Dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: Process analysis and pilot test

Via isolating the fuel pyrolysis and char gasification, the so-called dual bed pyrolysis gasification (DBPG) was proposed to realize the co-production of pyrolysis products and gasification gas. The process simulation with Aspen Plus shows that the DBPG process can run autothermally using air as the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Cai, L., Yao, C., Gao, S., Li, Chun-Zhu, Xu, G.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12734
_version_ 1848748159413518336
author Zhang, Y.
Wang, Y.
Cai, L.
Yao, C.
Gao, S.
Li, Chun-Zhu
Xu, G.
author_facet Zhang, Y.
Wang, Y.
Cai, L.
Yao, C.
Gao, S.
Li, Chun-Zhu
Xu, G.
author_sort Zhang, Y.
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Via isolating the fuel pyrolysis and char gasification, the so-called dual bed pyrolysis gasification (DBPG) was proposed to realize the co-production of pyrolysis products and gasification gas. The process simulation with Aspen Plus shows that the DBPG process can run autothermally using air as the gasification reagent, but the complete conversion of char in the gasifier requires relatively high O/C ratio due to the absence of steam in the reactor. This would make the higher heating value (HHV) of the produced gasification gas below 1000 kcal/Nm3. Adding steam to the char gasifier can realize full char conversion at lower O/C ratio to improve the gasification gas quality. The effect of air preheating on the gasification performance was further analyzed to optimize the operating conditions of DBPG. A pilot scale plant (100 kg-coal/h) of DBPG was established and tested by using air as the gasification reagent plant to verify the technology feasibility. At the steady operating temperatures of 600 °C for pyrolyzer and 850 °C for gasifier, the produced pyrolysis gas was rich in hydrocarbons and the tar yield reached 8.4 wt% and was rich in phenols and its derivatives, but the HHV of the gasification gas was only 510 kcal/Nm3, much lower than the simulated value. A laboratory test on char–air gasification in a fluidized bed reactor further showed that the short residence time of char inside the gasifier and thus the low carbon conversion and the burning of the produced gas in the reactor was the cause for this lower heating value of the gasification gas.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:00:37Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-12734
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:00:37Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier Ltd
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-127342017-09-13T15:00:25Z Dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: Process analysis and pilot test Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Cai, L. Yao, C. Gao, S. Li, Chun-Zhu Xu, G. Decoupled conversion Pyrolysis gasification Coal Dual bed Cogeneration Via isolating the fuel pyrolysis and char gasification, the so-called dual bed pyrolysis gasification (DBPG) was proposed to realize the co-production of pyrolysis products and gasification gas. The process simulation with Aspen Plus shows that the DBPG process can run autothermally using air as the gasification reagent, but the complete conversion of char in the gasifier requires relatively high O/C ratio due to the absence of steam in the reactor. This would make the higher heating value (HHV) of the produced gasification gas below 1000 kcal/Nm3. Adding steam to the char gasifier can realize full char conversion at lower O/C ratio to improve the gasification gas quality. The effect of air preheating on the gasification performance was further analyzed to optimize the operating conditions of DBPG. A pilot scale plant (100 kg-coal/h) of DBPG was established and tested by using air as the gasification reagent plant to verify the technology feasibility. At the steady operating temperatures of 600 °C for pyrolyzer and 850 °C for gasifier, the produced pyrolysis gas was rich in hydrocarbons and the tar yield reached 8.4 wt% and was rich in phenols and its derivatives, but the HHV of the gasification gas was only 510 kcal/Nm3, much lower than the simulated value. A laboratory test on char–air gasification in a fluidized bed reactor further showed that the short residence time of char inside the gasifier and thus the low carbon conversion and the burning of the produced gas in the reactor was the cause for this lower heating value of the gasification gas. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12734 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.038 Elsevier Ltd restricted
spellingShingle Decoupled conversion
Pyrolysis gasification
Coal
Dual bed
Cogeneration
Zhang, Y.
Wang, Y.
Cai, L.
Yao, C.
Gao, S.
Li, Chun-Zhu
Xu, G.
Dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: Process analysis and pilot test
title Dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: Process analysis and pilot test
title_full Dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: Process analysis and pilot test
title_fullStr Dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: Process analysis and pilot test
title_full_unstemmed Dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: Process analysis and pilot test
title_short Dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: Process analysis and pilot test
title_sort dual bed pyrolysis gasification of coal: process analysis and pilot test
topic Decoupled conversion
Pyrolysis gasification
Coal
Dual bed
Cogeneration
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12734