| _version_ |
1860799490600992768
|
| building |
INTELEK Repository
|
| collection |
Online Access
|
| collectionurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
|
| date |
2016-04-17 00:34:54
|
| eventvenue |
THAILAND
|
| format |
Restricted Document
|
| id |
6206
|
| institution |
UniSZA
|
| originalfilename |
1007-01-FH03-FUHA-17-08050.pdf
|
| person |
user1
|
| recordtype |
oai_dc
|
| resourceurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=6206
|
| spelling |
6206 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=6206 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Conference Conference Paper application/pdf 1.6 Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 20 Paper Capture Plug-in user1 2016-04-17 00:34:54 1285 1007-01-FH03-FUHA-17-08050.pdf UniSZA Private Access The emerging critiques toward the conception of directors' duties It has long been established that directors and other officers owe their duties to the company alone. Originated from common law, this rule, although have been strictly applied by the courts in Malaysia to draw the borderline between the interests of a company and its members, it does not mean that directors can simply act without taking into account the interests of members who invested their monies into the company‘s capital. This study aims to investigate the reasons for the critiques against the rule arise. The methodology used in this study is an analysis of the literature review, such as books, articles, and court cases related. The study exposes various views highlighted by the experts commenting on the rule and its application in law, as well as the needs for the rule to be revisited. ICLAS 2016 THAILAND
|
| spellingShingle |
The emerging critiques toward the conception of directors' duties
|
| summary |
It has long been established that directors and other officers owe their duties to the company alone. Originated from common law, this rule, although have been strictly applied by the courts in Malaysia to draw the borderline between the interests of a company and its members, it does not mean that directors can simply act without taking into account the interests of members who invested their monies into the company‘s capital. This study aims to investigate the reasons for the critiques against the rule arise. The methodology used in this study is an analysis of the literature review, such as books, articles, and court cases related. The study exposes various views highlighted by the experts commenting on the rule and its application in law, as well as the needs for the rule to be revisited.
|
| title |
The emerging critiques toward the conception of directors' duties
|
| title_full |
The emerging critiques toward the conception of directors' duties
|
| title_fullStr |
The emerging critiques toward the conception of directors' duties
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
The emerging critiques toward the conception of directors' duties
|
| title_short |
The emerging critiques toward the conception of directors' duties
|
| title_sort |
emerging critiques toward the conception of directors' duties
|