Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome
Purpose: To explore relationships between family quality of life, day occupations and activities of daily living (ADL) of young persons with Down syndrome.Method: Data were collected from 150 families with a young person with Down syndrome aged 16–30 years participating in the Down syndrome “Needs O...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Springer Medizin
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/13602 |
| _version_ | 1848748389284446208 |
|---|---|
| author | Foley, K.-R. Girdler, Sonya Downs, Jennepher Jacoby, P. Bourke, J. Lennox, N. Einfeld, S. Llewellyn, G. Parmenter, T. Leonard, H. |
| author_facet | Foley, K.-R. Girdler, Sonya Downs, Jennepher Jacoby, P. Bourke, J. Lennox, N. Einfeld, S. Llewellyn, G. Parmenter, T. Leonard, H. |
| author_sort | Foley, K.-R. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Purpose: To explore relationships between family quality of life, day occupations and activities of daily living (ADL) of young persons with Down syndrome.Method: Data were collected from 150 families with a young person with Down syndrome aged 16–30 years participating in the Down syndrome “Needs Opinions Wishes” database. Data described the young person’s characteristics (including functional abilities, behaviour and day occupations) and family characteristics (including income, family and community supports and quality of life).Results: Compared to families of young people attending open employment, families of young people participating in sheltered employment tended to report poorer family quality of life, after adjusting for personal characteristics, behaviour and income (coeff −6.78, 95 % CI −14.38, 0.81). Family supports reduced this relationship (coeff −6.00, 95 % CI −12.76, 0.76). Families of young people with greater functioning in ADL reported better family quality of life regardless of personal and environmental factors (coeff 0.45, 95 % CI 0.05, 0.85) and inclusion of family factors such as family supports reduced this association (coeff 0.29, 95 % CI −0.10, 0.67).Conclusions: Participation of young people with Down syndrome in open employment may positively influence family quality of life. Services that facilitate functioning in ADL and assist the families in accessing suitable family supports have the potential to positively influence family quality of life. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:04:16Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-13602 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:04:16Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Springer Medizin |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-136022017-09-13T15:01:41Z Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome Foley, K.-R. Girdler, Sonya Downs, Jennepher Jacoby, P. Bourke, J. Lennox, N. Einfeld, S. Llewellyn, G. Parmenter, T. Leonard, H. Participation Intellectual disability Employment Quality of life Purpose: To explore relationships between family quality of life, day occupations and activities of daily living (ADL) of young persons with Down syndrome.Method: Data were collected from 150 families with a young person with Down syndrome aged 16–30 years participating in the Down syndrome “Needs Opinions Wishes” database. Data described the young person’s characteristics (including functional abilities, behaviour and day occupations) and family characteristics (including income, family and community supports and quality of life).Results: Compared to families of young people attending open employment, families of young people participating in sheltered employment tended to report poorer family quality of life, after adjusting for personal characteristics, behaviour and income (coeff −6.78, 95 % CI −14.38, 0.81). Family supports reduced this relationship (coeff −6.00, 95 % CI −12.76, 0.76). Families of young people with greater functioning in ADL reported better family quality of life regardless of personal and environmental factors (coeff 0.45, 95 % CI 0.05, 0.85) and inclusion of family factors such as family supports reduced this association (coeff 0.29, 95 % CI −0.10, 0.67).Conclusions: Participation of young people with Down syndrome in open employment may positively influence family quality of life. Services that facilitate functioning in ADL and assist the families in accessing suitable family supports have the potential to positively influence family quality of life. 2014 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/13602 10.1007/s00127-013-0812-x Springer Medizin restricted |
| spellingShingle | Participation Intellectual disability Employment Quality of life Foley, K.-R. Girdler, Sonya Downs, Jennepher Jacoby, P. Bourke, J. Lennox, N. Einfeld, S. Llewellyn, G. Parmenter, T. Leonard, H. Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome |
| title | Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome |
| title_full | Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome |
| title_fullStr | Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome |
| title_full_unstemmed | Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome |
| title_short | Relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with Down syndrome |
| title_sort | relationship between family quality of life and day occupations of young people with down syndrome |
| topic | Participation Intellectual disability Employment Quality of life |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/13602 |