The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce
Background: There is very little information available on a national level as to the number of people exposed to specific asthmagens in workplaces. Methods: We conducted a national telephone survey in Australia to investigate the prevalence of current occupational exposure to 277 asthmagens, assembl...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
BioMed Central Ltd
2016
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/13175 |
| _version_ | 1848748277337423872 |
|---|---|
| author | Fritschi, Lin Crewe, Julie Darcey, Ellie Reid, Alison Glass, D. Benke, G. Driscoll, T. Peters, S. Si, Si Abramson, M. Carey, Renee |
| author_facet | Fritschi, Lin Crewe, Julie Darcey, Ellie Reid, Alison Glass, D. Benke, G. Driscoll, T. Peters, S. Si, Si Abramson, M. Carey, Renee |
| author_sort | Fritschi, Lin |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Background: There is very little information available on a national level as to the number of people exposed to specific asthmagens in workplaces. Methods: We conducted a national telephone survey in Australia to investigate the prevalence of current occupational exposure to 277 asthmagens, assembled into 27 groups. Demographic and current job information were obtained. A web-based tool, OccIDEAS, was used to collect job task information and assign exposure to each asthmagen group. Results: In the Australian Workplace Exposure Study – Asthma (AWES- Asthma) we interviewed 4878 participants (2441 male and 2437 female). Exposure to at least one asthmagen was more common among men (47 %) than women (40 %). Extrapolated to the Australian population, approximately 2.8 million men and 1.7 million women were estimated to be exposed. Among men, the most common exposures were bioaerosols (29 %) and metals (27 %), whilst the most common exposures among women were latex (25 %) and industrial cleaning and sterilising agents (20 %). Conclusions: This study provides information about the prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in Australian workplaces which will be useful in setting priorities for control and prevention of occupational asthma. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:02:29Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-13175 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T07:02:29Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | BioMed Central Ltd |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-131752017-11-08T01:56:34Z The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce Fritschi, Lin Crewe, Julie Darcey, Ellie Reid, Alison Glass, D. Benke, G. Driscoll, T. Peters, S. Si, Si Abramson, M. Carey, Renee Background: There is very little information available on a national level as to the number of people exposed to specific asthmagens in workplaces. Methods: We conducted a national telephone survey in Australia to investigate the prevalence of current occupational exposure to 277 asthmagens, assembled into 27 groups. Demographic and current job information were obtained. A web-based tool, OccIDEAS, was used to collect job task information and assign exposure to each asthmagen group. Results: In the Australian Workplace Exposure Study – Asthma (AWES- Asthma) we interviewed 4878 participants (2441 male and 2437 female). Exposure to at least one asthmagen was more common among men (47 %) than women (40 %). Extrapolated to the Australian population, approximately 2.8 million men and 1.7 million women were estimated to be exposed. Among men, the most common exposures were bioaerosols (29 %) and metals (27 %), whilst the most common exposures among women were latex (25 %) and industrial cleaning and sterilising agents (20 %). Conclusions: This study provides information about the prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in Australian workplaces which will be useful in setting priorities for control and prevention of occupational asthma. 2016 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/13175 10.1186/s12890-016-0212-6 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ BioMed Central Ltd fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Fritschi, Lin Crewe, Julie Darcey, Ellie Reid, Alison Glass, D. Benke, G. Driscoll, T. Peters, S. Si, Si Abramson, M. Carey, Renee The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce |
| title | The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce |
| title_full | The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce |
| title_fullStr | The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce |
| title_full_unstemmed | The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce |
| title_short | The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce |
| title_sort | estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the australian workforce |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/13175 |