The validity of psychiatric diagnoses: The case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders

We tested whether developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and mixed receptive expressive language disorder (RELD) are valid diagnoses by assessing whether they are separated from each other, from other childhood disorders, and from normality by natural boundaries termed zones of rarity. Standardiz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dyck, M., Piek, Jan, Patrick, J.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Pergamon 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12939
_version_ 1848748215329882112
author Dyck, M.
Piek, Jan
Patrick, J.
author_facet Dyck, M.
Piek, Jan
Patrick, J.
author_sort Dyck, M.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description We tested whether developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and mixed receptive expressive language disorder (RELD) are valid diagnoses by assessing whether they are separated from each other, from other childhood disorders, and from normality by natural boundaries termed zones of rarity. Standardized measures of intelligence, language, motor skills, social cognition, and executive functioning were administered to children with DCD (n = 22), RELD (n = 30), autistic disorder (n = 30), mental retardation (n = 24), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 53) and to a representative sample of children (n = 449). Discriminant function scores were used to test whether there were zones of rarity between the DCD, RELD, and other groups. DCD and RELD were reliably distinguishable only from the mental retardation group. Cluster and latent class analyses both resulted in only two clusters or classes being identified, one consisting mainly of typical children and the other of children with a disorder. Fifty percent of children in the DCD group and 20% in the RELD group were clustered with typical children. There was no evidence of zones of rarity between disorders. Rather, with the exception of mental retardation, the results imply there are no natural boundaries between disorders or between disorders and normality.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:01:30Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-12939
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:01:30Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Pergamon
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-129392017-09-13T16:02:38Z The validity of psychiatric diagnoses: The case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders Dyck, M. Piek, Jan Patrick, J. We tested whether developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and mixed receptive expressive language disorder (RELD) are valid diagnoses by assessing whether they are separated from each other, from other childhood disorders, and from normality by natural boundaries termed zones of rarity. Standardized measures of intelligence, language, motor skills, social cognition, and executive functioning were administered to children with DCD (n = 22), RELD (n = 30), autistic disorder (n = 30), mental retardation (n = 24), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 53) and to a representative sample of children (n = 449). Discriminant function scores were used to test whether there were zones of rarity between the DCD, RELD, and other groups. DCD and RELD were reliably distinguishable only from the mental retardation group. Cluster and latent class analyses both resulted in only two clusters or classes being identified, one consisting mainly of typical children and the other of children with a disorder. Fifty percent of children in the DCD group and 20% in the RELD group were clustered with typical children. There was no evidence of zones of rarity between disorders. Rather, with the exception of mental retardation, the results imply there are no natural boundaries between disorders or between disorders and normality. 2011 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12939 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.001 Pergamon restricted
spellingShingle Dyck, M.
Piek, Jan
Patrick, J.
The validity of psychiatric diagnoses: The case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders
title The validity of psychiatric diagnoses: The case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders
title_full The validity of psychiatric diagnoses: The case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders
title_fullStr The validity of psychiatric diagnoses: The case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders
title_full_unstemmed The validity of psychiatric diagnoses: The case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders
title_short The validity of psychiatric diagnoses: The case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders
title_sort validity of psychiatric diagnoses: the case of ‘specific’ developmental disorders
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12939