A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia

QR Code

A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia

Introduction Medical decision-making in oncology is a complicated process and to date there are few studies examining how patients with cancer make choices with respect to different features of their care. It is also unknown whether patient choices vary by geographical location and how location coul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Wong, S.F., Norman, Richard, Dunning, T., Ashley, D., Lorgelly, P.
Format:	Journal Article
Published:	BM J Group 2014
Online Access:	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12535

Similar Items

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) to examine the preferences of patients with cancer and their willingness to pay for different types of health care appointments
by: Wong, S., et al.
Published: (2016)

What influences healthcare professionals' treatment preferences for older women with operable breast cancer?: an application of the discrete choice experiment
by: Morgan, J.L., et al.
Published: (2017)

Acceptability and utility of, and preference for wearable activity trackers amongst non-metropolitan cancer survivors
by: Hardcastle, Sarah, et al.
Published: (2018)

A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for EQ-5D-5L Health States
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2013)

Is dimension order important when valuing health states using Discrete Choice Experiments including duration?
by: Mulhern, B., et al.
Published: (2017)

How do school resources and academic performance differ across Australia’s rural, regional and metropolitan communities?
by: Sullivan, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2013)

Measuring the Loss of Consumer Choice in Mandatory Health Programmes Using Discrete Choice Experiments
by: Parkinson, B., et al.
Published: (2013)

Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2018)

Preferences for Cancer Treatments: an Overview of Methods and Applications in Oncology
by: Blinman, P., et al.
Published: (2012)

One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation
by: Mulhern, B., et al.
Published: (2018)

Ageing in Place in Rural Areas of Western Australia: Actions, Choices and Preferences
by: Boldy, Duncan, et al.
Published: (2013)

Viewers’ choice: discrete choice elements of viewer’s in portal television usage and preferred types of programs watched frequency in achieving gratifications
by: Hashim, Norliana, et al.
Published: (2021)

An Australian Discrete Choice Experiment to Value EQ-5D Health States
by: Viney, R., et al.
Published: (2014)

Aquaculturists preference heterogeneity towards wetland ecosystem services : a latent class discrete choice model
by: Roseliza Mat Alipiah,, et al.
Published: (2018)

Estimating health state utility values from discrete choice experiments—A QALY space model approach
by: Gu, Y., et al.
Published: (2014)

Women with breast cancer: preferences for surveillance
by: Jiwa, Moyez
Published: (2011)

Learning and Fatigue Effects Revisited: The Impact of Accounting for Unobservable Preference and Scale Heterogeneity on Perceived Ordering Effects in Multiple Choice Task Discrete Choice Experiments
by: Greene, William, et al.
Published: (2012)

Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2014)

COMMUNITY PREFERENCES FOR WATER USE AND SUPPLY OPTIONS Metropolitan Survey Report
by: Dzidic, Peta, et al.
Published: (2014)

The Improving Rural Cancer Outcomes (IRCO) Trial: A factorial clusterrandomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to reduce time to diagnosis in rural patients with cancer in Western Australia: A study protocol
by: Emery, J., et al.
Published: (2014)

Models for Discrete/Ordered Outcomes and Choice Models
by: Greene, William
Published: (2014)

Testing for structural breaks in discrete choice models
by: Wongsosaputro, J., et al.
Published: (2011)

The status quo in discrete choice experiments: is it relevant?
by: W Mohamad, Wan Norhidayah, et al.
Published: (2019)

Test-Retest Reliability of Discrete Choice Experiment for Valuations of QLU-C10D Health States
by: Gamper, E., et al.
Published: (2018)

Exploring network structure and the role of key stakeholders to understand the obesity prevention system in an Australian metropolitan health service: Study protocol
by: Jancey, Jonine, et al.
Published: (2019)

Order of presentation of dimensions did not systematically bias utility weights from a discrete choice experiment
by: Norman, Richard, et al.
Published: (2016)

Women with breast cancers’ preferences for surveillance follow-up
by: Jiwa, Moyez, et al.
Published: (2011)

An information theoretic estimator for the mixed discrete choice model
by: Golan, A., et al.
Published: (2016)

Individual decision making: preference and choice
by: Ariffin, Muhammad Irwan
Published: (2016)

Optimal choice of electoral preference data
by: van der Eijk, Cees, et al.
Published: (2008)

Russian varsities a preferred choice
Published: (2009)

COMMUNITY PREFERENCES FOR WATER USE AND SUPPLY OPTIONS Metropolitan Survey Extended Summary Report
by: Dzidic, Peta, et al.
Published: (2014)

Developing a sustainable model of rural cancer care: The Western Australian Cancer Network project
by: McConigley, Ruth, et al.
Published: (2011)

Breaking bad news of cancer diagnosis – Perception of the cancer patients in a rural community in Malaysia
by: Bain, Mathew Gabriel, et al.
Published: (2014)

Using choice experiments to understand visitors preferences for the man-made lake ecotourism services in Terengganu, Malaysia
by: Wan Muhamad, Wan Nur Hidayah, et al.
Published: (2014)

Memorandum of Understanding between Universiti Malaysia Sarawak and Manchester Metropolitan University
by: Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
Published: (2009)

Which patients are assessed by lung cancer nurse specialists? A national lung cancer audit study of over 128,000 patients across England
by: Khakwani, Aamir, et al.
Published: (2016)

Understanding of anti-cancer properties of neolamarckia cadamba leaves extract on breast cancer cell
by: Razali, Shakirah, et al.
Published: (2017)

Essays on social preferences and choices in social dilemmas
by: Lee, Kyeongtae
Published: (2020)

Graduates of UMP, the preferred choice of the job market
by: UMP, PNC
Published: (2019)