| _version_ |
1860797249712291840
|
| building |
INTELEK Repository
|
| collection |
Online Access
|
| collectionurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
|
| date |
2024-08-26 17:53:05
|
| format |
Restricted Document
|
| id |
11947
|
| institution |
UniSZA
|
| internalnotes |
Aleamoni, L. M. (1987). Typical faculty concerns about student evaluation of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 31, 25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219873105 Arthur, L. (2009). From performativity to professionalism: Lecturers’ responses to student feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 441-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510903050228 Beran, T. N., & Rokosh, J. L. (2009). Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction. Instructional Science, 37(2), 171-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9045-2 Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Christopher, K. S., & Shane, P. D. (2007). Pharmacy students’ perceptions of a teaching evaluation process. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(1). Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (1990). Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured? Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 122-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475304273525 Clifford, R. (1999). Quality control in college teaching.Issues in College Teaching, 9(2), 11-20. Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta analysis of multi-section validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543051003281 Comm, C. L., & Manthaisel, D. F. X. (1998). Evaluating teaching effectiveness in America’s business schools: Implications for service marketers. Journal of Professional Service Marketing, 16, 163-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J090v16n02_09 Cross, R. (2002). Measuring Quality in Education. New York: El-Kley. Dweck, C. S., & Bush, E. S. (1976). Sex differences in learned helplessness: I. Differential debilitation with peer and adult evaluators. Developmental Psychology, 12, 147-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.12.2.147 George, D., & Mallery, P. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Step by Step: A simple guide and reference (12th ed.). Pearson. Gold, R. (2001). Evaluation of instruction. Educational Studies, 15(1), 31-42. Harun, S., Dazz, S. K., Saaludin, N., & Che-Wan-Ahmad, W. S. (2011). Lecturer’s perception on student evaluation at Universiti Kuala Lumpur. Enhancing Learning: Teaching and Learning Conference (pp. 1-10). Hussin, Z., Jusoff, K., & Wan-Omar, M. (2008). Perception of Students Teaching Quality Determinants and Effectiveness. Asian Social Science, 4(12), 113-117. Idaka, I. I., Joshua, M. T., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). Attitude of academic staff in Nigerian tertiary educational institutions to student evaluation of instruction (SEI). National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 23(4). Imogie, A. I. (2000). Do you know who is teaching your child? Benin City: University of Benin Press. Isiaka, B. T. (1998). Teachers’ perception of students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness. Lagos Journal of Education (Special edition), 6-11. Iyamu, E. O. S. (1998). Assessment of the inquiry-teaching competences of social studies teachers in junior secondary schools in Edo State (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria. Iyamu, E. O. S., & Aduwa, J. (2005). Assessment of the Inquiry-Teaching Competences of Social Studies Teachers in Junior Secondary Schools in Edo State. University of Benin: Benin. Iyamu, E. O. S., & Aduwa, J. (2005). Lecturers’s perception of students’ evaluation in Nigerian universities. International Education Journal, 6(5), 619-625. Jackson, M. (1998). Teacher characteristics and teaching effectiveness. Studies in Education, 12, 101-112. Joshua, M. T. (1999). Faculty evaluation as a panacea for enhancing quality teaching in Nigeria’s tertiary education. Nigerian Education Journal, 2(2), 97-111. Kilpatrick, A. (1997). Another look at teaching Evaluation in American Junior Colleges. California: El Camino College. Kogan, L. R., Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., & Hellyer, P. W. (2010). Student evaluations of teaching: Perceptions of faculty based on gender, position and rank. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 623-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.491911 Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 30, 607-610. Lungren, D. C., & Rudawsky, D. J. (1998). Female and male college students’ responses to negative feedback from parents and peers. Sex Roles, 39, 409-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018823126219 Machingambi, S., & Wadesango, N. (2011). University lecturers’ perceptions of students evaluation of their instructional practices. Anthropologist, 13(3), 167-174. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.707 Marsh, W., & Bailey, M. (1993). Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 6, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2959975 McKeachie, W. (1990). Research on college teaching: The historical background. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2). 189-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.189 Nasser, F., & Fresko, B. (2002). Faculty views of student evaluation of college teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 187-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930220128751 Nicholls, J. G. (1975). Causal attribution and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 379-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076505 Olatoye, R. A., & Aanu, E. M. (2011). Senior secondary school science teachers’ perception of using students to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Journal of Emerging Trends in Education Research and Policy Studies, 164-170. Ory, J. C. (1991). Changes in evaluating teaching in higher education. Theory into Practice, 30(1), 30-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543473 Otote, C. O. (2004). Assessment of the Affective Evaluation Competences of Social Studies Teachers in Junior Secondary Schools in Edo State (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria. Richmond, E. (2003). Looking at good teaching. Educational Evaluation, 35(1), 48-59. Ronald Jr, D. F., & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature. Field Methods, 14(4), 347-367. Salah-ud-din, K., Mearaj-ud-din, & Muhammad-Shah. (2006). Development of a reliability and valid instrument for the evaluation of performance of directors of physical education. Gomal University Journal of Research, 22, 29-36. Santiago, P., & Benavides, F. (2009). Teacher Evaluation, A Conceptual Framework and Examples of Country Practices. Paper presented at the OECD-Mexico Workshop towards a Teacher Evaluation Framework, Mexico, 12 August 2009. Smith, S., & Anderson, L. O. (2003). Student evaluation practice in selected American Colleges. International Journal of Education, 22(1), 81-92. Smock, H. R., & Crooks, T. J. (1973). A plan for the comprehensive evaluation of college teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44, 577-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1980392 Sulong, M. S. (2014). Lecturers’ perception on teaching evaluation: Selection of research instruments. The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education, 1(2), 36-44. Tan, J. H. (2007). Statistical techniques in business research: a practical approach. Malaysia: Prentice Hall. Urevbu, A. O. (1997). Creating the school we deserve: Reflections on Education, Pedagogy and Curriculum. Benin City: University of Benin. Weinberg, B. A., Hashimoto, M., & Fleisher, B. M. (2009). Evaluating teaching in higher education. Journal of Economic Education, 40, 227-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JECE.40.3.227-261 Yusuf, A. R., Ajidagba, U. A. R., Agbonna, S. A., & Olumurin, C. O. (2010). University teachers’ perception of the effects of students evaluation of teaching on lecturers instructional practices in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Collaborational of Education Faculties in West Africa (CEFWA) (pp. 1-16). Zabaleta, F. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 55-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131
|
| originalfilename |
6248-01-FH02-FBK-15-03340.pdf
|
| person |
administrator
Administrator
|
| recordtype |
oai_dc
|
| resourceurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=11947
|
| spelling |
11947 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=11947 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal application/pdf Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 20 Paper Capture Plug-in with ClearScan 11 1.6 administrator Administrator 2024-08-26 17:53:05 6248-01-FH02-FBK-15-03340.pdf UniSZA Private Access Lecturer’s Gender and Their Valuation of Student Evaluation of Teaching International Education Studies Student evaluation of teaching (SET) is carried out every semester at Malaysian universities and lecturers are evaluated based on student ratings. But very little is researched about what lecturers actually think about SET and whether it serves any meaningful purpose at all. This quantitative study involving six public universities on the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia examines the extent to which male and female lecturers value their student evaluations of teaching (SET) and if their valuations differ significantly by gender. The study also elicits perceptions of male and female lecturers on the formative and summative functions the SET serves. A survey questionnaire comprising 29 Likert-scale items was employed to obtain data for this study. The respondents comprised 137 language instructors of English and Arabic proficiency courses for undergraduates from those six universities. Data were analysed descriptively and inferentially using descriptive statistics and independent sample t-test. The study produces several outcomes. The study found that although male lecturers value SET higher than their female colleagues, no significant differences are observed in their valuation of SET by gender. Also of significance is the observation that lecturers of both gender found SET more useful for formative rather than summative functions. This study itself is significant in order to understand the lecturers’ perceptions of SET which will stimulate further discussions and thinking around the issue of strengthening the teaching practice as SET itself can be an effective tool for lecturer’s development if lecturers themselves understand and value the process. 8 6 132-141 Aleamoni, L. M. (1987). Typical faculty concerns about student evaluation of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 31, 25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219873105 Arthur, L. (2009). From performativity to professionalism: Lecturers’ responses to student feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 441-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510903050228 Beran, T. N., & Rokosh, J. L. (2009). Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction. Instructional Science, 37(2), 171-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9045-2 Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Christopher, K. S., & Shane, P. D. (2007). Pharmacy students’ perceptions of a teaching evaluation process. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(1). Clayson, D. E., & Haley, D. A. (1990). Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured? Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 122-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475304273525 Clifford, R. (1999). Quality control in college teaching.Issues in College Teaching, 9(2), 11-20. Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta analysis of multi-section validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543051003281 Comm, C. L., & Manthaisel, D. F. X. (1998). Evaluating teaching effectiveness in America’s business schools: Implications for service marketers. Journal of Professional Service Marketing, 16, 163-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J090v16n02_09 Cross, R. (2002). Measuring Quality in Education. New York: El-Kley. Dweck, C. S., & Bush, E. S. (1976). Sex differences in learned helplessness: I. Differential debilitation with peer and adult evaluators. Developmental Psychology, 12, 147-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.12.2.147 George, D., & Mallery, P. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics 19 Step by Step: A simple guide and reference (12th ed.). Pearson. Gold, R. (2001). Evaluation of instruction. Educational Studies, 15(1), 31-42. Harun, S., Dazz, S. K., Saaludin, N., & Che-Wan-Ahmad, W. S. (2011). Lecturer’s perception on student evaluation at Universiti Kuala Lumpur. Enhancing Learning: Teaching and Learning Conference (pp. 1-10). Hussin, Z., Jusoff, K., & Wan-Omar, M. (2008). Perception of Students Teaching Quality Determinants and Effectiveness. Asian Social Science, 4(12), 113-117. Idaka, I. I., Joshua, M. T., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). Attitude of academic staff in Nigerian tertiary educational institutions to student evaluation of instruction (SEI). National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 23(4). Imogie, A. I. (2000). Do you know who is teaching your child? Benin City: University of Benin Press. Isiaka, B. T. (1998). Teachers’ perception of students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness. Lagos Journal of Education (Special edition), 6-11. Iyamu, E. O. S. (1998). Assessment of the inquiry-teaching competences of social studies teachers in junior secondary schools in Edo State (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria. Iyamu, E. O. S., & Aduwa, J. (2005). Assessment of the Inquiry-Teaching Competences of Social Studies Teachers in Junior Secondary Schools in Edo State. University of Benin: Benin. Iyamu, E. O. S., & Aduwa, J. (2005). Lecturers’s perception of students’ evaluation in Nigerian universities. International Education Journal, 6(5), 619-625. Jackson, M. (1998). Teacher characteristics and teaching effectiveness. Studies in Education, 12, 101-112. Joshua, M. T. (1999). Faculty evaluation as a panacea for enhancing quality teaching in Nigeria’s tertiary education. Nigerian Education Journal, 2(2), 97-111. Kilpatrick, A. (1997). Another look at teaching Evaluation in American Junior Colleges. California: El Camino College. Kogan, L. R., Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., & Hellyer, P. W. (2010). Student evaluations of teaching: Perceptions of faculty based on gender, position and rank. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 623-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.491911 Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 30, 607-610. Lungren, D. C., & Rudawsky, D. J. (1998). Female and male college students’ responses to negative feedback from parents and peers. Sex Roles, 39, 409-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018823126219 Machingambi, S., & Wadesango, N. (2011). University lecturers’ perceptions of students evaluation of their instructional practices. Anthropologist, 13(3), 167-174. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.707 Marsh, W., & Bailey, M. (1993). Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 6, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2959975 McKeachie, W. (1990). Research on college teaching: The historical background. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2). 189-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.189 Nasser, F., & Fresko, B. (2002). Faculty views of student evaluation of college teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 187-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930220128751 Nicholls, J. G. (1975). Causal attribution and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 379-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076505 Olatoye, R. A., & Aanu, E. M. (2011). Senior secondary school science teachers’ perception of using students to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Journal of Emerging Trends in Education Research and Policy Studies, 164-170. Ory, J. C. (1991). Changes in evaluating teaching in higher education. Theory into Practice, 30(1), 30-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543473 Otote, C. O. (2004). Assessment of the Affective Evaluation Competences of Social Studies Teachers in Junior Secondary Schools in Edo State (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria. Richmond, E. (2003). Looking at good teaching. Educational Evaluation, 35(1), 48-59. Ronald Jr, D. F., & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature. Field Methods, 14(4), 347-367. Salah-ud-din, K., Mearaj-ud-din, & Muhammad-Shah. (2006). Development of a reliability and valid instrument for the evaluation of performance of directors of physical education. Gomal University Journal of Research, 22, 29-36. Santiago, P., & Benavides, F. (2009). Teacher Evaluation, A Conceptual Framework and Examples of Country Practices. Paper presented at the OECD-Mexico Workshop towards a Teacher Evaluation Framework, Mexico, 12 August 2009. Smith, S., & Anderson, L. O. (2003). Student evaluation practice in selected American Colleges. International Journal of Education, 22(1), 81-92. Smock, H. R., & Crooks, T. J. (1973). A plan for the comprehensive evaluation of college teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44, 577-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1980392 Sulong, M. S. (2014). Lecturers’ perception on teaching evaluation: Selection of research instruments. The Online Journal of Quality in Higher Education, 1(2), 36-44. Tan, J. H. (2007). Statistical techniques in business research: a practical approach. Malaysia: Prentice Hall. Urevbu, A. O. (1997). Creating the school we deserve: Reflections on Education, Pedagogy and Curriculum. Benin City: University of Benin. Weinberg, B. A., Hashimoto, M., & Fleisher, B. M. (2009). Evaluating teaching in higher education. Journal of Economic Education, 40, 227-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JECE.40.3.227-261 Yusuf, A. R., Ajidagba, U. A. R., Agbonna, S. A., & Olumurin, C. O. (2010). University teachers’ perception of the effects of students evaluation of teaching on lecturers instructional practices in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Collaborational of Education Faculties in West Africa (CEFWA) (pp. 1-16). Zabaleta, F. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 55-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131
|
| spellingShingle |
Lecturer’s Gender and Their Valuation of Student Evaluation of Teaching
|
| summary |
Student evaluation of teaching (SET) is carried out every semester at Malaysian universities and lecturers are evaluated based on student ratings. But very little is researched about what lecturers actually think about SET and whether it serves any meaningful purpose at all. This quantitative study involving six public universities on the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia examines the extent to which male and female lecturers value their student evaluations of teaching (SET) and if their valuations differ significantly by gender. The study also elicits perceptions of male and female lecturers on the formative and summative functions the SET serves. A survey questionnaire comprising 29 Likert-scale items was employed to obtain data for this study. The respondents comprised 137 language instructors of English and Arabic proficiency courses for undergraduates from those six universities. Data were analysed descriptively and inferentially using descriptive statistics and independent sample t-test. The study produces several outcomes. The study found that although male lecturers value SET higher than their female colleagues, no significant differences are observed in their valuation of SET by gender. Also of significance is the observation that lecturers of both gender found SET more useful for formative rather than summative functions. This study itself is significant in order to understand the lecturers’ perceptions of SET which will stimulate further discussions and thinking around the issue of strengthening the teaching practice as SET itself can be an effective tool for lecturer’s development if lecturers themselves understand and value the process.
|
| title |
Lecturer’s Gender and Their Valuation of Student Evaluation of Teaching
|
| title_full |
Lecturer’s Gender and Their Valuation of Student Evaluation of Teaching
|
| title_fullStr |
Lecturer’s Gender and Their Valuation of Student Evaluation of Teaching
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Lecturer’s Gender and Their Valuation of Student Evaluation of Teaching
|
| title_short |
Lecturer’s Gender and Their Valuation of Student Evaluation of Teaching
|
| title_sort |
lecturer’s gender and their valuation of student evaluation of teaching
|