| _version_ |
1860797471023693824
|
| building |
INTELEK Repository
|
| collection |
Online Access
|
| collectionurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
|
| date |
2024-08-27 14:07:48
|
| format |
Restricted Document
|
| id |
12846
|
| institution |
UniSZA
|
| internalnotes |
Abdul Rashid Mohamed, J. Chew and Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan. 2006. Metacognitive reading strategies of good Malaysian Chinese learners. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research 2: 21–41. Alexander, J. and R. Filler. 1976. Attitudes and reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Anderson, N. 2003. Scrolling, clicking and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix 3(3): November 2003. Coiro, J. and E. Dobbler. 2007. Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by 6th grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly 42: 214–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/ RRQ.42.2.2 Coiro, J., M. Knobel, C. Lankshear and D. Leu. eds. 2003. Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Dreyer, C. 1998. Improving students’ reading comprehension by means of strategy instruction. Journal for Language Teaching 31: 18–29. Ghafournia, N. and A. Afghari. 2013. Exploring the relationship between learning strategies, academic disciplines and reading comprehension test performance. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) 16(2): 21–51. Gilbert, J. 2014. Exploring ESL students’ perceptions of their digital reading skills. EdD diss., University of Nottingham. Karbalaei, A. 2010. A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. The Reading Matrix 10(2): 165–180. Kinzer, C. K. and K. M. Leander. 2007. Reconsidering the technology/language arts divide: Electronic and print-based environments. Leu, D. J, C. K. Kinzer, J. L. Coiro and D. W. Cammack. 2004. Towards a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. In Theoretical models and processes of reading, eds. R. B. Ruddel and N. J. Unrau, 1570–1613. Delaware: International Reading Association. Levine, A., O. Ferenz and T. Reves. 2000. EFL academic reading and modern technology: How can we turn our students into independent critical readers? TESL-EJ 4(4): A-1. http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej16/a1.html. Mesgar, M., Nadzrah Abu Bakar and Zaini Amir. 2012. Online metacognitive reading strategies used by postgraduate ESL readers of academic texts. International Journal of Asian Social Science 2(10): 1779–1794. Mokhtari, K. and C. Reichard. 2004. Investigating the strategic reading process of first and second language readers in two different cultural contexts. System 32: 379– 394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.04.005 Mokhtari, K. and R. Sheorey. 2002. Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education 25(3): 2–10. Nik Yusoff, N. S. 2008. The Role of metacognitive strategies in second language reading research. In Reading in a second language: The Malaysian context, eds. Z. Zainal and F. Mohamad Nor. Shah Alam: UPENA. Nor Fazlin Mohd Ramli, Saadiyah Darus and Nadzrah Abu Bakar. 2011. Metacognitive online reading strategies of adult ESL learners using a learning management system. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1(3): 195–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.3.195-204 Nor Shahriza Karim and Amelia Hasan. 2007. Reading habits and attitudes in digital age: Analysis of gender and academic program differences in Malaysia. The Electronic Library 25(3): 285–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 02640470710754805 Omar, N. A. 2014. Online metacognitive reading strategies use by postgraduate Libyan EFL students. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 8(7). http://waset.org/publications/9998887. Oxford, R. L. and J. Burry-Stock. 1995. Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System 23(1): 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346- 251X(94)00047-A Oxford, R. L. and M. Nyikos. 1989.Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal 73(3): 291– 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle. Peacock, M. and B. Ho. 2003. Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13: 179–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00043 Pookcharoen, S. 2009. Metacognitive online reading strategies among Thai EFL university students. PhD diss., Indiana University, USA. Sheorey, R. and K. Mokhtari. 2001. Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native speakers. System 29(4): 431–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2 Spiro, R. J. 2004. Principled pluralism for adaptive flexibility in teaching and learning. In Theoretical models and processes of reading. 5th ed. eds. R. B. Ruddell and N. Unrau, 654–659. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Taki, S. and H. Soleimani. 2012. Online reading strategy use and gender differences: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 3: 173–184. Tan, K. H. and M. L. Liaw. 2009. Empowering Malaysians to read online. European Journal of Social Sciences 8(2): 360–371.
|
| originalfilename |
7153-01-FH02-FBK-18-13642.pdf
|
| person |
Cisco
|
| recordtype |
oai_dc
|
| resourceurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=12846
|
| spelling |
12846 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=12846 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal application/pdf Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 20 Paper Capture Plug-in with ClearScan 16 1.6 Cisco 2024-08-27 14:07:48 7153-01-FH02-FBK-18-13642.pdf UniSZA Private Access Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ Online Reading in Academic Context Malaysian Journal of Distance Education Academic success greatly depends on the ability of students to capitalise the information available at their disposal through improved reading skills. However, the emergence of digital texts has transformed the nature of academic reading as online reading is reported to be different from traditional printed reading. As such, this paper which is based on a study conducted on students in a particular university in Malaysia, was written to investigate the extent of the use of strategies when reading online, in an academic setting and also to investigate whether differences in the use of the strategies between students in different field of studies exist. Findings suggest that students are all users of strategies and field of studies has no bearing on the type of overall strategies preferred. However, significant difference was found for support strategies. One of the implications is the need for class instruction in raising students’ awareness on the importance of varied usage of strategies when reading materials online. 17 2 67-81 Abdul Rashid Mohamed, J. Chew and Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan. 2006. Metacognitive reading strategies of good Malaysian Chinese learners. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research 2: 21–41. Alexander, J. and R. Filler. 1976. Attitudes and reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Anderson, N. 2003. Scrolling, clicking and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix 3(3): November 2003. Coiro, J. and E. Dobbler. 2007. Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by 6th grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly 42: 214–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/ RRQ.42.2.2 Coiro, J., M. Knobel, C. Lankshear and D. Leu. eds. 2003. Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Dreyer, C. 1998. Improving students’ reading comprehension by means of strategy instruction. Journal for Language Teaching 31: 18–29. Ghafournia, N. and A. Afghari. 2013. Exploring the relationship between learning strategies, academic disciplines and reading comprehension test performance. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) 16(2): 21–51. Gilbert, J. 2014. Exploring ESL students’ perceptions of their digital reading skills. EdD diss., University of Nottingham. Karbalaei, A. 2010. A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. The Reading Matrix 10(2): 165–180. Kinzer, C. K. and K. M. Leander. 2007. Reconsidering the technology/language arts divide: Electronic and print-based environments. Leu, D. J, C. K. Kinzer, J. L. Coiro and D. W. Cammack. 2004. Towards a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. In Theoretical models and processes of reading, eds. R. B. Ruddel and N. J. Unrau, 1570–1613. Delaware: International Reading Association. Levine, A., O. Ferenz and T. Reves. 2000. EFL academic reading and modern technology: How can we turn our students into independent critical readers? TESL-EJ 4(4): A-1. http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej16/a1.html. Mesgar, M., Nadzrah Abu Bakar and Zaini Amir. 2012. Online metacognitive reading strategies used by postgraduate ESL readers of academic texts. International Journal of Asian Social Science 2(10): 1779–1794. Mokhtari, K. and C. Reichard. 2004. Investigating the strategic reading process of first and second language readers in two different cultural contexts. System 32: 379– 394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.04.005 Mokhtari, K. and R. Sheorey. 2002. Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education 25(3): 2–10. Nik Yusoff, N. S. 2008. The Role of metacognitive strategies in second language reading research. In Reading in a second language: The Malaysian context, eds. Z. Zainal and F. Mohamad Nor. Shah Alam: UPENA. Nor Fazlin Mohd Ramli, Saadiyah Darus and Nadzrah Abu Bakar. 2011. Metacognitive online reading strategies of adult ESL learners using a learning management system. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 1(3): 195–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.3.195-204 Nor Shahriza Karim and Amelia Hasan. 2007. Reading habits and attitudes in digital age: Analysis of gender and academic program differences in Malaysia. The Electronic Library 25(3): 285–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 02640470710754805 Omar, N. A. 2014. Online metacognitive reading strategies use by postgraduate Libyan EFL students. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 8(7). http://waset.org/publications/9998887. Oxford, R. L. and J. Burry-Stock. 1995. Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System 23(1): 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346- 251X(94)00047-A Oxford, R. L. and M. Nyikos. 1989.Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal 73(3): 291– 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06367.x Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle. Peacock, M. and B. Ho. 2003. Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13: 179–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00043 Pookcharoen, S. 2009. Metacognitive online reading strategies among Thai EFL university students. PhD diss., Indiana University, USA. Sheorey, R. and K. Mokhtari. 2001. Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native speakers. System 29(4): 431–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2 Spiro, R. J. 2004. Principled pluralism for adaptive flexibility in teaching and learning. In Theoretical models and processes of reading. 5th ed. eds. R. B. Ruddell and N. Unrau, 654–659. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Taki, S. and H. Soleimani. 2012. Online reading strategy use and gender differences: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 3: 173–184. Tan, K. H. and M. L. Liaw. 2009. Empowering Malaysians to read online. European Journal of Social Sciences 8(2): 360–371.
|
| spellingShingle |
Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ Online Reading in Academic Context
|
| summary |
Academic success greatly depends on the ability of students to capitalise the information available at their disposal through improved reading skills. However, the emergence of digital texts has transformed the nature of academic reading as online reading is reported to be different from traditional printed reading. As such, this paper which is based on a study conducted on students in a particular university in Malaysia, was written to investigate the extent of the use of strategies when reading online, in an academic setting and also to investigate whether differences in the use of the strategies between students in different field of studies exist. Findings suggest that students are all users of strategies and field of studies has no bearing on the type of overall strategies preferred. However, significant difference was found for support strategies. One of the implications is the need for class instruction in raising students’ awareness on the importance of varied usage of strategies when reading materials online.
|
| title |
Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ Online Reading in Academic Context
|
| title_full |
Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ Online Reading in Academic Context
|
| title_fullStr |
Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ Online Reading in Academic Context
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ Online Reading in Academic Context
|
| title_short |
Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ Online Reading in Academic Context
|
| title_sort |
online survey of reading strategies (osors): students’ online reading in academic context
|