The Reconciliation Approach in Resolving Contradictory Prophetic Tradition

Bibliographic Details
Format: Restricted Document
_version_ 1860799830517874688
building INTELEK Repository
collection Online Access
collectionurl https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
date 2011-01-22 21:49:13
format Restricted Document
id 7565
institution UniSZA
internalnotes Al-Khatib al-Baghdadiy (1986), al-Kifayah fi ‘Ilm al-Riwayah. C.2, Bayrut: Dar al-Kitab al-‘Arabi. ___________________ (1400H), Al-Faqih wa al-Mutafaqqih wa Usul al-Fiqh. C.2, Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al- ‘Ilmiyyah, j.2, h.222. Abu ‘Amr Ibn al-Salah (1986), Ulum al-Hadith.Bayrut: Dar al-Fikt al-Mu’asir. Al-Amir al-Sana‘aniy (t.t.), Taudih al-Afkar li Ma‘ani Tanqih al-Anzar, Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr. ‘Abd al-Hayy al-Laknawiy (1994) Al-Ajwibah al-Fadilah li al-As’ilah al-‘Asyrah al-Kamilah. C. 3, Halab: Maktabah al-Matbu‘at al-Islamiyyah. Al-Imam al-Nawawiy (1987), Syarh Sahih Muslim. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr. Al-Imam Al-Bukhariy (1987), Sahih al-Bukhari, Kaherah: Dar al-Rayyan. Al-Imam Ibn Majah (t.t.), al-Sunan. Bayrut: al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah. Al-Imam Muslim (1987), Sahih Muslim., Kaherah: Dar al-Rayyan li al-Turath. Al-Imam Abu Dawud (1994), al-Sunan.Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr. Al-Imam al-Tirmidhiy (1994), al-Sunan. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr Al-Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (1313H) Al-Musnad., Kaherah: Dar al-ma’arif. Al-Imam al-Hakim (1990), al-Mustadrak ‘ala al-Sahihayn. Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. Al-Imam al-Syatibiy, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim ibn Musa (1402H), al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Ahkam. C. 6, Kaherah: Dar al-Fikr al-‘Arabi. al-Humaidiy, Abu Bakr ‘Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr (t.t), al-Musnad. Madinah: al-Maktabah al-Salafiyyah. Dr ‘Abd al-Majid al-Susuah (1997), Manhaj al-Tawfiq wa al-Tarjih Bayn Mukhtalif al-Hadith. Amman: Dar al-Nafa’is. Muhammad ibn Idris al-Syafi‘iy (1358H), al-Risalah. Kaherah: al-Babi al-Halabiy. _______________ (1985), Ikhtilaf al-Hadith. Bayrut: Muassasah al-Kutub al-Thaqafiyyah. Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalaniy (t.t.) Nuzhah al-Nazar fi Syarh Nukhbah al-Fikar. Madinah: Maktabah Tayyibah. ______________ (1987), Fath al-Bari bi Syarh al-Bukhariy. Kaherah: Dar al-Rayyan. Salih ibn Ahmad Rida (2001), al- I‘jaz al-‘Ilmiy fi al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah. Riyad: Maktabah al-‘Abikan, Taj al-Din, ‘Abd al-Wahhab ibn ‘Aliy al-Subkiy (1404H), Al-Ibhaj fi Syarh al-Minhaj. Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. Majalah Wanita, Desember 1996. Utusan Malaysia, ruangan kesihatan 02 April, 2005. www.moh.gov.my/bpk/kempen_kk/kempen_92.htm
originalfilename 3111-01-FH02-FKI-18-13185.pdf
person User
user
USER
UsEr
recordtype oai_dc
resourceurl https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=7565
spelling 7565 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=7565 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal application/pdf 6 1.6 Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 20 Paper Capture Plug-in User user USER UsEr 2011-01-22 21:49:13 3111-01-FH02-FKI-18-13185.pdf UniSZA Private Access The Reconciliation Approach in Resolving Contradictory Prophetic Tradition International Journal of Business and Social Science The issue of the prophetic narrations that seem to contradict one another or contrary to Quranic texts or even other facts have been debated and discussed by the hadith scholars long time ago. The scholars, whom are being referred to, always ready to provide interpretations, explanations and conclusions to resolve these so called ‘contradictions’ which in reality can cause a significant impact on the accountability of hadiths as one of the main sources for the Muslims civilization. Hence, this paper aims to analyse and review the method of al-Jam’ (reconciliation) adopted by the scholars of hadith in addressing and resolving the contradictory of hadiths. One of the dominant and chosen methods in solving this problem is by the reconciliation between the meanings and purposes of the hadiths that appeared to contradict one another. 2 3 227-232 Al-Khatib al-Baghdadiy (1986), al-Kifayah fi ‘Ilm al-Riwayah. C.2, Bayrut: Dar al-Kitab al-‘Arabi. ___________________ (1400H), Al-Faqih wa al-Mutafaqqih wa Usul al-Fiqh. C.2, Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al- ‘Ilmiyyah, j.2, h.222. Abu ‘Amr Ibn al-Salah (1986), Ulum al-Hadith.Bayrut: Dar al-Fikt al-Mu’asir. Al-Amir al-Sana‘aniy (t.t.), Taudih al-Afkar li Ma‘ani Tanqih al-Anzar, Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr. ‘Abd al-Hayy al-Laknawiy (1994) Al-Ajwibah al-Fadilah li al-As’ilah al-‘Asyrah al-Kamilah. C. 3, Halab: Maktabah al-Matbu‘at al-Islamiyyah. Al-Imam al-Nawawiy (1987), Syarh Sahih Muslim. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr. Al-Imam Al-Bukhariy (1987), Sahih al-Bukhari, Kaherah: Dar al-Rayyan. Al-Imam Ibn Majah (t.t.), al-Sunan. Bayrut: al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah. Al-Imam Muslim (1987), Sahih Muslim., Kaherah: Dar al-Rayyan li al-Turath. Al-Imam Abu Dawud (1994), al-Sunan.Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr. Al-Imam al-Tirmidhiy (1994), al-Sunan. Bayrut: Dar al-Fikr Al-Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (1313H) Al-Musnad., Kaherah: Dar al-ma’arif. Al-Imam al-Hakim (1990), al-Mustadrak ‘ala al-Sahihayn. Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. Al-Imam al-Syatibiy, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim ibn Musa (1402H), al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Ahkam. C. 6, Kaherah: Dar al-Fikr al-‘Arabi. al-Humaidiy, Abu Bakr ‘Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr (t.t), al-Musnad. Madinah: al-Maktabah al-Salafiyyah. Dr ‘Abd al-Majid al-Susuah (1997), Manhaj al-Tawfiq wa al-Tarjih Bayn Mukhtalif al-Hadith. Amman: Dar al-Nafa’is. Muhammad ibn Idris al-Syafi‘iy (1358H), al-Risalah. Kaherah: al-Babi al-Halabiy. _______________ (1985), Ikhtilaf al-Hadith. Bayrut: Muassasah al-Kutub al-Thaqafiyyah. Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalaniy (t.t.) Nuzhah al-Nazar fi Syarh Nukhbah al-Fikar. Madinah: Maktabah Tayyibah. ______________ (1987), Fath al-Bari bi Syarh al-Bukhariy. Kaherah: Dar al-Rayyan. Salih ibn Ahmad Rida (2001), al- I‘jaz al-‘Ilmiy fi al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah. Riyad: Maktabah al-‘Abikan, Taj al-Din, ‘Abd al-Wahhab ibn ‘Aliy al-Subkiy (1404H), Al-Ibhaj fi Syarh al-Minhaj. Bayrut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. Majalah Wanita, Desember 1996. Utusan Malaysia, ruangan kesihatan 02 April, 2005. www.moh.gov.my/bpk/kempen_kk/kempen_92.htm
spellingShingle The Reconciliation Approach in Resolving Contradictory Prophetic Tradition
summary The issue of the prophetic narrations that seem to contradict one another or contrary to Quranic texts or even other facts have been debated and discussed by the hadith scholars long time ago. The scholars, whom are being referred to, always ready to provide interpretations, explanations and conclusions to resolve these so called ‘contradictions’ which in reality can cause a significant impact on the accountability of hadiths as one of the main sources for the Muslims civilization. Hence, this paper aims to analyse and review the method of al-Jam’ (reconciliation) adopted by the scholars of hadith in addressing and resolving the contradictory of hadiths. One of the dominant and chosen methods in solving this problem is by the reconciliation between the meanings and purposes of the hadiths that appeared to contradict one another.
title The Reconciliation Approach in Resolving Contradictory Prophetic Tradition
title_full The Reconciliation Approach in Resolving Contradictory Prophetic Tradition
title_fullStr The Reconciliation Approach in Resolving Contradictory Prophetic Tradition
title_full_unstemmed The Reconciliation Approach in Resolving Contradictory Prophetic Tradition
title_short The Reconciliation Approach in Resolving Contradictory Prophetic Tradition
title_sort reconciliation approach in resolving contradictory prophetic tradition