The consequences of Ataturk’s secularization on Turkey
| Format: | Restricted Document |
|---|
| _version_ | 1860797312131923968 |
|---|---|
| building | INTELEK Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| collectionurl | https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 |
| date | 2015-07-27 10:45:45 |
| format | Restricted Document |
| id | 12199 |
| institution | UniSZA |
| internalnotes | Armstrong, H. G. (1961). The Grey Wolf. New York: Capricorn Books. Bein, A. (2011). Ottoman Ulema, Turkish Republic: Agents of Change and Guardians of Tradition. California: Stanford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804773119.001.0001 Cleveland, W. L. (1986). A History of the Modern Middle East. Colorado: West View Press. Fisher, S. N. (1959). The Middle East: A History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. Jameelah, M. (1975). Islam and Modernism. Lahore: Kazi Publication. Karakus, H. (2005). Turkey and the European Union (EU): Kemalism’s Effects on the Road to the EU (M. A. Thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, California, US. Karpat, K. H. (1970). Modern Turkey. In P. M. Holt, & A. K. S. Lambton (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Islam (Vol. 1). London: Cambridge University Press. Kedourie, E. (1992). Politics in the Middle East. Oxford University Press. Lewis, B. (1968). The Emergence of Modern Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lost Islamic History. (2011). Retrieved from http://lostislamichistory.com/article/ Mansfield, P. (1973). The Ottoman Empire and its Successors. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Nayir, Y. N. (1968). Ataturkism Is Secularism. In K. H. Karpat (Ed.), Politics and Social Thought in the Contemporary Middle East. London: Pall Mall Publication. Robinson, R. D. (1963). The First Turkish Republic: A Case Study in National Development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420465 Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved December 17, 2014, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp Yapp, M. E. (1991). The Near East Since The First World War. London: Longman. Yegidis, B. L., & Weinbach, R. W. (2002). Research Methods for Social Workers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. |
| originalfilename | 6499-01-FH02-FKI-15-03535.jpg |
| person | UniSZA Unisza unisza |
| recordtype | oai_dc |
| resourceurl | https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=12199 |
| spelling | 12199 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=12199 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal UniSZA Unisza unisza image/jpeg inches 96 96 1418 789 92 92 2015-07-27 10:45:45 1418x789 6499-01-FH02-FKI-15-03535.jpg UniSZA Private Access The consequences of Ataturk’s secularization on Turkey Asian Social Science Mustafa Kamal Ataturk was known as one of the important figures responsible in making new modern Turkey. Resulting from his modernization and secularization process, there were several consequences upon Turkish nations in particular that related to social and religious as well as political aspects. This paper discusses some of those consequences in the contexts of modern Turkey. Using a secondary data analysis, published materials written by scholars and writers in the field, the study found that Kemal’s reforms had totally brought a new system of life based on the western style whilst rejecting Islamic tradition and its culture. This includes his policy to terminate the political role of Islam or taking Islam out of politics. Kemal’s modernization could be regarded as one of the main factors for the social and religious changes in modern Turkey. 11 21 Canadian Center of Science and Education Canadian Center of Science and Education 350-354 Armstrong, H. G. (1961). The Grey Wolf. New York: Capricorn Books. Bein, A. (2011). Ottoman Ulema, Turkish Republic: Agents of Change and Guardians of Tradition. California: Stanford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804773119.001.0001 Cleveland, W. L. (1986). A History of the Modern Middle East. Colorado: West View Press. Fisher, S. N. (1959). The Middle East: A History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. Jameelah, M. (1975). Islam and Modernism. Lahore: Kazi Publication. Karakus, H. (2005). Turkey and the European Union (EU): Kemalism’s Effects on the Road to the EU (M. A. Thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, California, US. Karpat, K. H. (1970). Modern Turkey. In P. M. Holt, & A. K. S. Lambton (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Islam (Vol. 1). London: Cambridge University Press. Kedourie, E. (1992). Politics in the Middle East. Oxford University Press. Lewis, B. (1968). The Emergence of Modern Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lost Islamic History. (2011). Retrieved from http://lostislamichistory.com/article/ Mansfield, P. (1973). The Ottoman Empire and its Successors. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Nayir, Y. N. (1968). Ataturkism Is Secularism. In K. H. Karpat (Ed.), Politics and Social Thought in the Contemporary Middle East. London: Pall Mall Publication. Robinson, R. D. (1963). The First Turkish Republic: A Case Study in National Development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674420465 Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved December 17, 2014, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp Yapp, M. E. (1991). The Near East Since The First World War. London: Longman. Yegidis, B. L., & Weinbach, R. W. (2002). Research Methods for Social Workers. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. |
| spellingShingle | The consequences of Ataturk’s secularization on Turkey |
| summary | Mustafa Kamal Ataturk was known as one of the important figures responsible in making new modern Turkey. Resulting from his modernization and secularization process, there were several consequences upon Turkish nations in particular that related to social and religious as well as political aspects. This paper discusses some of those consequences in the contexts of modern Turkey. Using a secondary data analysis, published materials written by scholars and writers in the field, the study found that Kemal’s reforms had totally brought a new system of life based on the western style whilst rejecting Islamic tradition and its culture. This includes his policy to terminate the political role of Islam or taking Islam out of politics. Kemal’s modernization could be regarded as one of the main factors for the social and religious changes in modern Turkey. |
| title | The consequences of Ataturk’s secularization on Turkey |
| title_full | The consequences of Ataturk’s secularization on Turkey |
| title_fullStr | The consequences of Ataturk’s secularization on Turkey |
| title_full_unstemmed | The consequences of Ataturk’s secularization on Turkey |
| title_short | The consequences of Ataturk’s secularization on Turkey |
| title_sort | consequences of ataturk’s secularization on turkey |