Technical considerations in designing haptic applications: A case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements
| Format: | Restricted Document |
|---|
| _version_ | 1860797095826423808 |
|---|---|
| building | INTELEK Repository |
| collection | Online Access |
| collectionurl | https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 |
| date | 2015-01-11 08:26:49 |
| format | Restricted Document |
| id | 11355 |
| institution | UniSZA |
| internalnotes | Alan Liu, F., Tendick, K., Clerly, & Kaufmann C., (2003). A survey of surgical simulation: Application, technology and education. Presence, 12(6), 599–614. Basdogan, C., Chih-Hao Ho, & Mandayam, A. Srinivasan. (2001). Virtual environments for medical training: Graphical and haptic simulation of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Mechatronics, IEEE/ ASME Transactions, 6(3), 269–285. Dunkin, B. A., Andrales, G. L., Apelgren, K., & Mellinger, J. D. (2007). Surgical simulation: A current review. Surgical Endoscopy, 21(3), 357−366. Fauziah Baharoom, Aziz Deraman & Abdul Razak Hamdan. (2005). A survey on the current practices of software development process in Malaysia. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 4, 57–76. Hamdorf, J. M., & Hall, J. C. (2000). Acquiring surgical skills. British Journal of Surgery,87(1), 28–37. Hollerbach, M. J. (2000). Some current issues in haptics research. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 522−525. Hsiu-Mei Huang, et al. (2009). Developing a virtual reality learning environment for medical education. In T. Bastiaens et al., Proceeding of World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Institution 2009 (pp. 1320–1329). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Lamata, P., Gomez, E. J., Sanchez-Margallo, F. M., Lopez, O., Monserrat, C., Garcia, V., Alberola, C., Florida, M. A. R., Ruiz, J., & Uson, J. (2007). SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: Didactic design and technical development. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 85(3), 273–283. Najmaldin, A. (2007). Skills training in paediatric minimal access surgery. Journal of Paediatric Surgery, 42(2), 284–289. Norkhairani Abdul Rawi, Halimah Badioze Zaman & Azlina Ahmad. (2013). Design of class components for laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptics elements: A case study of SPLasH. Lecture Notes in Software Engineering, 1, (3), pp. 323–328. Norkhairani Abdul Rawi, Halimah Badioze Zaman, & Azlina Ahmad. (2012). Technical solution framework for simulation with haptics elements: A case study of SPLasH (Simulasi Pembedahan Laparoskopi dengan Elemen Haptik). In Halimah Badioze Zaman et al., VIIS‘12: Visual Informatics International Seminar (pp. 256–265). Kuala Lumpur: DSS Publishing Enterprise. Norkhairani Abdul Rawi, Halimah Badioze Zaman & Azlina Ahmad. (2011). Simulations for laparoscopy surgery with element for medical students in HUKM: A preliminary analysis. In Halimah Badioze Zaman et al., Visual informatics: Sustaining research and innovations - Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7066 (pp. 125−138). Selangor, Malaysia: Springer Verlag. Panait, L., Akkary, E Bell, R. L., & Robert, K. E. (2009). The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. Journal of Surgical Research,156(2), 312–316. Patrick, J. (1992). Training: Research and practice. London: Academic Press. Richard, C., & Cutkosky, M. R. (1997). Contact force perception with an ungrounded haptic interface. In Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division. ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congress and Exhibition, Dallas, 181–187. Rosen, J., Hannaford, B., Richards, C. G., & Sinanan, M. N. (2001). Markov modelling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 48(5), 579−591. Tuchschmit, S., Grassi, M., Bachofen, D., Früh, P., Thaler, M., Sze’kely. G., & Harder, M. (2006). A flexible framework for highly-modular surgical simulation systems. In M., Harders, & G., Sze’kely (Eds.), ISBMS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4072 (pp. 84–92). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Sansregret, A., Fried, G. M., Hasson, H., Klassen, D., Lagace’, M., Gagnon, R., & Charlin, B. (2009). Choosing the right physical laparoscopic simulator? Comparison of LTS2000-ISM60 with MISTELS: Validation, correlation, and user satisfaction. The American Journal of Surgery, 197(2), 258–265. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1998). Motor control and learning: A behavioural emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. SensAble Technologies. (2008). OpenHaptics® Toolkit Programmer’s Guide Retrieved from http://www.dsc.sensable.com Seymour, N. E., & Rotnes, J. S. (2006). Challenges to the development of complex virtual surgical simulations. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 1774– 1777. Thompson II, T., & Cohen, E. (1999). Direct haptic rendering of complex trimmed NURBS models. Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Div. Udechukwu Ojiako, G., Greenwood, D. J., & Eric Johansen, D. (2005). Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 4, 17−36. Westerbring-van der Putten, E. P., Goosens, R. H., Jakimowicz, J. J. (2008). Haptics in minimally invasive surgery – A review. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, 17 (1), 3−16. Westerbring-van der Putten, E. P., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J. Goosens, R. H., & Dankelman, J. (2009). Force feedback requirements for efficient laparoscopic grasp control. Ergonomics, 52(9), 1055–1066. Westerbring-van der Putten, E. P., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J. Goosens, R. H., Dankelman, J. (2010). The effect of augmented feedback on grasp force in laparoscopic grasp control. IEEE Transactions On Haptics, 3(4), 280–291. Wong, J. A., & Matsumoto, E. D. (2008). Primer: Cognitive motor learning for teaching surgical skill—how are surgical skills taught and assessed? Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 5(1), 47–54. |
| originalfilename | 5585-01-FH02-FIK-15-02352.jpg |
| person | UniSZA Unisza unisza |
| recordtype | oai_dc |
| resourceurl | https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=11355 |
| spelling | 11355 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=11355 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal UniSZA Unisza unisza image/jpeg inches 796 96 96 19 19 1428 2015-01-11 08:26:49 1428x796 5585-01-FH02-FIK-15-02352.jpg UniSZA Private Access Technical considerations in designing haptic applications: A case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements Journal of Information and Communication Technology Simulation has been widely used as a tool for training, especially in high risk areas such as in the aerospace, military and medical fields. Surgery is one of the sub areas that has been receiving much attention from researchers due to the ability of simulation to provide a real surgery setting and human organs with appropriate devices to increase the realism. Developing a surgical simulation is a technically complex process since it involves a few components that interact with each other. Thus this necessitates further considerations regarding the issues and challenges in order to produce an accurate and interactive application. Therefore there is a need for a technical solution framework to help a new and novice researcher in this area to get started. This paper discusses the important components of a surgical simulator, together with its issues and challenges. A proposed solution framework, together with the programming or application choices that are available for each of the components, is explained clearly as concluded from the discussion in the previous work. The class structure for the components is shown briefly to give the new researcher an idea of it. It is hoped that this paper will serve as a foundation for new and novice researchers in haptic development specifically and visual informatics generally. 13 1 Universiti Utara Malaysia Press Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 125-144 Alan Liu, F., Tendick, K., Clerly, & Kaufmann C., (2003). A survey of surgical simulation: Application, technology and education. Presence, 12(6), 599–614. Basdogan, C., Chih-Hao Ho, & Mandayam, A. Srinivasan. (2001). Virtual environments for medical training: Graphical and haptic simulation of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Mechatronics, IEEE/ ASME Transactions, 6(3), 269–285. Dunkin, B. A., Andrales, G. L., Apelgren, K., & Mellinger, J. D. (2007). Surgical simulation: A current review. Surgical Endoscopy, 21(3), 357−366. Fauziah Baharoom, Aziz Deraman & Abdul Razak Hamdan. (2005). A survey on the current practices of software development process in Malaysia. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 4, 57–76. Hamdorf, J. M., & Hall, J. C. (2000). Acquiring surgical skills. British Journal of Surgery,87(1), 28–37. Hollerbach, M. J. (2000). Some current issues in haptics research. Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 522−525. Hsiu-Mei Huang, et al. (2009). Developing a virtual reality learning environment for medical education. In T. Bastiaens et al., Proceeding of World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Institution 2009 (pp. 1320–1329). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Lamata, P., Gomez, E. J., Sanchez-Margallo, F. M., Lopez, O., Monserrat, C., Garcia, V., Alberola, C., Florida, M. A. R., Ruiz, J., & Uson, J. (2007). SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: Didactic design and technical development. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 85(3), 273–283. Najmaldin, A. (2007). Skills training in paediatric minimal access surgery. Journal of Paediatric Surgery, 42(2), 284–289. Norkhairani Abdul Rawi, Halimah Badioze Zaman & Azlina Ahmad. (2013). Design of class components for laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptics elements: A case study of SPLasH. Lecture Notes in Software Engineering, 1, (3), pp. 323–328. Norkhairani Abdul Rawi, Halimah Badioze Zaman, & Azlina Ahmad. (2012). Technical solution framework for simulation with haptics elements: A case study of SPLasH (Simulasi Pembedahan Laparoskopi dengan Elemen Haptik). In Halimah Badioze Zaman et al., VIIS‘12: Visual Informatics International Seminar (pp. 256–265). Kuala Lumpur: DSS Publishing Enterprise. Norkhairani Abdul Rawi, Halimah Badioze Zaman & Azlina Ahmad. (2011). Simulations for laparoscopy surgery with element for medical students in HUKM: A preliminary analysis. In Halimah Badioze Zaman et al., Visual informatics: Sustaining research and innovations - Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7066 (pp. 125−138). Selangor, Malaysia: Springer Verlag. Panait, L., Akkary, E Bell, R. L., & Robert, K. E. (2009). The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. Journal of Surgical Research,156(2), 312–316. Patrick, J. (1992). Training: Research and practice. London: Academic Press. Richard, C., & Cutkosky, M. R. (1997). Contact force perception with an ungrounded haptic interface. In Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division. ASME Int. Mech. Eng. Congress and Exhibition, Dallas, 181–187. Rosen, J., Hannaford, B., Richards, C. G., & Sinanan, M. N. (2001). Markov modelling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 48(5), 579−591. Tuchschmit, S., Grassi, M., Bachofen, D., Früh, P., Thaler, M., Sze’kely. G., & Harder, M. (2006). A flexible framework for highly-modular surgical simulation systems. In M., Harders, & G., Sze’kely (Eds.), ISBMS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4072 (pp. 84–92). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Sansregret, A., Fried, G. M., Hasson, H., Klassen, D., Lagace’, M., Gagnon, R., & Charlin, B. (2009). Choosing the right physical laparoscopic simulator? Comparison of LTS2000-ISM60 with MISTELS: Validation, correlation, and user satisfaction. The American Journal of Surgery, 197(2), 258–265. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1998). Motor control and learning: A behavioural emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. SensAble Technologies. (2008). OpenHaptics® Toolkit Programmer’s Guide Retrieved from http://www.dsc.sensable.com Seymour, N. E., & Rotnes, J. S. (2006). Challenges to the development of complex virtual surgical simulations. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 1774– 1777. Thompson II, T., & Cohen, E. (1999). Direct haptic rendering of complex trimmed NURBS models. Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Div. Udechukwu Ojiako, G., Greenwood, D. J., & Eric Johansen, D. (2005). Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 4, 17−36. Westerbring-van der Putten, E. P., Goosens, R. H., Jakimowicz, J. J. (2008). Haptics in minimally invasive surgery – A review. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies, 17 (1), 3−16. Westerbring-van der Putten, E. P., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J. Goosens, R. H., & Dankelman, J. (2009). Force feedback requirements for efficient laparoscopic grasp control. Ergonomics, 52(9), 1055–1066. Westerbring-van der Putten, E. P., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J. Goosens, R. H., Dankelman, J. (2010). The effect of augmented feedback on grasp force in laparoscopic grasp control. IEEE Transactions On Haptics, 3(4), 280–291. Wong, J. A., & Matsumoto, E. D. (2008). Primer: Cognitive motor learning for teaching surgical skill—how are surgical skills taught and assessed? Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 5(1), 47–54. |
| spellingShingle | Technical considerations in designing haptic applications: A case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements |
| summary | Simulation has been widely used as a tool for training, especially in high risk areas such as in the aerospace, military and medical fields. Surgery is one of the sub areas that has been receiving much attention from researchers due to the ability of simulation to provide a real surgery setting and human organs with appropriate devices to increase the realism. Developing a surgical simulation is a technically complex process since it involves a few components that interact with each other. Thus this necessitates further considerations regarding the issues and challenges in order to produce an accurate and interactive application. Therefore there is a need for a technical solution framework to help a new and novice researcher in this area to get started. This paper discusses the important components of a surgical simulator, together with its issues and challenges. A proposed solution framework, together with the programming or application choices that are available for each of the components, is explained clearly as concluded from the discussion in the previous work. The class structure for the components is shown briefly to give the new researcher an idea of it. It is hoped that this paper will serve as a foundation for new and novice researchers in haptic development specifically and visual informatics generally. |
| title | Technical considerations in designing haptic applications: A case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements |
| title_full | Technical considerations in designing haptic applications: A case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements |
| title_fullStr | Technical considerations in designing haptic applications: A case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements |
| title_full_unstemmed | Technical considerations in designing haptic applications: A case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements |
| title_short | Technical considerations in designing haptic applications: A case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements |
| title_sort | technical considerations in designing haptic applications: a case study of laparoscopy surgery simulation with haptic elements |