Leaf surface characteristics of selected Malaysian weed species of oil palm.

Bibliographic Details
Format: Restricted Document
_version_ 1860799829659090944
building INTELEK Repository
collection Online Access
collectionurl https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
date 2011-07-18 14:41:25
format Restricted Document
id 7561
institution UniSZA
internalnotes Baker, E. A. & Parsons, E. 1971. Scanning electron microscopy of plant cuticles. Journal of Microscopy 94: 39-49. Baker, E. A. 1974. The influence of environment on leaf wax development in Brassica oleracea var. Gemmifer. New Phytology 73: 955-966. Baker, E. A. & Procopiou, J. 1980. Effect of soil moisture status on leaf surface wax yield of some drought-resistant species. Journal of Horticulture Science 55: 85-87. Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: Systemic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 345-355. Barthlott, W. 1990. Scanning electron microscopy of the epidermal surface in plant. In Scanning Electron Microscopy in Taxonomy and Functional Morphology. D. Claughher (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 69-94. Cowlishaw, M. G., Bickerstaffe, R. & Connor, H. E. 1984. Intraspecific variation in the epicuticular wax composition of four species of Chionochloa. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 11(3): 247- 259. Freeman, B., Albrigo, L. G. & Biggs, R. H. 1979. Ultra structure and chemistry of cuticular waxes of developing citrus leaves and fruits. Journal of American Society in Horticultural Science 104: 801-808. Gadelmawla, E. S., Koura, M. M., Maksoud, T. M. A., Elewa, I. M. & Soliman, H. H. 2002. Roughness parameter. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 123: 133-145. Guerfal, M., Baccouri, O., Boujnah, D., Chaibi, W. & Zarrouk, M. 2009. Impact of water stress on gas exchange, water relations, chlorophyll content and leaf structure in the two main Tunisian olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 119: 257-263. Holloway, P. J. & Baker, E. A. 1974. The aerial surfaces of higher plants. In Principles and Techniques of Scanning Electron Microscopy. M. Hayat (ed.). New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold. p. 181-205. Holloway, P. J., Jeffree, C. E. & Baker, E. A. 1976. Structural determination of secondary alcohols from plant epicuticular waxes. Photochemistry 15: 1768-1770. Jetter, R., Schaffer, S. & Riederer, M. 2000. Leaf cuticular waxes are arranged in chemically and mechanically distinct layers; evidence from Prunus laurocerasus L. Plant Cell Environment 23(6): 619-628. Jha, P., Norsworthy, J. K., Riley, M. B., Bielenberg, D. G. & William, B. J. 2008. Acclimation of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to shading. Weed Science 56: 729-734. Kerns, S. G. & Barlocher, F. 2008. Leaf surface roughness influences colonization success of aquatic hyphomyceta conidia. Fungal Ecology 1: 13-18. Kirkwood, R. C. 1987. Uptake and movement of herbicide from plant surfaces and the effects of formulation and environment upon them. In Critical Reports on Applied Chemistry: Pesticides on Plant Surfaces. John Wiley and Sons, Britain. p. 219-243. Koch, K., Neinhuis, C., Ensikat, H. J. & Barthlott, W. 2004. Self assembly of epicuticular waxes on plant surfaces investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Journal of Experimental Botany 55(397): 711-718. McWhorther, C. G., Paul, R. N. & Barrentine, W. L. 1990. Morphology, development and recrystallization of epicuticular waxes of Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Science 38: 22- 33. McWhorther, C. G. 1993. Epicuticular wax on Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) leaves. Weed Science 41: 475-482. Nevo, E., Bolshakova, M. A., Martyn, G. I., Musatenko, L. I., Sytnik, K., Pavlieek, T. & Beharav, A. 2000. Drought and light anatomical adaptative leaf strategies in three woody wood species caused by microclimatic selection at ‘Evolution Canyon’ Israel. Israel Journal of Plant Science 48: 33-46. Schreiber, L., Skrabs, M., Hartmann, K. D., Diamantoloulos, P., Simanova, E. & Santrucek, J. 2001. Effect of humidity on cuticular water permeability of isolated cuticular membranes and leaf disk. Planta 214: 274-282. Schonherr, L. 2000. Calcium chloride penetrates plant cuticles via aqueous pores. Planta 212: 112- 118. Steven, K. R. & Schneider, N. 2004. Cushion size, surface roughness, and the control of water balance and carbon flux in the cushion moss Leucobryum glaucum (Leucobryaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 1164-1172. Whitecross, M. I. & Armstrong, D. J. 1972. Environmental effects on epicuticular waxes of Brassica napus L. Australian Journal of Botany 20: 87-95
originalfilename 3106-01-FH02-FBIM-17-10920.pdf
person Adobe InDesign CS5 (7.0)
recordtype oai_dc
resourceurl https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=7561
spelling 7561 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=7561 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal application/pdf 13 1.6 Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 20 Paper Capture Plug-in Adobe InDesign CS5 (7.0) xmp.did:F77F1174072068118A6DDA55DAEB057D 2011-07-18 14:41:25 3106-01-FH02-FBIM-17-10920.pdf UniSZA Private Access Leaf surface characteristics of selected Malaysian weed species of oil palm. Journal of Agrobiotechnology Laboratory and glasshouse studies were conducted to examine the leaf surface characteristics of selected weed species of oil palm. The broadleaf weeds selected were Asystasia gangetica, Borreria latifolia, Cleome rutidosperma, Clidemia hirta, Diodia ocimifolia and Mikania micrantha, while for the narrow leafs, Axonopus compressus, Cyperus kylingia, Eleusine indica, Paspalum conjugatum and Pennisetum polistachyon were investigated. The weeds were categorized into different types of roughness based on the macroscopic roughness, microscopic roughness and the estimation of three roughness parameters: Ra (arithmetic average height parameter), Rq (root-mean-square roughness parameter, corresponding to Ra), and Rz (average of high peaks and low valleys over the evaluation length). The leaf was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for the surface roughness, while the epicuticular wax content of the leaf was extracted using chloroform. The amount of wax extracted from the weeds varied between species. For broadleaf plants, Mikania micrantha (44.22 µg/cm2) was identified as the plant that contained the highest quantity of wax. Clidemia hirta (24.03 µg/cm2) and Asystasia gangetica (23.03 µg/cm2) were grouped in the plants with a medium quantity of wax while Cleome rutidosperma (16.52 µg/cm2), Borreria latifolia (14.19 µg/cm2) and Diodia ocimifolia (10.75 µg/cm2) were grouped in the plants with a low quantity of cuticular wax weight. For narrow leaf plants, Eleusine indica (44.23 µg/cm2) and Imperata cylindrica (49.88 µg/cm2) were recognized as the plants that contained a high quantity of wax. Pennisetum polystachion (32.16 µg/cm2) and Cyperus kylingia (22.85 µg/cm2) were categorized under the plants with a medium quantity of wax, whereas Paspalum conjugatum (19.59 µg/cm2) and Axonopus compressus (16.78 µg/cm2) were classified under the plant with a low quantity of wax. The wax on the abaxial surface data of the broadleaf weeds was found to be significantly different when compared to the adaxial surface data. In contrast, the amount of wax on the abaxial and adaxial leaf surface of the narrow leaf weeds was more or less similar. For the leaf surface roughness of the broadleaf species, Borreria latifolia was categorized as the roughest, followed by Clidemia hirta, Diodia ocimifolia, Asystasia gangetica and Cleome rutidosperma. Mikania micrantha had the smoothest leaf surface among the broadleaf species. On the other hand, the narrow leaf of Pennisetum polistachyon was identified as the roughest, followed by Imperata cylindrica and Paspalum conjugatum, while Eleusine indica, Axonopus compressus and Cyperus kylingia were categorized as having the smoothest leaf surface. 2 1 53-65 Baker, E. A. & Parsons, E. 1971. Scanning electron microscopy of plant cuticles. Journal of Microscopy 94: 39-49. Baker, E. A. 1974. The influence of environment on leaf wax development in Brassica oleracea var. Gemmifer. New Phytology 73: 955-966. Baker, E. A. & Procopiou, J. 1980. Effect of soil moisture status on leaf surface wax yield of some drought-resistant species. Journal of Horticulture Science 55: 85-87. Barthlott, W. 1981. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: Systemic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 345-355. Barthlott, W. 1990. Scanning electron microscopy of the epidermal surface in plant. In Scanning Electron Microscopy in Taxonomy and Functional Morphology. D. Claughher (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 69-94. Cowlishaw, M. G., Bickerstaffe, R. & Connor, H. E. 1984. Intraspecific variation in the epicuticular wax composition of four species of Chionochloa. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 11(3): 247- 259. Freeman, B., Albrigo, L. G. & Biggs, R. H. 1979. Ultra structure and chemistry of cuticular waxes of developing citrus leaves and fruits. Journal of American Society in Horticultural Science 104: 801-808. Gadelmawla, E. S., Koura, M. M., Maksoud, T. M. A., Elewa, I. M. & Soliman, H. H. 2002. Roughness parameter. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 123: 133-145. Guerfal, M., Baccouri, O., Boujnah, D., Chaibi, W. & Zarrouk, M. 2009. Impact of water stress on gas exchange, water relations, chlorophyll content and leaf structure in the two main Tunisian olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 119: 257-263. Holloway, P. J. & Baker, E. A. 1974. The aerial surfaces of higher plants. In Principles and Techniques of Scanning Electron Microscopy. M. Hayat (ed.). New York: Van Norstrand Reinhold. p. 181-205. Holloway, P. J., Jeffree, C. E. & Baker, E. A. 1976. Structural determination of secondary alcohols from plant epicuticular waxes. Photochemistry 15: 1768-1770. Jetter, R., Schaffer, S. & Riederer, M. 2000. Leaf cuticular waxes are arranged in chemically and mechanically distinct layers; evidence from Prunus laurocerasus L. Plant Cell Environment 23(6): 619-628. Jha, P., Norsworthy, J. K., Riley, M. B., Bielenberg, D. G. & William, B. J. 2008. Acclimation of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to shading. Weed Science 56: 729-734. Kerns, S. G. & Barlocher, F. 2008. Leaf surface roughness influences colonization success of aquatic hyphomyceta conidia. Fungal Ecology 1: 13-18. Kirkwood, R. C. 1987. Uptake and movement of herbicide from plant surfaces and the effects of formulation and environment upon them. In Critical Reports on Applied Chemistry: Pesticides on Plant Surfaces. John Wiley and Sons, Britain. p. 219-243. Koch, K., Neinhuis, C., Ensikat, H. J. & Barthlott, W. 2004. Self assembly of epicuticular waxes on plant surfaces investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Journal of Experimental Botany 55(397): 711-718. McWhorther, C. G., Paul, R. N. & Barrentine, W. L. 1990. Morphology, development and recrystallization of epicuticular waxes of Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Science 38: 22- 33. McWhorther, C. G. 1993. Epicuticular wax on Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) leaves. Weed Science 41: 475-482. Nevo, E., Bolshakova, M. A., Martyn, G. I., Musatenko, L. I., Sytnik, K., Pavlieek, T. & Beharav, A. 2000. Drought and light anatomical adaptative leaf strategies in three woody wood species caused by microclimatic selection at ‘Evolution Canyon’ Israel. Israel Journal of Plant Science 48: 33-46. Schreiber, L., Skrabs, M., Hartmann, K. D., Diamantoloulos, P., Simanova, E. & Santrucek, J. 2001. Effect of humidity on cuticular water permeability of isolated cuticular membranes and leaf disk. Planta 214: 274-282. Schonherr, L. 2000. Calcium chloride penetrates plant cuticles via aqueous pores. Planta 212: 112- 118. Steven, K. R. & Schneider, N. 2004. Cushion size, surface roughness, and the control of water balance and carbon flux in the cushion moss Leucobryum glaucum (Leucobryaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 1164-1172. Whitecross, M. I. & Armstrong, D. J. 1972. Environmental effects on epicuticular waxes of Brassica napus L. Australian Journal of Botany 20: 87-95
spellingShingle Leaf surface characteristics of selected Malaysian weed species of oil palm.
summary Laboratory and glasshouse studies were conducted to examine the leaf surface characteristics of selected weed species of oil palm. The broadleaf weeds selected were Asystasia gangetica, Borreria latifolia, Cleome rutidosperma, Clidemia hirta, Diodia ocimifolia and Mikania micrantha, while for the narrow leafs, Axonopus compressus, Cyperus kylingia, Eleusine indica, Paspalum conjugatum and Pennisetum polistachyon were investigated. The weeds were categorized into different types of roughness based on the macroscopic roughness, microscopic roughness and the estimation of three roughness parameters: Ra (arithmetic average height parameter), Rq (root-mean-square roughness parameter, corresponding to Ra), and Rz (average of high peaks and low valleys over the evaluation length). The leaf was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for the surface roughness, while the epicuticular wax content of the leaf was extracted using chloroform. The amount of wax extracted from the weeds varied between species. For broadleaf plants, Mikania micrantha (44.22 µg/cm2) was identified as the plant that contained the highest quantity of wax. Clidemia hirta (24.03 µg/cm2) and Asystasia gangetica (23.03 µg/cm2) were grouped in the plants with a medium quantity of wax while Cleome rutidosperma (16.52 µg/cm2), Borreria latifolia (14.19 µg/cm2) and Diodia ocimifolia (10.75 µg/cm2) were grouped in the plants with a low quantity of cuticular wax weight. For narrow leaf plants, Eleusine indica (44.23 µg/cm2) and Imperata cylindrica (49.88 µg/cm2) were recognized as the plants that contained a high quantity of wax. Pennisetum polystachion (32.16 µg/cm2) and Cyperus kylingia (22.85 µg/cm2) were categorized under the plants with a medium quantity of wax, whereas Paspalum conjugatum (19.59 µg/cm2) and Axonopus compressus (16.78 µg/cm2) were classified under the plant with a low quantity of wax. The wax on the abaxial surface data of the broadleaf weeds was found to be significantly different when compared to the adaxial surface data. In contrast, the amount of wax on the abaxial and adaxial leaf surface of the narrow leaf weeds was more or less similar. For the leaf surface roughness of the broadleaf species, Borreria latifolia was categorized as the roughest, followed by Clidemia hirta, Diodia ocimifolia, Asystasia gangetica and Cleome rutidosperma. Mikania micrantha had the smoothest leaf surface among the broadleaf species. On the other hand, the narrow leaf of Pennisetum polistachyon was identified as the roughest, followed by Imperata cylindrica and Paspalum conjugatum, while Eleusine indica, Axonopus compressus and Cyperus kylingia were categorized as having the smoothest leaf surface.
title Leaf surface characteristics of selected Malaysian weed species of oil palm.
title_full Leaf surface characteristics of selected Malaysian weed species of oil palm.
title_fullStr Leaf surface characteristics of selected Malaysian weed species of oil palm.
title_full_unstemmed Leaf surface characteristics of selected Malaysian weed species of oil palm.
title_short Leaf surface characteristics of selected Malaysian weed species of oil palm.
title_sort leaf surface characteristics of selected malaysian weed species of oil palm.