| _version_ |
1860797474695806976
|
| building |
INTELEK Repository
|
| collection |
Online Access
|
| collectionurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
|
| date |
2016-02-17 09:37:42
|
| format |
Restricted Document
|
| id |
12869
|
| institution |
UniSZA
|
| internalnotes |
1. Marcucci MC, Bankova VS. Chemical composition, plant origin and biological activity of Brazilian propolis. Current Topics in Phytochemistry 1999; 2:115-123. 2. Bankova V, Popova M, Bogdanov S, Sabatini AG. Chemical composition of European propolis; expected and unexpected results. Z. Naturforsch 2002; 57c:530- 533. 3. Nagy E, Papay V, Litkei G, Dinya Z. Investigation of the chemical constituents, particularly the flavonoid components, of propolis and Populi gemma by the GC/MS method. Studies in Organic Chemistry (Amsterdam)1986; 23:223-232. 4. Cristov R, Bankova V, Tsvetkova I, Kujumgiev A, Delgado TA. Antibacterial furofuran lignans from Canary Islands propolis. Fitoterapia 1999; 70:89-92. 5. Bankova V. Chemical Diversity of Propolis Makes It a Valuable Source of New Biologically Active Compounds. Journal of ApiProduct and ApiMedical Science 2009; 1 (2): 23–28. 6. Salatino A, Teixeira EW, Negri G, and Message D. Origin and Chemical Variation of Brazilian Propolis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2005; 2 (1): 33–38. 7. Tichy J, Novak J. Detection of antimicrobial in bee’s products with activity against viridans streptococci. J Alterne Complement Med. 2000; 6 (5), 383-389. 8. Singleton VL, Rudolf O, Rose L-RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidant by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymology 1999; 299: 152-178. 9. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The Determination of Flavonoid Contents in Mulberry and Their Scavenging Effects on Superoxide Radicals. Food Chemistry 1999; 64: 555- 559.doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2. 10.Sforcin JM, Bankova V. Propolis: is there a potential for the development of new drugs? J Ethnopharmacol 2011; 133: 253–260. 11.Cunha IBS, Morin SEA, Ishimoto GS, Pereira AC, Groto R and Marcucci MC. Standardization of ethanolic extracts of Brazilian propolis. In: The XXXVth International Apicultural Congress of Apimondia 1997. The Centenary Congress 1897-1997. Apimondia Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania. 351. 12.Bankova , Christov R, Kujumgiev A, Marcucci MC, Popov S. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Brazilian propolis. Z Naturforsch 1995; 50c: 167-172. 13.Hegazi AG, Abd El Hady FK, Abd Allah FA. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of European Propolis. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung. Teil C: Biochemie, Biophysik, Biologie, Virologie 2000; 55 (1-2): 70–75. 14.Lewis WH, Moody JC. Experimental Organic Chemistry: Principles and Practice 1989; 159-173 15.Taganna JC, Quanico JP, Perono RMG, Amor EC, Rivera WL. Tannin-rich fraction from Terminalia catappa inhibits quorum sensing (QS) in Chromobacterium violaceum and the QS-controlled biofilm maturation and LasA staphylolytic activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Ethnopharmacol 2011; 134(3):865–871. 16.Zuhrotun A, Halimah E, Diantini A, Prameswari Z. Toxicity of extract and fractions of puspa (Schima wallichii Korth.) bark on Artemia salina Leach. Malaysian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2010; Supplement No. 1: pp. 145. 17.Wettasinghe M, Vasanthan T, Temelli F, Swallow K. Volatile flavour composition of cooked by-product blends of chicken, beef and pork: a quantitative GC-MS investigation. Food Research International 2010; 34: 149-158. 18.Marcucci MC. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 1995; 26: 83-99. 19.Nancy DYC, Hanny W, Nanang N. Classification of Trigona spp bee propolis from four regions in Indonesia using FTIR metabolomics approach. 13th ASEAN Food Conference, Singapore 2013; 9-11. 20.Wen SP. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometer. Chemical Industry Press Beijing 2005; p.241. 21.Kähkönen MP, Hopia I, Vuorela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, Heinonen M. Antioxidant Activity of Plant Extracts Containing Phenolic Compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1999; 47 (10): 3954–62.
|
| originalfilename |
7176-01-FH02-FBIM-16-05359.jpg
|
| person |
norman
|
| recordtype |
oai_dc
|
| resourceurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=12869
|
| spelling |
12869 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=12869 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal image/jpeg inches 96 96 norman 38 38 771 1423 1423x771 2016-02-17 09:37:42 7176-01-FH02-FBIM-16-05359.jpg UniSZA Private Access Antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two Malaysian stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama and Geniotrigona thoracica International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research Propolis is a sticky material collected by the bees to protect their hive. It has been used for medicinal purposes since ancient time. The methanol extract of Malaysian propolis produced by two commonly found stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama (MHI) and Geniotrigona thoracica (MGT) inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus better than Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi) bacteria. However, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values showed the most effective propolis was MHI (5 mg/mL) for Gram-positive and 10 mg/mL for Gram-negative compared to MGT has showed less activity against all tested bacteria. Chemical fingerprint was derived from thin layer chromatography analysis. Both extract displayed a characteristic profile and vary from each other. Analysis of Fourier transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra of both extract tested show similar IR spectral profiles but from the intensities of both extract have significant differences. The results indicate that the differences are caused by group of phenolic and flavonoid. Total phenolic and flavonoid content of MHI of 56.9 ± 0.12 ug/mL and 163.9 ± 0.10 μg/mL, respectively was higher than MGT of 29.1 ± 0.10 ug/mL and 61.5 ± 0.15 μg/mL, respectively. These results showed that the antibacterial activity and chemical analysis of propolis do vary according to its species of stingless bees. 8 1 International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research 156-161 1. Marcucci MC, Bankova VS. Chemical composition, plant origin and biological activity of Brazilian propolis. Current Topics in Phytochemistry 1999; 2:115-123. 2. Bankova V, Popova M, Bogdanov S, Sabatini AG. Chemical composition of European propolis; expected and unexpected results. Z. Naturforsch 2002; 57c:530- 533. 3. Nagy E, Papay V, Litkei G, Dinya Z. Investigation of the chemical constituents, particularly the flavonoid components, of propolis and Populi gemma by the GC/MS method. Studies in Organic Chemistry (Amsterdam)1986; 23:223-232. 4. Cristov R, Bankova V, Tsvetkova I, Kujumgiev A, Delgado TA. Antibacterial furofuran lignans from Canary Islands propolis. Fitoterapia 1999; 70:89-92. 5. Bankova V. Chemical Diversity of Propolis Makes It a Valuable Source of New Biologically Active Compounds. Journal of ApiProduct and ApiMedical Science 2009; 1 (2): 23–28. 6. Salatino A, Teixeira EW, Negri G, and Message D. Origin and Chemical Variation of Brazilian Propolis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2005; 2 (1): 33–38. 7. Tichy J, Novak J. Detection of antimicrobial in bee’s products with activity against viridans streptococci. J Alterne Complement Med. 2000; 6 (5), 383-389. 8. Singleton VL, Rudolf O, Rose L-RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidant by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymology 1999; 299: 152-178. 9. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The Determination of Flavonoid Contents in Mulberry and Their Scavenging Effects on Superoxide Radicals. Food Chemistry 1999; 64: 555- 559.doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2. 10.Sforcin JM, Bankova V. Propolis: is there a potential for the development of new drugs? J Ethnopharmacol 2011; 133: 253–260. 11.Cunha IBS, Morin SEA, Ishimoto GS, Pereira AC, Groto R and Marcucci MC. Standardization of ethanolic extracts of Brazilian propolis. In: The XXXVth International Apicultural Congress of Apimondia 1997. The Centenary Congress 1897-1997. Apimondia Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania. 351. 12.Bankova , Christov R, Kujumgiev A, Marcucci MC, Popov S. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of Brazilian propolis. Z Naturforsch 1995; 50c: 167-172. 13.Hegazi AG, Abd El Hady FK, Abd Allah FA. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of European Propolis. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung. Teil C: Biochemie, Biophysik, Biologie, Virologie 2000; 55 (1-2): 70–75. 14.Lewis WH, Moody JC. Experimental Organic Chemistry: Principles and Practice 1989; 159-173 15.Taganna JC, Quanico JP, Perono RMG, Amor EC, Rivera WL. Tannin-rich fraction from Terminalia catappa inhibits quorum sensing (QS) in Chromobacterium violaceum and the QS-controlled biofilm maturation and LasA staphylolytic activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Ethnopharmacol 2011; 134(3):865–871. 16.Zuhrotun A, Halimah E, Diantini A, Prameswari Z. Toxicity of extract and fractions of puspa (Schima wallichii Korth.) bark on Artemia salina Leach. Malaysian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2010; Supplement No. 1: pp. 145. 17.Wettasinghe M, Vasanthan T, Temelli F, Swallow K. Volatile flavour composition of cooked by-product blends of chicken, beef and pork: a quantitative GC-MS investigation. Food Research International 2010; 34: 149-158. 18.Marcucci MC. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 1995; 26: 83-99. 19.Nancy DYC, Hanny W, Nanang N. Classification of Trigona spp bee propolis from four regions in Indonesia using FTIR metabolomics approach. 13th ASEAN Food Conference, Singapore 2013; 9-11. 20.Wen SP. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometer. Chemical Industry Press Beijing 2005; p.241. 21.Kähkönen MP, Hopia I, Vuorela HJ, Rauha JP, Pihlaja K, Kujala TS, Heinonen M. Antioxidant Activity of Plant Extracts Containing Phenolic Compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1999; 47 (10): 3954–62.
|
| spellingShingle |
Antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two Malaysian stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama and Geniotrigona thoracica
|
| summary |
Propolis is a sticky material collected by the bees to protect their hive. It has been used for medicinal purposes since ancient time. The methanol extract of Malaysian propolis produced by two commonly found stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama (MHI) and Geniotrigona thoracica (MGT) inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus aureus better than Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi) bacteria. However, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values showed the most effective propolis was MHI (5 mg/mL) for Gram-positive and 10 mg/mL for Gram-negative compared to MGT has showed less activity against all tested bacteria. Chemical fingerprint was derived from thin layer chromatography analysis. Both extract displayed a characteristic profile and vary from each other. Analysis of Fourier transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra of both extract tested show similar IR spectral profiles but from the intensities of both extract have significant differences. The results indicate that the differences are caused by group of phenolic and flavonoid. Total phenolic and flavonoid content of MHI of 56.9 ± 0.12 ug/mL and 163.9 ± 0.10 μg/mL, respectively was higher than MGT of 29.1 ± 0.10 ug/mL and 61.5 ± 0.15 μg/mL, respectively. These results showed that the antibacterial activity and chemical analysis of propolis do vary according to its species of stingless bees.
|
| title |
Antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two Malaysian stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama and Geniotrigona thoracica
|
| title_full |
Antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two Malaysian stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama and Geniotrigona thoracica
|
| title_fullStr |
Antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two Malaysian stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama and Geniotrigona thoracica
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two Malaysian stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama and Geniotrigona thoracica
|
| title_short |
Antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two Malaysian stingless bees, Heterotrigona itama and Geniotrigona thoracica
|
| title_sort |
antibacterial and phenolic content of propolis produced by two malaysian stingless bees, heterotrigona itama and geniotrigona thoracica
|