impact bone strain and requires upper-body muscle forces to maintain stability over uneven terrain and therefore may have differential effects on radial bone structure and strength. This study aimed to compare serum bone turnover marker concentration, 1-repetition maximum muscle strength and the radial proximal (diaphysis) and distal (metaphysis) bone structure [bone mineral content, total and cortical area (CoA), density and thickness, diameter and circumference], strength strain indices and muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) between 30 male cyclists (18–34 years) MB (n = 10), RC (n = 10) and non-athletes controls (CON, n = 10). Differences were assessed by ANOVA and an ANCOVA (adjusting for body mass and height) where appropriate. MB radii were characterised by significantly stronger (14–16%), denser (9–27%) and larger (10%) metaphyses and stronger (22–23%) and larger (11–13%) diaphyses compared to RC and CON. RC had significantly 7% higher strength indices and 4% greater CoA and thickness than CON at the diaphysis, with no differences for other bone measurements. Serum C-terminal telopeptides of type-1 collagen concentration (bone resorption marker) was higher in RC than MB (p < 0.05) and above the age-reference range. MCSA and strength were greater in MB than RC (p < 0.05). Muscle forces generated during RC appear to produce an osteogenic stimulus to increase radial bone strength indices with minimal improvement in bone structure. However greater resorptive activity in RC suggests inadequate loading to support bone maintenance. In conclusion, bone loading, muscle size and strength of MB are superior to RC. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/14100 10.1080/17461391.2014.933881 Taylor and Francis Group restricted |
| spellingShingle | McVeigh, Joanne Meiring, R. Cimato, A. Micklesfield, L. Oosthuyse, T. Radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls |
| title | Radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls |
| title_full | Radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls |
| title_fullStr | Radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls |
| title_full_unstemmed | Radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls |
| title_short | Radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls |
| title_sort | radial bone size and strength indices in male road cyclists, mountain bikers and controls |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/14100 |