Linking Event Thinking with Structural Thinking: Methods to Improve Client Value in Projects
Using a participant–observer research design, a team of modelers designed and implemented modeling guidelines to link semantically rich scenario maps to a formal causal influence diagram of a running simulation model. This process serves to link event thinking to structural thinking. These guideline...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2006
|
| Online Access: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sdr.332/abstract http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10957 |
| _version_ | 1848747676425781248 |
|---|---|
| author | Howick, S. Ackermann, Fran Anderson, D. |
| author_facet | Howick, S. Ackermann, Fran Anderson, D. |
| author_sort | Howick, S. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Using a participant–observer research design, a team of modelers designed and implemented modeling guidelines to link semantically rich scenario maps to a formal causal influence diagram of a running simulation model. This process serves to link event thinking to structural thinking. These guidelines were used in a case, which involved: (1) developing a cause model of scenarios of the promotion of renewable energy sources in the U.K. electric power market from material elicited from a client group; (2) creating a system dynamics model of the same area; and (3) an integration of products 1 and 2 which enabled an analysis of the scenarios using the simulation model. The first two products used standard approaches and are not new; however, the third represents the key output of the research. By linking products 1 and 2, the research aimed to create better client value in the project by combining, in a systematic way, the relevant elements of scenario maps and system dynamics models. The process allows client groups to visualize and comprehend the linkage between event thinking and structural thinking in a complex system. This work informs ongoing research in group model building, strategy modeling (especially using scenarios) and the ongoing debate about qualitative versus quantitative system dynamics. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T06:52:56Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-10957 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T06:52:56Z |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-109572019-02-19T04:26:46Z Linking Event Thinking with Structural Thinking: Methods to Improve Client Value in Projects Howick, S. Ackermann, Fran Anderson, D. Using a participant–observer research design, a team of modelers designed and implemented modeling guidelines to link semantically rich scenario maps to a formal causal influence diagram of a running simulation model. This process serves to link event thinking to structural thinking. These guidelines were used in a case, which involved: (1) developing a cause model of scenarios of the promotion of renewable energy sources in the U.K. electric power market from material elicited from a client group; (2) creating a system dynamics model of the same area; and (3) an integration of products 1 and 2 which enabled an analysis of the scenarios using the simulation model. The first two products used standard approaches and are not new; however, the third represents the key output of the research. By linking products 1 and 2, the research aimed to create better client value in the project by combining, in a systematic way, the relevant elements of scenario maps and system dynamics models. The process allows client groups to visualize and comprehend the linkage between event thinking and structural thinking in a complex system. This work informs ongoing research in group model building, strategy modeling (especially using scenarios) and the ongoing debate about qualitative versus quantitative system dynamics. 2006 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10957 10.1002/sdr.332 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sdr.332/abstract John Wiley & Sons Ltd restricted |
| spellingShingle | Howick, S. Ackermann, Fran Anderson, D. Linking Event Thinking with Structural Thinking: Methods to Improve Client Value in Projects |
| title | Linking Event Thinking with Structural Thinking: Methods to Improve Client Value in Projects |
| title_full | Linking Event Thinking with Structural Thinking: Methods to Improve Client Value in Projects |
| title_fullStr | Linking Event Thinking with Structural Thinking: Methods to Improve Client Value in Projects |
| title_full_unstemmed | Linking Event Thinking with Structural Thinking: Methods to Improve Client Value in Projects |
| title_short | Linking Event Thinking with Structural Thinking: Methods to Improve Client Value in Projects |
| title_sort | linking event thinking with structural thinking: methods to improve client value in projects |
| url | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sdr.332/abstract http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10957 |