Responsiveness of Clinical and Laboratory Measures to Intervention Effects in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder
Purpose: To compare responsiveness of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and segment kinematics and center of pressure measures in detecting intervention effects in children with developmental coordination disorder. Methods: Motion Analysis Laboratory (MAL) data from 21 children...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Published: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/533526 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10286 |
| _version_ | 1848746190256996352 |
|---|---|
| author | Larke, D. Campbell, Amity Jensen, Lynn Straker, Leon |
| author_facet | Larke, D. Campbell, Amity Jensen, Lynn Straker, Leon |
| author_sort | Larke, D. |
| building | Curtin Institutional Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| description | Purpose: To compare responsiveness of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and segment kinematics and center of pressure measures in detecting intervention effects in children with developmental coordination disorder. Methods: Motion Analysis Laboratory (MAL) data from 21 children with developmental coordination disorder (mean age 11.0 years) in a randomized control trial were analyzed using effect size, minimal detectable difference, and parent and child report of meaningfulness (X2 tests). Results: The MABC-2 and MAL data showed moderate-large effect sizes (0.7-1.8). The MABC-2 detected large portions of children whose change exceeded the minimal detectable difference (47.6%-71.4%); MAL data detected small portions (0%-19.0%). Neither tool correlated well with meaningfulness (X2 = 0.186-5.724; P > .10). Both tools detected change in the overall group; however, only the MABC-2 detected individual change exceeding potential measurement error. Conclusions: Although both assessment tools are responsive, they may be responsive to different types of change. Therefore, assessment constructs should be matched to intervention goals. |
| first_indexed | 2025-11-14T06:29:19Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | curtin-20.500.11937-10286 |
| institution | Curtin University Malaysia |
| institution_category | Local University |
| last_indexed | 2025-11-14T06:29:19Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. |
| recordtype | eprints |
| repository_type | Digital Repository |
| spelling | curtin-20.500.11937-102862017-09-13T14:52:05Z Responsiveness of Clinical and Laboratory Measures to Intervention Effects in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder Larke, D. Campbell, Amity Jensen, Lynn Straker, Leon child biomechanics developmental coordination disorder motor skills evaluation methodologies Purpose: To compare responsiveness of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2) and segment kinematics and center of pressure measures in detecting intervention effects in children with developmental coordination disorder. Methods: Motion Analysis Laboratory (MAL) data from 21 children with developmental coordination disorder (mean age 11.0 years) in a randomized control trial were analyzed using effect size, minimal detectable difference, and parent and child report of meaningfulness (X2 tests). Results: The MABC-2 and MAL data showed moderate-large effect sizes (0.7-1.8). The MABC-2 detected large portions of children whose change exceeded the minimal detectable difference (47.6%-71.4%); MAL data detected small portions (0%-19.0%). Neither tool correlated well with meaningfulness (X2 = 0.186-5.724; P > .10). Both tools detected change in the overall group; however, only the MABC-2 detected individual change exceeding potential measurement error. Conclusions: Although both assessment tools are responsive, they may be responsive to different types of change. Therefore, assessment constructs should be matched to intervention goals. 2015 Journal Article http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10286 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000102 http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/533526 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. unknown |
| spellingShingle | child biomechanics developmental coordination disorder motor skills evaluation methodologies Larke, D. Campbell, Amity Jensen, Lynn Straker, Leon Responsiveness of Clinical and Laboratory Measures to Intervention Effects in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder |
| title | Responsiveness of Clinical and Laboratory Measures to Intervention Effects in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder |
| title_full | Responsiveness of Clinical and Laboratory Measures to Intervention Effects in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder |
| title_fullStr | Responsiveness of Clinical and Laboratory Measures to Intervention Effects in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder |
| title_full_unstemmed | Responsiveness of Clinical and Laboratory Measures to Intervention Effects in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder |
| title_short | Responsiveness of Clinical and Laboratory Measures to Intervention Effects in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder |
| title_sort | responsiveness of clinical and laboratory measures to intervention effects in children with developmental coordination disorder |
| topic | child biomechanics developmental coordination disorder motor skills evaluation methodologies |
| url | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/533526 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/10286 |