Parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two Australian children's hospitals

Aim: This paper is a report of the comparison of perceptions of family-centred care by hospital staff (nurses, doctors and allied health staff) and parents of hospitalised children in 2 Australian tertiary paediatric hospitals.Background: Family-centred care is an accepted approach to caring for chi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gill, Fenella, Pascoe, E, Monterosso, L, Young, J, Burr, C, Tanner, A, Shields, L
Format: Journal Article
Published: Unknown 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ubplj.org/index.php/ejpch/article/view/665
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12336
_version_ 1848748048220422144
author Gill, Fenella
Pascoe, E
Monterosso, L
Young, J
Burr, C
Tanner, A
Shields, L
author_facet Gill, Fenella
Pascoe, E
Monterosso, L
Young, J
Burr, C
Tanner, A
Shields, L
author_sort Gill, Fenella
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description Aim: This paper is a report of the comparison of perceptions of family-centred care by hospital staff (nurses, doctors and allied health staff) and parents of hospitalised children in 2 Australian tertiary paediatric hospitals.Background: Family-centred care is an accepted approach to caring for children and their families in hospital. Previous publications have been inconsistent, ranging from promoting its benefits and integration into practice, reporting operational difficulties and proposing that family-centred care may not be working at all. An evaluation of the model of care is long overdue.Method: A quantitative comparative cross-sectional survey was used to collect data in 2010 from a convenience sample of 309 parents of hospitalised children and 519 staff. Participants rated 20 items grouped into 3 subscales of respect, collaboration and support.Findings: Both parents and staff responses were positive and parents had significantly higher subscale scores for respect, collaboration and support (all p<0.0001). Parents’ responses for 19 of the 20 items were significantly higher than for staff. The item on which parents and staff did not differ was concerned with being able to question recommendations about the child’s treatment.Conclusion: Both parents and staff had positive perceptions of their family-centred care experiences. Parents’ perception of their experience was more positive than staff perceptions of their delivery of family-centred care in hospital. Whilst the positive experience by both consumers and healthcare providers is an important finding, reasons for differences, in particular in supporting parents, require further examination.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:58:51Z
format Journal Article
id curtin-20.500.11937-12336
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:58:51Z
publishDate 2013
publisher Unknown
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-123362017-01-30T11:30:01Z Parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two Australian children's hospitals Gill, Fenella Pascoe, E Monterosso, L Young, J Burr, C Tanner, A Shields, L nurses parents perceptions doctors person-centeredness family-centred care hospital Allied health staff Aim: This paper is a report of the comparison of perceptions of family-centred care by hospital staff (nurses, doctors and allied health staff) and parents of hospitalised children in 2 Australian tertiary paediatric hospitals.Background: Family-centred care is an accepted approach to caring for children and their families in hospital. Previous publications have been inconsistent, ranging from promoting its benefits and integration into practice, reporting operational difficulties and proposing that family-centred care may not be working at all. An evaluation of the model of care is long overdue.Method: A quantitative comparative cross-sectional survey was used to collect data in 2010 from a convenience sample of 309 parents of hospitalised children and 519 staff. Participants rated 20 items grouped into 3 subscales of respect, collaboration and support.Findings: Both parents and staff responses were positive and parents had significantly higher subscale scores for respect, collaboration and support (all p<0.0001). Parents’ responses for 19 of the 20 items were significantly higher than for staff. The item on which parents and staff did not differ was concerned with being able to question recommendations about the child’s treatment.Conclusion: Both parents and staff had positive perceptions of their family-centred care experiences. Parents’ perception of their experience was more positive than staff perceptions of their delivery of family-centred care in hospital. Whilst the positive experience by both consumers and healthcare providers is an important finding, reasons for differences, in particular in supporting parents, require further examination. 2013 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12336 http://ubplj.org/index.php/ejpch/article/view/665 Unknown restricted
spellingShingle nurses
parents
perceptions
doctors
person-centeredness
family-centred care
hospital
Allied health staff
Gill, Fenella
Pascoe, E
Monterosso, L
Young, J
Burr, C
Tanner, A
Shields, L
Parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two Australian children's hospitals
title Parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two Australian children's hospitals
title_full Parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two Australian children's hospitals
title_fullStr Parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two Australian children's hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two Australian children's hospitals
title_short Parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two Australian children's hospitals
title_sort parent and staff perceptions of family-centred care in two australian children's hospitals
topic nurses
parents
perceptions
doctors
person-centeredness
family-centred care
hospital
Allied health staff
url http://ubplj.org/index.php/ejpch/article/view/665
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/12336