Validation of PEAPS-Q-14 (Malay version) among women with abnormal Pap smear results: A reliability and exploratory factor analysis

Bibliographic Details
Format: Restricted Document
_version_ 1860797504454393856
building INTELEK Repository
collection Online Access
collectionurl https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
date 2016-05-25 12:22:27
format Restricted Document
id 13006
institution UniSZA
internalnotes 1 Bennett, A., Irwig, L., Oldenburg, B., Simpson, J.M., Mock, P., Boyes, A., Adams, K., Weisberg, E., Shelley, J. PEAPS-Q Questionnaire to measure the psychosocial effects of having an abnormal Pap Smear. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 10(48):1235-1243 2 Shinn, E., Basen-Engquist, K., Tao Le, Hansis-Diarte, A., Bostic, De’S., Martinez-Cross, J., Santos, A., Follen, M. Distress after an abnormal Pap Smear result: scale development and psychometric validation. Preventive Medicine 2004; 39: 404-412 3 Valdini, A., Esielionis, P. Measurement of colposcopy-associated distress using the psychosocial effects of having an abnormal pap smear-questionnaire in a Latina population. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 2004; 8 (1): 25-32 4 Phonrat, B., Ruengkris, T., Naksrisook, S., Intalapaporn, K., Jirakorbchaipong, P., Pitisuttithum, P. Psychosocial burden of women with abnormal Pap smears. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2009; 40 (3): 593-601 5 Jayathunge, M. PH., Bowanwatanuwong, C., Maek-a-nantawat, W., Phonrat, B., and Pitisuttithum, P. Pscychosocial burden of abnormal Pap Smears among HIV-infected women at Chon Buri Hospital,Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2010;1:224-234 6 Zainal Ariffin, O., & Nor Saleha, I.T. National Cancer Registry Report 2007, Ministry of Health, Malaysia. 2011 7 Drolet, M., Brisson, M., Maunsell, E., Eduardo L. F., Coutlee, F., Ferenczy, Alex., Fisher, William., Mansi, J. A. The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result. Psycho Oncology 2012; 21 (10): 1071-1081 8 Tomás-Aragonés, L., Castillo-Amores, A.B., Rodríguez-Cerdeira, C., MarrónMoya, S.E. Psychosocial aspects associated with the acquisition and development HPV infection and its repercussion on quality of life. The Open Derma Journa 2009; 3:133-136 9 Baze, C., Monk, B.J., Herzog, T.J. The impact of cervical cancer on quality of life: A personal account. Gynecologic Oncology 2008; 109:12-14 10 Hunt, L.M., De Voogd, K.B., Soucy, M.D., Longworth, J.C. Exploring Loss to Follow up: Abnormal Pap Screening in Hispanic Patients. Cancer Pract 2002; 3 :122-129. 11 Costello, A.B., Osborne, J.W. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation 2005; 10 (7) 12 Williams, B., Brown, T., Onsman, A. Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2010; 8 (3) 13 Awang, Z. Research methodology and data analysis. (2nd ed.). Malaysia: Visual Print Sdn Bhd, 2012 14 Gliem, J.A., Gliem, R.R. Calculating, interpreting and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likerttypes scale. Presented at Midwest research to practice conference in adult, continuing and community education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 2003; October 8-10 15 Panayides, P. Research reports: Coefficient Alpha, Interpret with caution. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 2013;9 (4): 687-696 16 Abeysena, C., Jayawardana, P., Peiris, U. Factor structure and reliability of the 12-item Sinhala version of General Health Questionnaire. International journal of collaborative on Internal Medicine & Public Health 2012; 4 (8) 17 Yong, A. G., Pearce, S. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2013; 9(2): 79-94 18 Beavers, A.S., Lounsbury, J.W., Richards, J.K., Huck, S.W., Skolits, G.J., Esquivel, S.L. Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2013; 18 (6): 1-13 19 Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., Strahan, E.J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods 1999; 4(3): 272- 299 20 Plucker, J.A. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in gifted education: examples with self-concept data. Journal for the education of the gifted 2003; 27 (1): 20-35 21 Reise, S.P., Waller, N.G., Comrey, A.L. Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological assessment 2000; 12 (3): 287-297 22 Costello, A.B., Osborne, J.W. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation 2005; 10 (7): 1-9
originalfilename 7317-01-FH02-FP-16-05904.jpg
person norman
recordtype oai_dc
resourceurl https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=13006
spelling 13006 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=13006 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal image/jpeg inches 96 96 norman 1419 774 82 82 2016-05-25 12:22:27 1419x774 7317-01-FH02-FP-16-05904.jpg UniSZA Private Access Validation of PEAPS-Q-14 (Malay version) among women with abnormal Pap smear results: A reliability and exploratory factor analysis Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine Women with an abnormal Pap smear results are susceptible to distress. The objective of this study was to measure the reliability and validity of the Malay version of Psychosocial Effects with an Abnormal Pap Smear Questionnaire 14 Items (PEAPS-Q-14). A cross sectional study was conducted among 70 women with abnormal Pap smear results who were referred to three tertiary hospitals in East Coast Malaysia and completed colposcopy investigation. The self-administered PEAPS-Q-14 comprises of four domains and a total of 14 items. Descriptive analyses, Chronbach’s alpha and exploratory factor analysis were performed to measure the reliability and validity of the Malay version of PEAPS-Q-14. The final model of exploratory factor analysis on the Malay version of PEAPS-Q-14 indicated Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was significant (Chi-square = 404.640, p value < 0.001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) was 0.561. The items were reduced to four factors based on Eigenvalue exceeding 1 after removing an item. The retained 13 items fit the original PEAPS-Q14 subdomains well. The model with full items demonstrated acceptable overall internal consistency of 0.724 respectively. The Chronbach’s alpha of each domain in PEAPS-Q-14 range from 0.666 to 0.917 and only an item (Item 7) under the second factor revealed corrected total item correlation of 0.183. Removal of Item 7 has resulted in better reliability of Factor 2 in which its Chronbach’s alpha increased to 0.752. Therefore, the problematic item (Item 7) will be revised and replaced before further confirmatory factor analysis. This study showed the Malay version for PEAPS-Q-14 were reliable and valid to assess the psychosocial burden among women with abnormal Pap smear results based on exploratory factor analysis. 16 3 Malaysian Public Health Physicians Association Malaysian Public Health Physicians Association 45-51 1 Bennett, A., Irwig, L., Oldenburg, B., Simpson, J.M., Mock, P., Boyes, A., Adams, K., Weisberg, E., Shelley, J. PEAPS-Q Questionnaire to measure the psychosocial effects of having an abnormal Pap Smear. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 10(48):1235-1243 2 Shinn, E., Basen-Engquist, K., Tao Le, Hansis-Diarte, A., Bostic, De’S., Martinez-Cross, J., Santos, A., Follen, M. Distress after an abnormal Pap Smear result: scale development and psychometric validation. Preventive Medicine 2004; 39: 404-412 3 Valdini, A., Esielionis, P. Measurement of colposcopy-associated distress using the psychosocial effects of having an abnormal pap smear-questionnaire in a Latina population. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 2004; 8 (1): 25-32 4 Phonrat, B., Ruengkris, T., Naksrisook, S., Intalapaporn, K., Jirakorbchaipong, P., Pitisuttithum, P. Psychosocial burden of women with abnormal Pap smears. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2009; 40 (3): 593-601 5 Jayathunge, M. PH., Bowanwatanuwong, C., Maek-a-nantawat, W., Phonrat, B., and Pitisuttithum, P. Pscychosocial burden of abnormal Pap Smears among HIV-infected women at Chon Buri Hospital,Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2010;1:224-234 6 Zainal Ariffin, O., & Nor Saleha, I.T. National Cancer Registry Report 2007, Ministry of Health, Malaysia. 2011 7 Drolet, M., Brisson, M., Maunsell, E., Eduardo L. F., Coutlee, F., Ferenczy, Alex., Fisher, William., Mansi, J. A. The psychosocial impact of an abnormal cervical smear result. Psycho Oncology 2012; 21 (10): 1071-1081 8 Tomás-Aragonés, L., Castillo-Amores, A.B., Rodríguez-Cerdeira, C., MarrónMoya, S.E. Psychosocial aspects associated with the acquisition and development HPV infection and its repercussion on quality of life. The Open Derma Journa 2009; 3:133-136 9 Baze, C., Monk, B.J., Herzog, T.J. The impact of cervical cancer on quality of life: A personal account. Gynecologic Oncology 2008; 109:12-14 10 Hunt, L.M., De Voogd, K.B., Soucy, M.D., Longworth, J.C. Exploring Loss to Follow up: Abnormal Pap Screening in Hispanic Patients. Cancer Pract 2002; 3 :122-129. 11 Costello, A.B., Osborne, J.W. Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation 2005; 10 (7) 12 Williams, B., Brown, T., Onsman, A. Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine 2010; 8 (3) 13 Awang, Z. Research methodology and data analysis. (2nd ed.). Malaysia: Visual Print Sdn Bhd, 2012 14 Gliem, J.A., Gliem, R.R. Calculating, interpreting and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likerttypes scale. Presented at Midwest research to practice conference in adult, continuing and community education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 2003; October 8-10 15 Panayides, P. Research reports: Coefficient Alpha, Interpret with caution. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 2013;9 (4): 687-696 16 Abeysena, C., Jayawardana, P., Peiris, U. Factor structure and reliability of the 12-item Sinhala version of General Health Questionnaire. International journal of collaborative on Internal Medicine & Public Health 2012; 4 (8) 17 Yong, A. G., Pearce, S. A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2013; 9(2): 79-94 18 Beavers, A.S., Lounsbury, J.W., Richards, J.K., Huck, S.W., Skolits, G.J., Esquivel, S.L. Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2013; 18 (6): 1-13 19 Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., Strahan, E.J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological methods 1999; 4(3): 272- 299 20 Plucker, J.A. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in gifted education: examples with self-concept data. Journal for the education of the gifted 2003; 27 (1): 20-35 21 Reise, S.P., Waller, N.G., Comrey, A.L. Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological assessment 2000; 12 (3): 287-297 22 Costello, A.B., Osborne, J.W. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation 2005; 10 (7): 1-9
spellingShingle Validation of PEAPS-Q-14 (Malay version) among women with abnormal Pap smear results: A reliability and exploratory factor analysis
summary Women with an abnormal Pap smear results are susceptible to distress. The objective of this study was to measure the reliability and validity of the Malay version of Psychosocial Effects with an Abnormal Pap Smear Questionnaire 14 Items (PEAPS-Q-14). A cross sectional study was conducted among 70 women with abnormal Pap smear results who were referred to three tertiary hospitals in East Coast Malaysia and completed colposcopy investigation. The self-administered PEAPS-Q-14 comprises of four domains and a total of 14 items. Descriptive analyses, Chronbach’s alpha and exploratory factor analysis were performed to measure the reliability and validity of the Malay version of PEAPS-Q-14. The final model of exploratory factor analysis on the Malay version of PEAPS-Q-14 indicated Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was significant (Chi-square = 404.640, p value < 0.001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) was 0.561. The items were reduced to four factors based on Eigenvalue exceeding 1 after removing an item. The retained 13 items fit the original PEAPS-Q14 subdomains well. The model with full items demonstrated acceptable overall internal consistency of 0.724 respectively. The Chronbach’s alpha of each domain in PEAPS-Q-14 range from 0.666 to 0.917 and only an item (Item 7) under the second factor revealed corrected total item correlation of 0.183. Removal of Item 7 has resulted in better reliability of Factor 2 in which its Chronbach’s alpha increased to 0.752. Therefore, the problematic item (Item 7) will be revised and replaced before further confirmatory factor analysis. This study showed the Malay version for PEAPS-Q-14 were reliable and valid to assess the psychosocial burden among women with abnormal Pap smear results based on exploratory factor analysis.
title Validation of PEAPS-Q-14 (Malay version) among women with abnormal Pap smear results: A reliability and exploratory factor analysis
title_full Validation of PEAPS-Q-14 (Malay version) among women with abnormal Pap smear results: A reliability and exploratory factor analysis
title_fullStr Validation of PEAPS-Q-14 (Malay version) among women with abnormal Pap smear results: A reliability and exploratory factor analysis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of PEAPS-Q-14 (Malay version) among women with abnormal Pap smear results: A reliability and exploratory factor analysis
title_short Validation of PEAPS-Q-14 (Malay version) among women with abnormal Pap smear results: A reliability and exploratory factor analysis
title_sort validation of peaps-q-14 (malay version) among women with abnormal pap smear results: a reliability and exploratory factor analysis