Copyright and Innovative Technologies
This article examines how the Australian legal system manages copyright issues related to the development of innovative technologies, focusing in particular on how the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (CA) enforces the effect of ‘technological protection measures’ and ‘access control protection measures’ by...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
School of Business Law, Curtin Business School, Curtin University of Technology
2008
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12466 |
| _version_ | 1848748084298776576 |
|---|---|
| author | Sadler, Pauline Sadler, Peter |
| author_facet | Sadler, Pauline Sadler, Peter |
| author_sort | Sadler, Pauline |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | This article examines how the Australian legal system manages copyright issues related to the development of innovative technologies, focusing in particular on how the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (CA) enforces the effect of ‘technological protection measures’ and ‘access control protection measures’ by proscribing the use of ‘circumvention devices’. Cases referred to are Autodesk v Dyason [1992] HCA 2 and Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment & Ors [2005] HCA 58. Legislation discussed is the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (Cth), Copyright Amendment Act 2006 (Cth). Reference is also made to the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T06:59:25Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-12466 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T06:59:25Z |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publisher | School of Business Law, Curtin Business School, Curtin University of Technology |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-124662017-01-30T11:30:56Z Copyright and Innovative Technologies Sadler, Pauline Sadler, Peter This article examines how the Australian legal system manages copyright issues related to the development of innovative technologies, focusing in particular on how the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (CA) enforces the effect of ‘technological protection measures’ and ‘access control protection measures’ by proscribing the use of ‘circumvention devices’. Cases referred to are Autodesk v Dyason [1992] HCA 2 and Stevens v Kabushiki Kaisha Sony Computer Entertainment & Ors [2005] HCA 58. Legislation discussed is the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (Cth), Copyright Amendment Act 2006 (Cth). Reference is also made to the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. 2008 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12466 School of Business Law, Curtin Business School, Curtin University of Technology fulltext |
| spellingShingle | Sadler, Pauline Sadler, Peter Copyright and Innovative Technologies |
| title | Copyright and Innovative Technologies |
| title_full | Copyright and Innovative Technologies |
| title_fullStr | Copyright and Innovative Technologies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Copyright and Innovative Technologies |
| title_short | Copyright and Innovative Technologies |
| title_sort | copyright and innovative technologies |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12466 |