Writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs

In 2009 when Julie Myerson published her creative non-fiction book The Lost Child., Minette Marrin wrote in the Times: 'Her son was betrayed because she's a writer first and a mother second.’ This was clearly meant as a damning indictment of Myerson, as was much of the press coverage of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robertson, Rachel
Other Authors: Janie Conway-Herron
Format: Conference Paper
Published: Australasian Association of Writing Programs 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/11034
_version_ 1848747697141448704
author Robertson, Rachel
author2 Janie Conway-Herron
author_facet Janie Conway-Herron
Robertson, Rachel
author_sort Robertson, Rachel
building Curtin Institutional Repository
collection Online Access
description In 2009 when Julie Myerson published her creative non-fiction book The Lost Child., Minette Marrin wrote in the Times: 'Her son was betrayed because she's a writer first and a mother second.’ This was clearly meant as a damning indictment of Myerson, as was much of the press coverage of the book's representation of Myerson's teenage son and his drug habit. I compare this response to the positive reviews received by George and Sam by Charlotte Moore. Like Myerson, Rachel Cusk received a negative press when she published her 2001 motherhood memoir, A Life’s Work, with reviewers accusing her of irresponsibility, selfishness, and lack of love for her children. The public discourse used about these motherhood memoirs raises significant political and ethical issues around mothers writing autobiographically about their children. As the mother of a child with a disability who is also a memoirist, I explore how mothers writing about their children must navigate challenges to do with the construction of motherhood, the public/private split, and the archetypal splitting of mothers into good and bad. At the same time that writers such as Cusk and Myerson are condemned for exploiting their children, there has been a growth in published motherhood memoirs, including those about children with disabilities, and the so-called 'mommy blogs'. Many of these receive positive reviews and avoid the kind of public controversy caused by Cusk and Myerson. I suggest that the reason for the negative responses to Myerson and Cusk may relate more to the seriousness with which they discuss loss and motherhood, rather than the ethical issues of writing about their children. It is this seriousness and the ability to give voice to otherwise unarticulated aspects of motherhood that is of value in the work of Cusk, Moore and Myerson.
first_indexed 2025-11-14T06:53:16Z
format Conference Paper
id curtin-20.500.11937-11034
institution Curtin University Malaysia
institution_category Local University
last_indexed 2025-11-14T06:53:16Z
publishDate 2012
publisher Australasian Association of Writing Programs
recordtype eprints
repository_type Digital Repository
spelling curtin-20.500.11937-110342023-02-02T07:57:37Z Writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs Robertson, Rachel Janie Conway-Herron Moya Costello Lynda Hawryluk Memoir Life writing Autobiography Ethics Motherhood In 2009 when Julie Myerson published her creative non-fiction book The Lost Child., Minette Marrin wrote in the Times: 'Her son was betrayed because she's a writer first and a mother second.’ This was clearly meant as a damning indictment of Myerson, as was much of the press coverage of the book's representation of Myerson's teenage son and his drug habit. I compare this response to the positive reviews received by George and Sam by Charlotte Moore. Like Myerson, Rachel Cusk received a negative press when she published her 2001 motherhood memoir, A Life’s Work, with reviewers accusing her of irresponsibility, selfishness, and lack of love for her children. The public discourse used about these motherhood memoirs raises significant political and ethical issues around mothers writing autobiographically about their children. As the mother of a child with a disability who is also a memoirist, I explore how mothers writing about their children must navigate challenges to do with the construction of motherhood, the public/private split, and the archetypal splitting of mothers into good and bad. At the same time that writers such as Cusk and Myerson are condemned for exploiting their children, there has been a growth in published motherhood memoirs, including those about children with disabilities, and the so-called 'mommy blogs'. Many of these receive positive reviews and avoid the kind of public controversy caused by Cusk and Myerson. I suggest that the reason for the negative responses to Myerson and Cusk may relate more to the seriousness with which they discuss loss and motherhood, rather than the ethical issues of writing about their children. It is this seriousness and the ability to give voice to otherwise unarticulated aspects of motherhood that is of value in the work of Cusk, Moore and Myerson. 2012 Conference Paper http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/11034 Australasian Association of Writing Programs restricted
spellingShingle Memoir
Life writing
Autobiography
Ethics
Motherhood
Robertson, Rachel
Writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs
title Writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs
title_full Writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs
title_fullStr Writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs
title_full_unstemmed Writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs
title_short Writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs
title_sort writer first, mother second: the politics and ethics of motherhood memoirs
topic Memoir
Life writing
Autobiography
Ethics
Motherhood
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/11034