Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour

This study extends previous research by empirically investigating the relationship of audit quality and governance monitoring mechanisms with the probability of receiving a qualified audit report. Using Australian manufacturing company data we find that Big 4 auditors are more likely to issue a clea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rusmin, Rusmin, Tower, Greg, Brown, Alistair, Van der Zahn, J-L.
Format: Journal Article
Published: Curtin Business School 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12617
_version_ 1848748124808413184
author Rusmin, Rusmin
Tower, Greg
Brown, Alistair
Van der Zahn, J-L.
author_facet Rusmin, Rusmin
Tower, Greg
Brown, Alistair
Van der Zahn, J-L.
author_sort Rusmin, Rusmin
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description This study extends previous research by empirically investigating the relationship of audit quality and governance monitoring mechanisms with the probability of receiving a qualified audit report. Using Australian manufacturing company data we find that Big 4 auditors are more likely to issue a clean audit report. We also note that auditors are less likely to qualify a certain firm’s financial statements when higher levels of non-audit fees are derived. Finally, this study adds to the growing body of literature that documents the importance of boards’ role in monitoring management behavior; that is, we find that smaller size boards appear to be less effective than larger size boards. The above findings have implications about the perception of auditor independence and effectiveness of board of directors.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T07:00:04Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-12617
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T07:00:04Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Curtin Business School
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-126172017-01-30T11:31:43Z Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour Rusmin, Rusmin Tower, Greg Brown, Alistair Van der Zahn, J-L. Audit reporting behaviour monitoring mechanisms This study extends previous research by empirically investigating the relationship of audit quality and governance monitoring mechanisms with the probability of receiving a qualified audit report. Using Australian manufacturing company data we find that Big 4 auditors are more likely to issue a clean audit report. We also note that auditors are less likely to qualify a certain firm’s financial statements when higher levels of non-audit fees are derived. Finally, this study adds to the growing body of literature that documents the importance of boards’ role in monitoring management behavior; that is, we find that smaller size boards appear to be less effective than larger size boards. The above findings have implications about the perception of auditor independence and effectiveness of board of directors. 2009 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12617 Curtin Business School fulltext
spellingShingle Audit
reporting behaviour
monitoring mechanisms
Rusmin, Rusmin
Tower, Greg
Brown, Alistair
Van der Zahn, J-L.
Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour
title Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour
title_full Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour
title_fullStr Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour
title_short Audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour
title_sort audit quality, monitoring mechanisms and auditor reporting behaviour
topic Audit
reporting behaviour
monitoring mechanisms
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12617