| _version_ |
1860796854465200128
|
| building |
INTELEK Repository
|
| collection |
Online Access
|
| collectionurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072
|
| date |
2014-02-03 12:24:26
|
| format |
Restricted Document
|
| id |
10437
|
| institution |
UniSZA
|
| internalnotes |
DiYanni, Robert, 2008. Literature Approaches to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw Hill. Elliot, R., 1990. “Encouraging Reader-Response to Literature in ESL Situation”. ELT Journal, 44(3): 191- 198. Ganakumaran Subramaniam, 2007. (Ed.) Approaches for Teaching Literature: Theory andPractice. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi Sdn.Bhd. Gilroy, M. & B. Parkinson, 1997.“Teaching Literature in a Foreign Language”. Language Teaching, 29: 213-225. Ibsen, E.B., 1990. The double role of fiction in foreign language learning: towards a creative methodology. English Teaching., XXVIII. Kennedy, X.J. and Gioia, Dana, 2011. Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. Revised Edition for Burlington County College. NY: Pearson. Lazar, G., 1993. Literature and Language teaching. Glasgow: Cambridge University Press. Lynn, Steven, 2008. Texts and Contexts: Writing About Literature with Critical Theory. 5th ed. NY: Pearson. Mc Eneaney, J., L. Li, K. Allen and L. Guzniczak, 2009. “Stance, Navigation, and Reader Response in Expository Hypertext”. Journal of Literacy Research, 41: 1-45. McRae, J & R. Boardman, 1992. ReadingBetween the lines: Integrated language andliterature activities. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. Oster, J., 1989. “Seeing with different eyes: Another View of Literature in the ESL Class”. TESOL Quarterly, 23: 85-103. Peralta-Nash, C., & J.A. Dutch, 2000. Literature circles: Creating an environment for choice. Primary Voices K-6, 8(4): 29-37. Pradl, Gordon, 1996. Literature for Democracy: Reading as a Social Act. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook. Rosenblatt, L.M., 1994. The transactionaltheory of reading and writing.In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Rosenblatt, Louise, 1996. Literature as Exploration, 5th edition. New York: Modern Language Association. Rosenblatt, Louise, 1994. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work, 2nd Edition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Tottan, S., 1998. “Using Reader-Response Theory to StudyPoetry about Holocaust with High School Students”. TheSocial Studies, 89(1): 30-34. PowerPoint: https://www.faulkner.edu/admin/websites/cwarmack/Reader-Response%20Theory.ppt. How to Write a Reader Response Paper: http://utminers.utep.edu/omwilliamson/engl0310link/readerresponse.htm.
|
| originalfilename |
4412-01-FH02-FBK-14-01585.pdf
|
| person |
Dekan
|
| recordtype |
oai_dc
|
| resourceurl |
https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=10437
|
| spelling |
10437 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/view.php?ref=10437 https://intelek.unisza.edu.my/intelek/pages/search.php?search=!collection407072 Restricted Document Article Journal application/pdf 9 1.6 Adobe Acrobat Pro DC 20 Paper Capture Plug-in Dekan 2014-02-03 12:24:26 34 4412-01-FH02-FBK-14-01585.pdf UniSZA Private Access A Comparative Literature of Reader Response Theory in Thriller Fictions: Sheldon vs. Ramlee Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences This comparative literature study focuses on the elements of Reader Response Theory (RRT) in thriller fictions between two outstanding American and Malaysian novelists, Sidney Sheldon and Ramlee Awang Murshid. Sheldon, one of the most famous American authors who wrote a lot of magnificent novels, whereas Ramlee is an established thriller fiction novelist in Malaysia. According to International Thriller Writers, a thriller is characterized by "the sudden rush of emotions, the excitement, and sense of suspense, apprehension, and exhilaration that drive the narrative, sometimes subtly with peaks and lulls, sometimes at a constant, breakneck pace." Therefore, this qualitative study aims to find the similarities and differences of both popular novelists from the view of RRT and how they managed to attract readers. From other point of views, the study also stresses on the elements of the concepts of “meaning” and “truth” in their literary works, in which are the main attractions to their avid readers and followers. Based on the findings, it is obvious that both authors implement different styles and figurative language to capture reader’s thriller mood, in which it is extremely successful. 7 14 410-418 DiYanni, Robert, 2008. Literature Approaches to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw Hill. Elliot, R., 1990. “Encouraging Reader-Response to Literature in ESL Situation”. ELT Journal, 44(3): 191- 198. Ganakumaran Subramaniam, 2007. (Ed.) Approaches for Teaching Literature: Theory andPractice. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi Sdn.Bhd. Gilroy, M. & B. Parkinson, 1997.“Teaching Literature in a Foreign Language”. Language Teaching, 29: 213-225. Ibsen, E.B., 1990. The double role of fiction in foreign language learning: towards a creative methodology. English Teaching., XXVIII. Kennedy, X.J. and Gioia, Dana, 2011. Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. Revised Edition for Burlington County College. NY: Pearson. Lazar, G., 1993. Literature and Language teaching. Glasgow: Cambridge University Press. Lynn, Steven, 2008. Texts and Contexts: Writing About Literature with Critical Theory. 5th ed. NY: Pearson. Mc Eneaney, J., L. Li, K. Allen and L. Guzniczak, 2009. “Stance, Navigation, and Reader Response in Expository Hypertext”. Journal of Literacy Research, 41: 1-45. McRae, J & R. Boardman, 1992. ReadingBetween the lines: Integrated language andliterature activities. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. Oster, J., 1989. “Seeing with different eyes: Another View of Literature in the ESL Class”. TESOL Quarterly, 23: 85-103. Peralta-Nash, C., & J.A. Dutch, 2000. Literature circles: Creating an environment for choice. Primary Voices K-6, 8(4): 29-37. Pradl, Gordon, 1996. Literature for Democracy: Reading as a Social Act. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook. Rosenblatt, L.M., 1994. The transactionaltheory of reading and writing.In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Rosenblatt, Louise, 1996. Literature as Exploration, 5th edition. New York: Modern Language Association. Rosenblatt, Louise, 1994. The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work, 2nd Edition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Tottan, S., 1998. “Using Reader-Response Theory to StudyPoetry about Holocaust with High School Students”. TheSocial Studies, 89(1): 30-34. PowerPoint: https://www.faulkner.edu/admin/websites/cwarmack/Reader-Response%20Theory.ppt. How to Write a Reader Response Paper: http://utminers.utep.edu/omwilliamson/engl0310link/readerresponse.htm.
|
| spellingShingle |
A Comparative Literature of Reader Response Theory in Thriller Fictions: Sheldon vs. Ramlee
|
| subject |
34
|
| summary |
This comparative literature study focuses on the elements of Reader Response Theory (RRT) in thriller fictions between two outstanding American and Malaysian novelists, Sidney Sheldon and Ramlee Awang Murshid. Sheldon, one of the most famous American authors who wrote a lot of magnificent novels, whereas Ramlee is an established thriller fiction novelist in Malaysia. According to International Thriller Writers, a thriller is characterized by "the sudden rush of emotions, the excitement, and sense of suspense, apprehension, and exhilaration that drive the narrative, sometimes subtly with peaks and lulls, sometimes at a constant, breakneck pace." Therefore, this qualitative study aims to find the similarities and differences of both popular novelists from the view of RRT and how they managed to attract readers. From other point of views, the study also stresses on the elements of the concepts of “meaning” and “truth” in their literary works, in which are the main attractions to their avid readers and followers. Based on the findings, it is obvious that both authors implement different styles and figurative language to capture reader’s thriller mood, in which it is extremely successful.
|
| title |
A Comparative Literature of Reader Response Theory in Thriller Fictions: Sheldon vs. Ramlee
|
| title_full |
A Comparative Literature of Reader Response Theory in Thriller Fictions: Sheldon vs. Ramlee
|
| title_fullStr |
A Comparative Literature of Reader Response Theory in Thriller Fictions: Sheldon vs. Ramlee
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparative Literature of Reader Response Theory in Thriller Fictions: Sheldon vs. Ramlee
|
| title_short |
A Comparative Literature of Reader Response Theory in Thriller Fictions: Sheldon vs. Ramlee
|
| title_sort |
comparative literature of reader response theory in thriller fictions: sheldon vs. ramlee
|