| _version_ |
1860797470309613568
|
| building |
INTELEK Repository
|
| collection |
Online Access
|
| collectionurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
|
| date |
2017-03-12 11:18:35
|
| format |
Restricted Document
|
| id |
12843
|
| institution |
UniSZA
|
| internalnotes |
Alsagoff, S. A. (2003). Principle of the law of contract in Malaysia (2nd ed.). Malaysia: Malayan Law Journal. Aminuddin, M. (2013). Malaysian industrial relations and employment law (8th ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill Education. Ayadurai, D. (1997). Industrial relations in Malaysia: Law and practice. Malaysia: Butterworth. Bergen, H. B. (1940). Managerial prerogative. Harvard Business Review, 18(3), 275–285. Boyle, M. (2007). The relational principle of trust and confidence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 27(4), 633–657. Brodie, D. (2001). Commentary: Mutual trust and the values of the employment contract. Industrial Law Journal, 30(1), 84–100. Cabrelli, D. (2005). The implied duty of mutual trust and confidence: An emerging overarching principle? Industrial Law Journal, 34(4), 284– 307. Contract Act of 1950. Courtalds Northern Textiles Ltd v. Andrew (1979) IRLR 347. Dahlan, M., Hilal, N., & Kamarudin, A. R. (2005). The tests to determine ‘constructive dismissal’: The Malaysian legal perspectives. Retrieved from http://irep.iium.edu.my/8619/1/2005_%2D_ The_tests_to_determine_’constructive_ dismissal’_%2D_the_Malaysian_legal_ perspective.pdf Darrow-Kleinhaus, S. (2001). Good faith: Balancing the right to manage with the right to represent. Labour Law Journal, 52(1), 10–33. Elya Designs Sdn Bhd v. Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor (2011) 3 CLJ 929. Employment Act of 1955. Freedland, M. R. (2003). The personal employment contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Galenson, W. (1992). Labour and economic growth in five Asian countries. London: Praeger. Godfrey, K. (2003). Contracts of employment: Renaissance of the implied term of trust and confidence. Australian Law Journal, 77(11), 764-776. Harrison Ltd v. Mcdonalds and Evans [1952] TLR 101. Industrial Relations Act of 1967. Kamal, N. A., & Mir, A. (2013). Employment law in Malaysia. Malaysia: International Law Book Services. Markey, R. (2004). What is to be done for representative employee participation in Australia? In Proceedings of AIRAANZ: Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand 2004 Conference (Vol. 1). Noosaville: Queensland Australia. McRae, D. M., McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L. C. (1980). Human rights and world public order. Human Right Quarterly, 20(2), 201–234. Mohamed, A. A. (2005). Implied term of trust and confidence in contract of employment. Malayan Law Journal, 3, 22 Mohamad, M. (1991). Malaysian: The way forward (Vision 2020). Retrieved from http://www.epu. jpm.my/02/28/1991 Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v. Gardiner and Another (1984) ICR 612. Parasuraman, B. & Ab Rahman, B. (2011). Employee participation in the public sector in Malaysia: A general overview. Researchers World, 2(1), 55–69. Parasuraman, B. (2014). Employee participation in Malaysia: Theory and practices. Malaysia: UMK PRESS. Rahman, O. A. (2010). Industrial targets of Vision 2020: The science and technology perspective. Journal of Social Economic Planning Sciences, 44(4). Sabahbumi Sandakan Sdn Bhd v. Datuk Yap Pal Leong (1998) 3 MLJ 151. Sharma, B. (2014). Union growth in Malaysia and Singapore: Industrial relation. In B. Parasuraman (Ed.), Employee participation in Malaysia. Malaysia: UMK PRESS. Short v. Handerson (1946) 62 TLR 427. Suhanah, S. S. A. (2002). Law and labour market regulation in Malaysia: Beyond the New Economy Policy. In S. Cooney, R. Lindsey, & Y. Zhu (Eds.), Law and labour market regulation in East Asia. London: Routledge. Storey, J. (1976). Workplace collective bargaining and managerial prerogative. Industrial Relation Journal, 7(3), 40–55. Storey, J. (1983). Managerial prerogative and the question control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Sundra-Karean, V. (2012). Employment law and theory: A Malaysian focus with a comparative perspective. Malaysia: CLJ Publication. Wood v. WM Car Services (Petersborough) Ltd 1981 IRLR 347. Yewens v. Nokes (1880) 6 QBD 530. Yong, S. (1963). The question of managerial prerogative. Industrial and Labor Relations Reviews, 16(2), 240–253.
|
| originalfilename |
7150-01-FH02-FUHA-17-08435.jpg
|
| person |
norman
|
| recordtype |
oai_dc
|
| resourceurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=12843
|
| spelling |
12843 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=12843 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal image/jpeg inches 96 96 norman 01 01 1438 761 2017-03-12 11:18:35 1438x761 7150-01-FH02-FUHA-17-08435.jpg UniSZA Private Access Employer's managerial prerogative right: An evaluation of its relevancy to the employer-employee relationship Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities The contract of employment is the main instrument governing an employment relationship, with explicit deliberations on the rights and duties of parties to the contract, namely the employer and the employee. In a collective bargaining process, trade unions will scrutinise the terms and conditions of a contract of employment to seek possibilities of engaging and expanding the employer's managerial prerogative right in the bargaining process to maintain industrial harmony. Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 has limited trade unions from encroaching on the employer's managerial prerogative rights in a collective bargaining process. Thus, employers are vested with vast discretionary power in the exercise of their day-today management duties. This particular section has triggered the query as to whether managerial prerogative right is absolute and unchallengeable by employees. The purpose of this article is to investigate the relevancy of managerial prerogative on the employer-employee relationship. As an initial study into the concept of managerial prerogative right, the methods used are the doctrinal analysis of statutory provisions, judicial decisions and relevant government policies. 23 Universiti Putra Malaysia Universiti Putra Malaysia 227-238 Alsagoff, S. A. (2003). Principle of the law of contract in Malaysia (2nd ed.). Malaysia: Malayan Law Journal. Aminuddin, M. (2013). Malaysian industrial relations and employment law (8th ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill Education. Ayadurai, D. (1997). Industrial relations in Malaysia: Law and practice. Malaysia: Butterworth. Bergen, H. B. (1940). Managerial prerogative. Harvard Business Review, 18(3), 275–285. Boyle, M. (2007). The relational principle of trust and confidence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 27(4), 633–657. Brodie, D. (2001). Commentary: Mutual trust and the values of the employment contract. Industrial Law Journal, 30(1), 84–100. Cabrelli, D. (2005). The implied duty of mutual trust and confidence: An emerging overarching principle? Industrial Law Journal, 34(4), 284– 307. Contract Act of 1950. Courtalds Northern Textiles Ltd v. Andrew (1979) IRLR 347. Dahlan, M., Hilal, N., & Kamarudin, A. R. (2005). The tests to determine ‘constructive dismissal’: The Malaysian legal perspectives. Retrieved from http://irep.iium.edu.my/8619/1/2005_%2D_ The_tests_to_determine_’constructive_ dismissal’_%2D_the_Malaysian_legal_ perspective.pdf Darrow-Kleinhaus, S. (2001). Good faith: Balancing the right to manage with the right to represent. Labour Law Journal, 52(1), 10–33. Elya Designs Sdn Bhd v. Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor (2011) 3 CLJ 929. Employment Act of 1955. Freedland, M. R. (2003). The personal employment contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Galenson, W. (1992). Labour and economic growth in five Asian countries. London: Praeger. Godfrey, K. (2003). Contracts of employment: Renaissance of the implied term of trust and confidence. Australian Law Journal, 77(11), 764-776. Harrison Ltd v. Mcdonalds and Evans [1952] TLR 101. Industrial Relations Act of 1967. Kamal, N. A., & Mir, A. (2013). Employment law in Malaysia. Malaysia: International Law Book Services. Markey, R. (2004). What is to be done for representative employee participation in Australia? In Proceedings of AIRAANZ: Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand 2004 Conference (Vol. 1). Noosaville: Queensland Australia. McRae, D. M., McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L. C. (1980). Human rights and world public order. Human Right Quarterly, 20(2), 201–234. Mohamed, A. A. (2005). Implied term of trust and confidence in contract of employment. Malayan Law Journal, 3, 22 Mohamad, M. (1991). Malaysian: The way forward (Vision 2020). Retrieved from http://www.epu. jpm.my/02/28/1991 Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v. Gardiner and Another (1984) ICR 612. Parasuraman, B. & Ab Rahman, B. (2011). Employee participation in the public sector in Malaysia: A general overview. Researchers World, 2(1), 55–69. Parasuraman, B. (2014). Employee participation in Malaysia: Theory and practices. Malaysia: UMK PRESS. Rahman, O. A. (2010). Industrial targets of Vision 2020: The science and technology perspective. Journal of Social Economic Planning Sciences, 44(4). Sabahbumi Sandakan Sdn Bhd v. Datuk Yap Pal Leong (1998) 3 MLJ 151. Sharma, B. (2014). Union growth in Malaysia and Singapore: Industrial relation. In B. Parasuraman (Ed.), Employee participation in Malaysia. Malaysia: UMK PRESS. Short v. Handerson (1946) 62 TLR 427. Suhanah, S. S. A. (2002). Law and labour market regulation in Malaysia: Beyond the New Economy Policy. In S. Cooney, R. Lindsey, & Y. Zhu (Eds.), Law and labour market regulation in East Asia. London: Routledge. Storey, J. (1976). Workplace collective bargaining and managerial prerogative. Industrial Relation Journal, 7(3), 40–55. Storey, J. (1983). Managerial prerogative and the question control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Sundra-Karean, V. (2012). Employment law and theory: A Malaysian focus with a comparative perspective. Malaysia: CLJ Publication. Wood v. WM Car Services (Petersborough) Ltd 1981 IRLR 347. Yewens v. Nokes (1880) 6 QBD 530. Yong, S. (1963). The question of managerial prerogative. Industrial and Labor Relations Reviews, 16(2), 240–253.
|
| spellingShingle |
Employer's managerial prerogative right: An evaluation of its relevancy to the employer-employee relationship
|
| summary |
The contract of employment is the main instrument governing an employment relationship, with explicit deliberations on the rights and duties of parties to the contract, namely the employer and the employee. In a collective bargaining process, trade unions will scrutinise the terms and conditions of a contract of employment to seek possibilities of engaging and expanding the employer's managerial prerogative right in the bargaining process to maintain industrial harmony. Section 13 of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 has limited trade unions from encroaching on the employer's managerial prerogative rights in a collective bargaining process. Thus, employers are vested with vast discretionary power in the exercise of their day-today management duties. This particular section has triggered the query as to whether managerial prerogative right is absolute and unchallengeable by employees. The purpose of this article is to investigate the relevancy of managerial prerogative on the employer-employee relationship. As an initial study into the concept of managerial prerogative right, the methods used are the doctrinal analysis of statutory provisions, judicial decisions and relevant government policies.
|
| title |
Employer's managerial prerogative right: An evaluation of its relevancy to the employer-employee relationship
|
| title_full |
Employer's managerial prerogative right: An evaluation of its relevancy to the employer-employee relationship
|
| title_fullStr |
Employer's managerial prerogative right: An evaluation of its relevancy to the employer-employee relationship
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Employer's managerial prerogative right: An evaluation of its relevancy to the employer-employee relationship
|
| title_short |
Employer's managerial prerogative right: An evaluation of its relevancy to the employer-employee relationship
|
| title_sort |
employer's managerial prerogative right: an evaluation of its relevancy to the employer-employee relationship
|